Skip to main content

Evaluating Workplace Constructs Using Computerized Techniques of Space Syntax

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Building Performance Evaluation

Abstract

Previous literature on space syntax showed how workspace layout generated boundaries that created relationships of accessibility and visibility (Rashid et al. 2005). These measures in turn regulated occupants’ behavior and activities. Previous research also measured the impact of spatial layouts and various organizational constructs such as employees’ performance, satisfaction, and face-to-face communication levels. However, there is little research that documents whether these techniques are implemented in professional practice. Within this chapter, the author discusses and compares the visual properties of six different semi-government and private offices in Dubai regarding their terms of intelligibility and their expected level of face-to-face communication among employees. The author provides a comparison between these offices and mainstream workplace concepts using space syntax techniques. The goal of using these techniques is to establish a systematic and an objective way in describing the relationship between organizational constructs and office layouts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Backhouse, A., & Drew, P. (1992). The design implications of social interaction in a workplace setting. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 19(5), 573–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bashir. (2014, December 17). Mohammed bin Rashid launches Dubai Strategy 2021. Retrieved from http://www.wam.ae/en/news/emirates-international/1395273975190.html. Accessed 1 July 2016.

  • Benedikt, M. L. (1979). To take hold of space: isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 6(1), 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boutellier, R., Ullman, F., Schreiber, J., & Naef, R. (2008). Impact of office layout on communication in a science-driven business. R&D Magazine, 38(4), 372–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, F. (2015). Buildings and their use: The dog that didn’t bark. In W. F. E. Preiser, A. T. Davis, A. M. Salama, & A. Hardy (Eds.), Architecture beyond criticism: Expert judgment and performance evaluation (pp. 128–132). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, N. (1997).Opening address. In M. D. Major, L. Amorim, & F. Dufaux (Eds.), Proceedings of the first international space syntax symposium (Vol. 3, pp. xvii–xxii). London: Space Syntax Laboratory, The Bartlett School of Architecture, University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2001). A descriptive framework of workspace awareness for real time groupware. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 11(3), 411–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haq, S., & Zimring, C. (2003). Just down the road a piece: The development of topological knowledge of building layouts. Environment and Behavior, 35(1), 132–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, B. (2008). The impact of office layout on productivity. Journal of Facilities Management, 6(3), 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heerwagen, J. H., Kampschroer, K., Powell, K. M., & Loftness, V. (2004). Collaborative knowledge work environments. Building Research & Information, 32(6), 510–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Natapov, A., Kuliga, S. Dalton, R., & Hölscher, C. (2015). Building circulation typology and space syntax predictive measures. In K. Karimi, L. Vaughan, K. Sailer, G. Palaiologou, & T. Bolton (Eds.), Space syntax: Proceedings of the tenth international space syntax symposium (Vol. 30, pp. 1–16). London: Space Syntax Laboratory, The Bartlett School of Architecture, University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peponis, J., Zimring, C., & Choi, Y. K. (1990). Finding the building in wayfinding. Environment and Behavior, 22, 555–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preiser, W. F. E., Davis, A. T., Salama, A. M., & Hardy, A. E. (Eds.). (2015). Architecture beyond criticism: Expert judgment and performance evaluation. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, M., Zimring, C., Wineman, J., Flaningam, T., Nubani, L., & Hammash, R. (2005). The effects of spatial behaviors and layout attributes on individuals’ perception of psychosocial constructs in offices. In A. Van Nes (Ed.), Proceedings of the fifth international space syntax symposium (pp. 71–88). Amsterdam: Delft University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science, 12(4), 502–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. A. (1991). The reflective practitioner. Alderschot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staff. (2012, May 7). New Dubai trade licenses up 27%. Retrieved from http://www.emirates247.com/business/economy-finance/new-dubai-trade-licences-up-27-2012-05-07-1.457555. Accessed 1 July 2016.

  • Stryker, J., Santoro, M., & Farris, G. (2012). Creating collaboration opportunity: Designing the physical workplace to promote high-tech team communication. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(4), 609–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, R. (2002). Future workplace design. Displays, 23, 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooren, W. (2011). How to create office layouts that stimulate collaboration? United Academics Journal of Social Sciences, 2011(7), 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A. (2001). Depthmap: A program to perform visibility graph analysis. In J. Peponis, J. Wineman, & S. Bafna (Eds.), Proceedings of the third international space syntax symposium (Vol. 31; pp. 1–9). Atlanta: A. Alfred Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A., & Penn, A. (1999). Making isovists syntactic: Isovist integration analysis. In M. D. Major & L. Amorim (Eds.), Proceedings of the second international space syntax symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 1–9). Brasilia: Universidad de Brasilia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda N. Nubani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nubani, L.N. (2018). Evaluating Workplace Constructs Using Computerized Techniques of Space Syntax. In: Preiser, W., Hardy, A., Schramm, U. (eds) Building Performance Evaluation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56862-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56862-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56861-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56862-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics