Skip to main content

Runtime Verification for Linear-Time Temporal Logic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Engineering Trustworthy Software Systems (SETSS 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 10215))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper and its accompanying tutorial, we discuss the topic of runtime verification for linear-time temporal logic specifications. We recall the idea of runtime verification, give ideas about specification languages for runtime verification and develop a solid theory for linear-time temporal logic. Concepts like monitors, impartiality, and anticipation are explained based on this logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.runtime-verification.org.

  2. 2.

    Clearly, in the MOP framework, a diagnosis can be carried out in the code triggered by a monitor. This yields a program using the MOP methodology and following the RR pattern.

References

  1. Bertot, Y., Castéran, P.: Interactive Theorem Proving and Program Development Coq’Art: The Calculus of Inductive Constructions. Texts in Theoretical Computer Science. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Biere, A., Cimatti, A., Clarke, E.M., Strichman, O., Zhu, Y.: Bounded model checking. Adv. Comput. 58, 117–148 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Broy, M., Jonsson, B., Katoen, J.-P., Leucker, M., Pretschner, A. (eds.): Model-Based Testing of Reactive Systems, Advanced Lectures. LNCS, vol. 3472. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). The volume is the outcome of a research seminar that was held in Schloss Dagstuhl in January 2004

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bauer, A., Leucker, M., Schallhart, C.: Model-based runtime analysis of distributed reactive systems. In: Proceedings of the Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC 2006), pp. 243–252. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bauer, A., Leucker, M., Schallhart, C.: Model-based runtime analysis of distributed reactive systems. In: ASWEC, pp. 243–252 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bauer, A., Leucker, M., Schallhart, C.: Runtime verification for LTL and TLTL. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. (TOSEM), 20(4) (2011, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boehm, B.W.: Software Engineering Economics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Büchi, J.R.: On a decision method in restricted second order arithmetic. In: Proceedings of the International Congress on Logic, Method, and Philosophy of Science, pp. 1–12. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chimento, J.M., Ahrendt, W., Pace, G.J., Schneider, G.: StaRVOOrS: a tool for combined static and runtime verification of Java. In: Bartocci, E., Majumdar, R. (eds.) RV 2015. LNCS, vol. 9333, pp. 297–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23820-3_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.: Model Checking. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Chow, T.S.: Testing software design modeled by finite-state machines. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 4(3), 178–187 (1978)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Crow, J., Rushby, J.: Model-based reconfiguration: diagnosis and recovery. NASA Contractor report 4596, NASA Langley Research Center (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, F., Rosu, G.: Mop: an efficient and generic runtime verification framework. In: OOPSLA, pp. 569–588 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dwyer, M.B., Avrunin, G.S., Corbett, J.C.: Patterns in property specifications for finite-state verification. In: ICSE, pp. 411–420 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Delgado, N., Gates, A.Q., Roach, S.: A taxonomy and catalog of runtime software-fault monitoring tools. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 30(12), 859–872 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. D’Angelo, B., Sankaranarayanan, S., Sánchez, C., Robinson, W., Finkbeiner, B., Sipma, H.B., Mehrotra, S., Manna, Z.: LOLA: Runtime monitoring of synchronous systems. In: TIME (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hinchey, M.G., Sterritt, R.: Self-managing software. IEEE. Comput. 39(2), 107–109 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hopcroft, J.E., Ullman, J.D.: Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages and Computation. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Leucker, M.: Sliding between model checking and runtime verification. In: Qadeer, S., Tasiran, S. (eds.) RV 2012. LNCS, vol. 7687, pp. 82–87. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35632-2_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Mostafa, M., Bonakdarpour, B.: Decentralized runtime verification of LTL specifications in distributed systems. In: IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, IPDPS 2015, Hyderabad, India, 25–29 May 2015, pp. 494–503. IEEE Computer Society (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Myers, G.J.: The Art of Software Testing, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pretschner, A., Leucker, M.: Model-based testing – a glossary. In: Broy, M., Jonsson, B., Katoen, J.-P., Leucker, M., Pretschner, A. (eds.) Model-Based Testing of Reactive Systems. LNCS, vol. 3472, pp. 607–609. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi:10.1007/11498490_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Pnueli, A.: The temporal logic of programs. In: FOCS, pp. 46–57 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sistla, A.P., Clarke, E.M.: The complexity of propositional linear temporal logics. J. ACM 32(3), 733–749 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwoon, S., Esparza, J.: A note on on-the-fly verification algorithms. In: Halbwachs, N., Zuck, L.D. (eds.) TACAS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3440, pp. 174–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-31980-1_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Scheffel, T., Schmitz, M.: Three-valued asynchronous distributed runtime verification. In: Twelfth ACM/IEEE International Conference on Formal Methods and Models for Codesign, MEMOCODE 2014, Lausanne, Switzerland, 19–21 October 2014, pp. 52–61. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sen, K., Vardhan, A., Agha, G., Rosu, G.: Efficient decentralized monitoring of safety in distributed systems. In: Finkelstein, A., Estublier, J., Rosenblum, D.S. (eds.) 26th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2004), 23–28 May 2004, Edinburgh, UK, pp. 418–427. IEEE Computer Society (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tarjan, R.E.: Depth-first search and linear graph algorithms. SIAM J. Comput. 1(2), 146–160 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Thomas, W.: Automata on infinite objects (Chap. 4). In: van Leeuwen, J. (ed.) Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, Volume B, pp. 133–191. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vasilevski, M.P.: Failure diagnosis of automata. Cybernetic 9(4), 653–665 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vardi, M.Y., Wolper, P.: An automata-theoretic approach to automatic program verification (preliminary report). In: LICS, pp. 332–344 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Many thanks goes to the team at ISP for fruitful discussions about the content of this chapter, especially to Malte Schmitz.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Leucker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leucker, M. (2017). Runtime Verification for Linear-Time Temporal Logic. In: Bowen, J., Liu, Z., Zhang, Z. (eds) Engineering Trustworthy Software Systems. SETSS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10215. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56841-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56841-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56840-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56841-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics