Skip to main content

Post-Occupancy Evaluation: Research Paradigm or Diagnostic Tool

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Building Performance Evaluation

Abstract

Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE), now incorporated into Building Performance Evaluation (BPE), is a form of systematic inquiry intended to discover and document how a building, product, or service has worked for its intended use. It is an invaluable tool for increasing the likelihood that time, money, and effort invested in such endeavors achieves anticipated benefits for targeted users. This chapter argues that the role of POE in improving building performance has been inadvertently limited by trying to make POE an academically acceptable form of rigorous evaluation research. Of more value is developing POE as a diagnostic tool, essentially a clinical technique, conducted and used within organizations for their own continuous improvement, and as an important management tool for improving the business value of capital improvements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altman, I. (1976). Privacy: A conceptual analysis. Environment and Behavior, 8, 7–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F. (1974). Design for living: The residents’ view of multi-family housing. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Center for Urban Development and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F. (1990). The total workplace: Facilities management and the elastic organization. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F., & Steele, F. (1995). Workplace by design: Creating the high performance workscape. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brill, M. (1984). Using office design to increase productivity. Buffalo, New York: Workplace Design and Productivity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, K., Iedema, R., & Kerridge, R. (2008). Reshaping ICU ward round practices using video reflexive ethnography. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 380–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coiera, E., & Tombs, V. (1998). Communication behaviours in a hospital setting: An observational study. British Medical Journal, 316, 673–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. (1975). Easter hill village. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotts, D. G., Roper, R. O., & Payant, R. P. (2010). The facilities management handbook. New York: American Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iedema, R. (2003). Discourses of post-bureaucratic organization (Vol. 5). London: John Benjamin’s Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. J., & Barach, P. (2008). Role of qualitative methods in designing health care organizations. Environment and Behavior, 40(2), 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, D., Iedema, R., & Lee, B. (2007). Corridor conversations: Clinical communication in casual spaces. In R. Iedema (Ed.), The discourse of hospital communication (pp. 182–200). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marans, R. W., & Spreckelmeyer, K. F. (1982). Evaluating open and conventional office design. Environment and Behavior, 14, 333–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, C. C., & Barnes, M. (1999). Healing gardens: Therapeutic benefits and design recommendations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preiser, W. F. E., & Vischer, J. (Eds.) (2005). Assessing building performance. Oxford, UK: Elsevier. (republished in 2015, London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Preiser, W. F. E., Rabinowitz, H. Z., & White, E. T. (1988). Post-occupancy evaluation. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. (republished in 2015, London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, S., & Lewin, S. (2004). Interprofessional collaboration in the hospital: Strategies and meanings. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 9(4), 218–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rondeau, E. P., Brown, R. K., & Lapides, P. D. (2012). Facility management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 334–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanoff, H. (2000). Community participation methods in design and planning. NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepley, M. M., Zimmerman, K. N., Boggess, M. M., & Lee, Y. J. (2009). Architectural office post-occupancy evaluation. Journal of Interior Design, 34, 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, N. (2012). The signal and the noise: Why so many predictions fail-but some don’t. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, R. (1969). Personal space, The behavioral basis of design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichler, J. F., & Hamilton, D. K. (2008). Rigor and replication. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 2, 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundstrom, E., Burt, R., & Kamp, D. (1980). Privacy at work, architectural correlates of job satisfaction and job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teicholz, E. (2001). Facility design and management handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeisel, J. (1974). Fundamental values in planning with the non-paying client. In J. Lang, C. Burnette, W. Moleski, & D. Vachon (Eds.), Designing for human behavior (pp. 293–301). Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden Hutchinson & Ross.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, A., & Martin, M. (2001). Post-occupancy evaluation: Benefits and barriers. Building Research & Information, 29(2), 168–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franklin Becker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Becker, F. (2018). Post-Occupancy Evaluation: Research Paradigm or Diagnostic Tool. In: Preiser, W., Hardy, A., Schramm, U. (eds) Building Performance Evaluation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56862-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56862-1_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56861-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56862-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics