Noninvasive Cortical Stimulation

  • Sergio Canavero
  • Vincenzo Bonicalzi


  1. 1.

    Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) (Table 19.1): TMS in a repetitive mode (rTMS) is a noninvasive technique with a benign side effect profile and is easy to administer (for an in-depth description, see [38]). Patients are awake, are alert, and sit in a comfortable chair during treatment sessions, which are roughly 20–30 min in duration. Cardiac or neural pacemakers, metal clips in the brain, and previous seizures are contraindications. Side effects are transient and include scalp discomfort, headache, sleepiness, dizziness, or an increase in pain. Earplugs are recommended to avoid hearing damage.

    In most studies, the primary motor area (M1) has been the target of stimulation; less frequently the primary and secondary somatosensory areas (S1 and S2) have been stimulated. The target is located either with conventional techniques or neuronavigation and may be confirmed by neurophysiological means (i.e., the ability to elicit motor-evoked potentials—assessed by electromyography and/or observation of twitches—in a muscle group corresponding to the affected body region). The classic somatotopic rule has also been questioned by some rTMS studies.

    Puzzlingly, and without any real explanation, investigators based the final stimulation intensity on the motor threshold of the hand area of the unaffected hemisphere for pains affecting any body area; final intensity varied between 80 and 120% of the calculated motor threshold without any rationale.

    Effects can be immediate or build up over several sessions over a few days. Aftereffects are highly variable, either being absent or lasting up to 2 weeks; they are unassociated with entrainment of specific frequencies.

    A handheld machine might expand the use of rTMS to the patient’s home.

  2. 2.

    Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (Table 19.2): tDCS is even easier to administer (for an in-depth description, see [38]). It was introduced more than two centuries ago and was reintroduced for use toward the end of the 1990s. Patients are awake, are alert, and sit in a comfortable chair during treatment sessions. The power supply is 10 mA delivered via two surface conductive electrodes covered with saline- or gel-soaked sponges to reduce impedance. The size is 5 × 7 cm (but can be larger or smaller). The anode carries the positive charge and is considered excitatory, while the cathode conveys the negative charge and is considered inhibitory. Various parameters of stimulation in different settings have been used, with intensities up to 5 mA (generally 2 mA), in single to repeated sessions on consecutive days, and a duration of 5′–30′. The safe current density delivered is 0.029–0.08 mA/cm2. The target is located by using the EEG 10–20 system (M1: C3/4); the reference is placed on the contralateral supraorbital area or shoulder. However, given the large electrodes used, tDCS is expected to engage both M1 and S1. A more focal high-definition tDCS is under study. Side effects include redness under the electrode, tingling, light-headedness, headache, fatigue, insomnia, anxiety, confusion, and nausea, among others: these are generally transient. Exclusion criteria include prior head trauma, pregnancy, and epilepsy. The so-called Reduced Impedance Noninvasive Cortical Stimulation (RINCE) is a variant of tDCS.

  3. 3.

    Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS): tRNS uses alternating current with randomly varying frequencies, resulting in a “white noise” waveform. 10 min of 1 mA tRNS with 100–640 Hz random noise increases M1 excitability for 1 h or more. In contrast to tDCS, both electrodes have an activating effect. It appears safe, but the mechanism of action remains speculative: one possibility is alternating electrical fields repeatedly opening and closing voltage-gated channels. tRNS is well suited for blinded studies since the stimulation goes generally unnoticed, the threshold for cutaneous sensation being higher than for tDCS. Dizziness and headache can follow. Treatment is delivered from a battery-driven stimulator with saline-soaked sponge electrodes (6 × 4 cm), one overlying contralateral-to-pain M1 (hand area), another overlying ipsilateral M1 (face area), a third contralateral-to-pain M1 (face area). Full stimulation consists of 10′ of high-frequency bipolar Gaussian random noise (100–600 Hz) at 1.5 mA with 10″ of fade in/out. Stimulation is not as focal as TMS. It is insensitive to the orientation of neurons.

  4. 4.

    Cranial electrotherapy (CES): This uses a much small microcurrent than tDCS with electrodes over the ear lobules. It can reach deeper brain structures with intensity unchanged from the cortex to brainstem. Stimulation varies from 20′ to 1 h.

  5. 5.

    Transcranial low-intensity focused ultrasound (T-LIFU) or subablative sonication: As known since 1929, ultrasound can modulate the activity of excitable tissues, including neural tissues. The bone is no obstacle for ultrasound and may actually lens it. Pulsed 0.5 MHz T-LIFU (pulse duration: 360 μs repeated at 1 KHz for 500 ms; transducer diameter: 3 cm; focal length: 3 cm, perpendicular to the skull) centered on, e.g., S1 can modulate it—possibly by increasing local cortical inhibitory power—with a spatial resolution of <1 cm (S1 depth 2 cm). Initial studies in patients with chronic pain are promising, but no experience has accrued for CP ([55] and references herein).



Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Migita K, Uozumi T, Arita K, Monden S. Transcranial magnetic coil stimulation of motor cortex in patients with central pain. Neurosurgery. 1995;36:1037–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Canavero S, Bonicalzi V, Paolotti R, Cerutti A. Extradural cortical stimulation for neurogenic pain and Parkinson’s disease: the Turin experience. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of the International Neuromodulation Society, Luzern, 20–26 Aug 1998.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Canavero S, Bonicalzi V, Dotta M, Vighetti S, Asteggiano G, Cocito D. Transcranial magnetic cortical stimulation relieves central pain. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2002;78:192–6. (duplicate in: Neurol Res. 2003;25:151–2)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rollnik JD, Wüstefeld S, Däuper J, Karst M, Fink M, Kossev A, Dengler R. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain—a pilot study. Eur Neurol. 2002;48(1):6–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khedr EM, Kotb H, Kamel NF, Ahmed MA, Sadek R, Rothwell JC. Longlasting antalgic effects of daily sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in central and peripheral neuropathic pain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76(6):833–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hirayama A, Saitoh Y, Kishima H, Shimokawa T, Oshino S, Hirata M, Kato A, Yoshimine T. Reduction of intractable deafferentation pain by navigation-guided repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex. Pain. 2006;122(1–2):22–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saitoh Y, Hirayama A, Kishima H, Shimokawa T, Oshino S, Hirata M, Tani N, Kato A, Yoshimine T. Reduction of intractable deafferentation pain due to spinal cord or peripheral lesion by high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex. J Neurosurg. 2007;107(3):555–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matsumura Y, Hirayama T, Yamamoto T. Comparison between pharmacologic evaluation and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced analgesia in poststroke pain patients. Neuromodulation. 2013;16(4):349–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hosomi K, Kishima H, Oshino S, Hirata M, Tani N, Maruo T, Yorifuji S, Yoshimine T, Saitoh Y. Cortical excitability changes after high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for central poststroke pain. Pain. 2013;154(8):1352–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hosomi K, Shimokawa T, Ikoma K, Nakamura Y, Sugiyama K, Ugawa Y, Uozumi T, Yamamoto T, Saitoh Y. Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex for neuropathic pain: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, crossover, sham-controlled trial. Pain. 2013;154(7):1065–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Irlbacher K, Kuhnert J, Roericht S, Meyer BU, Brandt SA. Zentrale und periphere Deafferenzierungsschmerzen: Therapie mit der repetitiven transkraniellen Magnetstimulation? Nervenarzt. 2006;77:1196–203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Andrè Obadia N, Peyron R, Mertens P, Mauguiere F, Laurent B, Garcia Larrea L. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for pain control. Double blind study of different frequencies against placebo, and correlation with motor cortex stimulation efficacy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:1536–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    André-Obadia N, Mertens P, Lelekov-Boissard T, Afif A, Magnin M, Garcia-Larrea L. Is Life better after motor cortex stimulation for pain control? Results at long-term and their prediction by preoperative rTMS. Pain Physician. 2014;17:53–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Defrin R, Grunhaus L, Zamir D, Zeilig G. The effect of a series of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulations of the motor cortex on central pain after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:1574–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lefaucheur JP, Drouot X, Keravel Y, Nguyen JR. Pain relief induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of precentral cortex. Neuroreport. 2001;12:2963–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lefaucheur JP, Drouot X, Nguyen JP. Interventional neurophysiology for pain control: duration of pain relief following repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. Neurophysiol Clin. 2001;31:247–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lefaucheur JP, Drouot X, Menard-Lefaucheur I, Zerah F, Bendib B, Cesaro P, Keravel Y, Nguyen JP. Neurogenic pain relief by repetitive transcranial magnetic cortical stimulation depends on the origin and the site of pain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75(4):612–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lefaucheur JP, Drouot X, Menard-Lefaucheur I, Nguyen JP. Neuropathic pain controlled for more than a year by monthly sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic cortical stimulation. Neurophysiol Clin. 2004;34:91–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lefaucheur JP, Drouot X, Menard-Lefaucheur I, Keravel Y, Nguyen JP. Motor cortex rTMS restores defective intracortical inhibition in patients with chronic neuropathic pain: correlation with pain relief. Neurology. 2006;67:1568–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lefaucheur JP, Hatem S, Nineb A, Mènard-Lefaucheur I, Wendling S, Nguyen JP. Somatotopic organization of the analgesic effects of motor cortex rTMS in neuropathic pain. Neurology. 2006;67:1998–2004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lefaucheur JP, Drouot X, Menard-LeFaucheur I, Keravel Y, Nguyen JP. Motor cortex rTMS in chronic neuropathic pain: pain relief is associated with thermal sensory perception improvement. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79:1044–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lefaucheur JP, Ménard-Lefaucheur I, Goujon C, Keravel Y, Nguyen JP. Predictive value of rTMS in the identification of responders to epidural motor cortex stimulation therapy for pain. J Pain. 2011;12(10):1102–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lefaucheur JP, Ayache SS, Sorel M, Farhat WH, Zouari HG, Ciampi de Andrade D, Ahdab R, Ménard-Lefaucheur I, Brugières P, Goujon C. Analgesic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in neuropathic pain: influence of theta burst stimulation priming. Eur J Pain. 2012;16(10):1403–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    De Ridder D, De Mulder G, Verstraeten E, Sunaert S, Moller A. Somatosensory cortex stimulation for deafferentation pain. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2007;97:67–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goto T, Saitoh Y, Hashimoto N, Hirata M, Kishima H, Oshino S, Tani N, Hosomi K, Kakigi R, Yoshimine T. Diffusion tensor fiber tracking in patients with central post-stroke pain; correlation with efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Pain. 2008;140(3):509–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kang BS, Shin HI, Bang MS. Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the hand motor cortical area on central pain after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1766–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ohn SH, Chang WH, Park CH, Kim ST, Lee JI, Pascual-Leone A, Kim YH. Neural correlates of the antinociceptive effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on central pain after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26:344–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jetté F, Côté I, Meziane HB, Mercier C. Effect of single-session repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation applied over the hand versus leg motor area on pain after spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27(7):636–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yılmaz B, Kesikburun S, Yaşar E, Tan AK. The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on refractory neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2014;37(4):397–400.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    De Oliveira RA, de Andrade DC, Mendonça M, Barros R, Luvisoto T, Myczkowski ML, Marcolin MA, Teixeira MJ. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left premotor/dorsolateral prefrontal cortex does not have analgesic effect on central poststroke pain. J Pain. 2014;15(12):1271–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hasan M, Whiteley J, Bresnahan R, MacIver K, Sacco P, Das K, Nurmikko T. Somatosensory change and pain relief induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with central poststroke pain. Neuromodulation. 2014;17(8):731–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kobayashi M, Fujimaki T, Mihara B, Ohira T. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation once a week induces sustainable long-term relief of central poststroke pain. Neuromodulation. 2015;18(4):249–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nurmikko T, MacIver K, Bresnahan R, Hird E, Nelson A, Sacco P. Motor cortex reorganization and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for pain-a methodological study. Neuromodulation. 2016;19:669–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pommier B, Créac’h C, Beauvieux V, Nuti C, Vassal F, Peyron R. Robot-guided neuronavigated rTMS as an alternative therapy for central (neuropathic) pain: clinical experience and long-term follow-up. Eur J Pain. 2016;20(6):907–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Le Déan Y, Brissebrat B, Castel-Lacanal E, De Boissezon X, Marque P. Management of neuropathic central pain by non-invasive brain stimulation and mirror therapy. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;59S:e145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nardone R, Höller Y, Langthaler PB, Lochner P, Golaszewski S, Schwenker K, Brigo F, Trinka E. rTMS of the prefrontal cortex has analgesic effects on neuropathic pain in subjects with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2017;55:20–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhang X, Hu Y, Tao W, Zhu H, Xiao D, Li Y. The effect of motor cortex stimulation on central poststroke pain in a series of 16 patients with a mean follow-up of 28 months. Neuromodulation. 2017;20(5):492–496.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Canavero S, editor. Textbook of therapeutic cortical stimulation. New York: Nova Biomedical; 2009.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fregni F, Boggio PS, Lima MC, Ferreira MJ, Wagner T, Rigonatti SP, Castro AW, Souza DR, Riberto M, Freedman SD, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A. A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury. Pain. 2006;122:197–209.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Boggio PS, Amancio EJ, Correa CF, Cecilio S, Valasek C, Bajwa Z, Freedman SD, Pascual-Leone A, Edwards DJ, Fregni F. Transcranial DC stimulation coupled with TENS for the treatment of chronic pain. A preliminary study. Clin J Pain. 2009;25:691–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Soler D, Kumru H, Vidal J, Fregni F, Tormos JM, Navarro X, Pascual Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and virtual reality (VR) techniques for treatment of neuropathic central pain in spinal cord injury (NP-SCI). Eur J Pain Suppl. 2010;4:105. (A370)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Soler MD, Kumru H, Pelayo R, Vidal J, Tormos JM, Fregni F, Navarro X, Pascual-Leone A. Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation and visual illusion on neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury. Brain. 2010;133:2565–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mori F, Codecà C, Kusayanagi H, Monteleone F, Buttari F, Fiore S, Bernardi G, Koch G, Centonze D. Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on chronic neuropathic pain in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Pain. 2010;11:436–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Antal A, Terney D, Kuehnk S, Paulus W. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation ameliorates chronic pain and reduces short intracortical inhibition. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2010;39:890–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kumru H, Soler D, Vidal J, Navarro X, Tormos JM, Pascual-Leone A, Valls-Sole J. The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation with visual illusion in neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injury: an evoked potentials and quantitative thermal testing study. Eur J Pain. 2013;17(1):55–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Knotkova H, Portenoy RK, Cruciani RA. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) relieved itching in a patient with chronic neuropathic pain. Clin J Pain. 2013;29(7):621–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wrigley PJ, Gustin SM, McIndoe LN, Chakiath RJ, Henderson LA, Siddall PJ. Longstanding neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury is refractory to transcranial direct current stimulation: a randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2013;154(10):2178–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jensen MP, Sherlin LH, Askew RL, Fregni F, Witkop G, Gianas A, Howe JD, Hakimian S. Effects of non-pharmacological pain treatments on brain states. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124:2016–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bae SH, Kim GD, Kim KY. Analgesic effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on central post-stroke pain. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2014;234(3):189–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Yoon EJ, Kim YK, Kim HR, Kim SE, Lee Y, Shin HI. Transcranial direct current stimulation to lessen neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: a mechanistic PET study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;28(3):250–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ngernyam N, Jensen MP, Arayawichanon P, Auvichayapat N, Tiamkao S, Janjarasjitt S, Punjaruk W, Amatachaya A, Aree-uea B, Auvichayapat P. The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with neuropathic pain from spinal cord injury. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;126(2):382–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Morishita T, Hyakutake K, Saita K, Takahara M, Shiota E, Inoue T. Pain reduction associated with improved functional interhemispheric balance following transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke central pain: a case study. J Neurol Sci. 2015;358(1–2):484–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Morishita T, Inoue T. Brain stimulation therapy for central post-stroke pain from a perspective of interhemispheric neural network remodeling. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:166.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ayache SS, Palm U, Chalah MA, Al-Ani T, Brignol A, Abdellaoui M, Dimitri D, Sorel M, Créange A, Lefaucheur JP. Prefrontal tDCS decreases pain in patients with multiple sclerosis. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:147.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Legon W, Sato TF, Opitz A, Mueller J, Barbour A, Williams A, Tyler WJ. Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17(2):322–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Canavero S, Bonicalzi V. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for central pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2005;9:87–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mehta S, McIntyre A, Guy S, Teasell RW, Loh E. Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation for the management of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis. Spinal Cord. 2015;53(11):780–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Antal A, Paulus W. A case of refractory orofacial pain treated by transcranial direct current stimulation applied over hand motor area in combination with NMDA agonist drug intake. Brain Stimul. 2011;4(2):117–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Alm PA, Dreimanis K. Neuropathic pain: transcranial electric motor cortex stimulation using high frequency random noise. Case report of a novel treatment. J Pain Res. 2013;6:479–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Palm U, Chalah MA, Padberg F, Al-Ani T, Abdellaoui M, Sorel M, Dimitri D, Créange A, Lefaucheur JP, Ayache SS. Effects of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on affect, pain and attention in multiple sclerosis. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2016;34(2):189–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Capel ID, Dorrell HM, Spencer EP, Davis MW. The amelioration of the suffering associated with spinal cord injury with subperception transcranial electrical stimulation. Spinal Cord. 2003;41:109–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Tan G, Rintala DH, Thornby JI, Yang J, Wade W, Vasilev C. Using cranial electrotherapy stimulation to treat pain associated with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43:461–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Tan G, Rintala DH, Jensen MP, Richards JS, Holmes SA, Parachuri R, Lashgari-Saegh S, Price LR. Efficacy of cranial electrotherapy stimulation for neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury: a multi-site randomized controlled trial with a secondary 6-month open-label phase. J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34(3):285–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    André-Obadia N, Magnin M, Garcia-Larrea L. On the importance of placebo timing in rTMS studies for pain relief. Pain. 2011;152(6):1233–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Canavero S, Bonicalzi V. Neuromodulation for central pain. Expert Rev Neurother. 2003;3:591–607.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Canavero S, Bonicalzi V, Intonti S, Crasto S, Castellano G. Effects of bilateral extradural cortical stimulation for plegic stroke rehabilitation. Neuromodulation. 2006;9:28–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Nahmias F, Debes C, Ciampi De Andreade D, Mhalla A, Bouhassira D. Diffuse analgesic effects of unilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in healthy volunteers. Pain. 2009;147:224–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Houzè B, Bradley C, Magnin M, Garcia-Larrea L. Changes in sensory hand representation and pain thresholds induced by motor cortex stimulation in humans. Cereb Cortex. 2013;23(11):2667–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sergio Canavero
    • 1
  • Vincenzo Bonicalzi
    • 2
  1. 1.HEAVEN/GEMINI International Collaborative GroupTurinItaly
  2. 2.AOUCittà della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Department of Neurosciences, Rita Levi MontalciniUniversità di TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations