Skip to main content

Learning Exchange and the Ethics of Textual Borrowing: Pedagogy, Mobility and Intertextuality Between Academic Cultures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Higher Education in the High North

Part of the book series: Higher Education Dynamics ((HEDY,volume 48))

  • 375 Accesses

Abstract

International student mobility is a complex sociocultural process involving the interchanges and translations of pedagogy and mobility. An exchange of learners and learning takes place, meanwhile mobility and exchange as processes of acculturation also become objects of learning. These learning and mobility processes forms key experiences for individuals doing exchange, and needs to be analyzed from the perspective of these actors (students, faculty, administrators and coordinators) participating in international exchange. In such analysis should also be taken into account not just individual biographies and learning trajectories but also the culture specific academic traditions that constitute contextual conditions for exchange. The cultural-academic conditions for exchanges within the Barents region, between Norway and Russia, is at the focus of this chapter based on interviews with the above mentioned actors. The analysis is also based on field studies of academic cultures in the two countries, and on a selection of institutional histories. The analysis specify the problem in cultural analytic and epistemic terms, then contribute to an inventory of similarities and differences between academic contexts based on styles of learning and teaching characteristic of institutional styles. A key focus will be on documented issues of contestability between these academic traditions such as “plagiarism”, language proficiency, and perceptions of student work load. The implication of this analysis is that an understanding of different academic cultures based on respect and mutual trust is beneficial in order to avoid narrow minded ethnocentric judgments of qualities of academic performance.

(until 2015: Northern [Arctic] Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this chapter we use the female pronoun in an inclusive way.

References

  • Abasi, A. R., & Graves, B. (2008). Academic literacy and plagiarism: Conversations with international graduate students and disciplinary professors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(4), 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelova, M., & Riazantseva, A. (1999). “If you don’t tell me, how can I know?” A case study of four international students learning to write the US way. Written Communication, 16(4), 491–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, H. (1994 [2004]). The location of culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1994). Academic discourse: Linguistic misunderstanding and professorial power. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J., & Zetterling, C.-M. (2009). Guiding students away from plagiarism. Stockholm: KTH Learning Lab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasoma, R., Thompson, C., & Pennycook, A. (2004). Beyond plagiarism: Transgressive and nontransgressive intertextuality. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 3(3), 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, J. (2011, March 1). Plagiarism in dissertation costs German defense minister his job. The New York Times, p. A4. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/02/world/europe/02germany.html?_r=0. Accessed 13 Apr 2016.

  • Dissernet (“ДИССЕРНЕТ”). (2016). Chronicles “dissernet”. http://www.dissernet.org/. Accessed 19 Jan 2016.

  • East, J. (2006). The problem of plagiarism in academic culture. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2(2), 16–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, S. (2007). Overseas students’ intercultural adaptation as intercultural learning: a transformative framework. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 37(2), 167–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, Q., & Brooks, J. (2008). Beyond the accusation of plagiarism. System, 36(3), 337–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, Q., Schweisfurth, M., & Day, C. (2010). Learning and growing in a “foreign” context: Intercultural experiences of international students. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 40(1), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. M. (2007). Understanding “Internet Plagiarism”. Computers and Composition, 24, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledeneva, A. (1998). Russia’s economy of favours: Blat, networking and informal exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledeneva, A. (2006). How Russia really works: The informal practices that shaped post-Soviet politics and business. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: 1. outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy-Lejeune, E. (2002). Student mobility and narrative in Europe: The new strangers. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • On Military Duty and Military Service. (1998). Federal Law № 53 from 28.03.98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, W. J. (1982 [2002]). Orality and literacy: The technologization of the word. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Otten, M. (2003). Intercultural learning and diversity in higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 7(1), 12–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing other’s words: Text, ownership, memory and plagiarism. Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL), 30(2), 201–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2014). The sense of style: The thinking person’s guide to writing in the 21st century. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T. S. (2012). Cosmopolitanism, making the nation and the citizen as a salvation theme of turn of the twentieth century pedagogy. In T. Tolonen, T. Palmu, S. Lappainen, & T. Kurki (Eds.), Cultural practices and transitions in education (pp. 41–58). London: The Tufnell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porshnev, A. (2012). Could lack of intrinsic motivation be a reason for the plagiarism of Russian IT-students? Paper presented at the Workshop on Teaching Business Informatics: Intelligent Educational Systems and E-learning, National Research University Higher School of Economics. Nizhny Novgorod, 24–26 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R. (1995). Plagiarism and identity in intercultural discourse. Language in Society, 24(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R. (1999). Plagiarism. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9(1–2), 188–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidhu, R. (2006). Universities and globalization: To market, to market. Mahwah: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • VroniPlag Wiki. (2016). VroniPlag Wiki – kollaborative Plagiatsdokumentation: Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit Hochschulschriften. http://de.vroniplag.wikia.com/wiki/Home. Accessed 19 Jan 2016.

  • Wilson, K. (n.d.). Wording it up: Plagiarism in the interdiscourse of international students. Unpublished manuscript. http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/153147439?q&versionId=166902947. Accessed 16 Apr 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Per-Anders Forstorp or Lidia Kriulya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Forstorp, PA., Kriulya, L. (2017). Learning Exchange and the Ethics of Textual Borrowing: Pedagogy, Mobility and Intertextuality Between Academic Cultures. In: Sundet, M., Forstorp, PA., Örtenblad, A. (eds) Higher Education in the High North. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 48. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56832-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56832-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56831-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56832-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics