Skip to main content

Academics’ Perception on Research Versus Teaching and Their Recognition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter describes academics’ perception on teaching and discusses the institutional reward system of teaching in the Hong Kong context. First, it examines the academics’ perception regarding whether the value of teaching has gained or lost its importance during the last decade and whether teaching and research are compatible. Second, it discusses the institutional differences of teaching in terms of the teaching load, reward system, assessment, and personnel decision making. The institutional environment for teaching in practice varies among academics in different contexts. Thus, the chapter discusses the implications of this environment and provides recommendations on designing a proper reward system for academic teaching activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • AAUP. (2014). Tenure and teaching-intensive appointments report. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1996). Western misperceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning culture. In D. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences. Melbourne and Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Australian Council for Educational Research and the Comparative Education Research Centre. The University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. (1992). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braxton, J. M., Luckey, W., & Helland, P. (2002). Institutionalizing a broader view of scholarship through Boyer’s four dimensions. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 29(2), JOSSEY-BASS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brew, A., & Boud, D. (1995). Teaching and research: Stabilising the vital link with learning. Higher Education, 29(9), 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, S. (1999). The Chinese learner – A question of style. Education Training, 41(6/7), 294–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C. K. Y., & Luk, L. Y. Y. (2013). Faculty perspectives on the “3+3+4” curriculum reform in Hong Kong: A case study. International Education Studies, 6(4), 56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C. K. Y., Luk, L. Y. Y., & Zeng, M. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions of student evaluations of teaching. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 20(4), 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colbeck, C. (1998). Merging in a seamless blend. The Journal of Higher Education, 69(6), 647–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, R. (2008). Lecturers’ self-perception of change in their teaching approaches: Reflections on a qualitative study. Educational Research, 50(3), 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, S.,. L. (2006). Institutional potential for online learning: A Hong Kong case study. Educational Technology & Society, 9(4), 78–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, M. (1984). The American academic profession. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, N. J., Massy, W. F., & Young, K. (2001). Research assessment in Hong Kong. Higher Education, 42(1), 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginns, P., & Prosser, M. (2010). Transfer of academic staff learning in a research-intensive university. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(3), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta- analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 507–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, D. (2012). The general education initiative in Hong Kong: Organized contradictions and emerging tensions. Higher Education, 64(2), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, A. (2004). A guide to the research evidence on teaching-research relations. Heslington: The Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, A., & Healey, M. (2005). Institutional strategies to link teaching and research. York: The Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, A., & Zetter, R. (2002). Linking research and teaching in departments. York: LTSN Generic Centre:Learning and Teaching Support Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, L., & Cortazzi, M. (2006). Changing practices in Chinese cultures of learning. Language Culture and Curriculum, 19(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., & Wong, A. (2000). Implications for evaluation from a study of students’ perceptions of good and poor teaching. Higher Education, 40(1), 69–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, T. P., Mah, P., Moore, P., Spinks, J., Sung, J., Tam, M., Wong, D., & Jones, J. (Eds.). (2005). Education quality work: The Hong Kong experience. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahboob, A. (2014). Meeting the challenges of English-medium higher education in Hong Kong. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 52(2), 183–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Hattie, J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Higher Education, 73(5), 603–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K.-H. (2000). Impact of globalization: A study of quality assurance systems of higher education in Hong Kong and Singapore. Comparative Education Review, 44(2), 148–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H. (2014). Enhancing quality of higher education for world-class status. Chinese Education and Society, 47(1), 44–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, D. (2014). Assessing the reliability of student evaluations of teaching: Choosing the right coefficient. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., Martin, E., Trigwell, K., Ramsden, P., & Middleton, H. (2008). University academics’ experience of research and its relationship to their experience of teaching. Instructional Science, 36(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramburuth, P., & McCormick, J. (2001). Learning diversity in higher education: A comparative study of Asian international and Australian students. Higher Education, 42(3), 333–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1998). Influences on academic work: Learning to lead in higher education. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (2009). Reward and recognition of teaching in higher education. Heslington: The Higher Education Academy and GENIE Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning. University of Leicester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P., & Moses, I. (1992). Associations between research and teaching in Australian higher education. Higher Education, 23(3), 273–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P., Margetson, D., Martin, E., & Clarke, S. (1995). Recognising and rewarding good teaching in higher education in Australian higher education. Canberra: Committee for the Advancement of University Teaching. www.autc.gov.au/pubs/caut/rrgt/default.htm

  • Rice, R. E. (1991). The new American scholar: Scholarship and the purposes of the university. Metropolitan Universities: An International Forum, 1(4), 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J. C., Arimoto, A., Cummings, W. K., & Teichler, U. (2014). Teaching and research in contemporary higher education: Systems, activities and rewards. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stes, A., Coertjens, L., & Petegem, P. V. (2010). Instructional development for teachers in higher education: Impact on teaching approach. Higher Education, 60(2), 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K., McNaught, C., Wong, K., & Li, Y. (2011). Early-career academics’ perceptions of teaching and learning in Hong Kong: Implications for professional development. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(3), 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TLQPR Review Team. (1999). A campaign for quality: Hong Kong teaching and learning quality process review. www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/ugc/publication/prog/tlqpr/tlq_fr_r.htm

  • Trigwell, K. (2011). Measuring teaching performance. In J. C. Shin, R. K. Toutkoushian, & U. Teichler (Eds.), University ranking: Theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education (pp. 165–181). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • UGC (University Grants Committee). (2010). Aspirations for the higher education system in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: The University Grants Committee. www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/ugc/publication/report/her2010/her2010.htm

  • Vajoczki, S., Biegas, T. C., Crenshaw, M., Healey, R. L., Osayomi, T., Bradford, M., & Monk, J. (2011). Professional development in teaching and learning for early career academic geographers: Contexts, practices and tensions. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(3), 395–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, B. (2011). Excellence in teaching = f(x) what is f(x)? Engineering faculty seminar series. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubrick, A., Reid, I., & Rossiter, P. (2001). Strengthening the nexus between teaching and research. Canberra: Australian Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jisun Jung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jung, J., Chan, C.K.Y. (2017). Academics’ Perception on Research Versus Teaching and Their Recognition. In: Postiglione, G., Jung, J. (eds) The Changing Academic Profession in Hong Kong. The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56791-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56791-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56789-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56791-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics