Advertisement

Introduction

  • Awais KhawarEmail author
  • Ahmed Abdelhadi
  • T. Charles Clancy
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering book series (BRIEFSELECTRIC)

Abstract

Cellular network operators are predicting a \(1000\times \) increase in capacity to keep pace with the tremendous growth of aggregate and per-subscriber data traffic [1]. Increased investments in infrastructure, e.g., larger number of small cells, and more spectrally efficient technologies, e.g., LTE-Advanced, can help meet this challenge partially. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is considering a number of options including incentive auctioning and sharing of federal spectrum to meet the commercial spectrum requirements. Of these two, spectrum sharing is a quite promising technology due to the large number of underutilized federal spectrum bands that can be shared with commercial cellular operators to satisfy their growing demands. But spectrum sharing is associated with its inherent set of challenges because the incumbents need to be protected from the harmful interference that can arise due to the operation of other systems in the shared bands.

Keywords

Primary User Secondary User Radar System Federal Communication Commission MIMO Radar 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    W. Lehr, Toward more efficient spectrum management, in MIT Communications Futures Program (2014), pp. 1–31, http://cfp.mit.edu/groups/spectrum-policy.shtml
  2. 2.
    S. Haykin, Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 23, 201–220 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Yucek, H. Arslan, A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 11, 116–130 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Murty, R. Chandra, T. Moscibroda, P.V. Bahl, Senseless: a database-driven white spaces network. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 11, 189–203 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y. Zhao, L. Morales, J. Gaeddert, K. Bae, J.-S. Um, J. Reed, Applying radio environment maps to cognitive wireless regional area networks, in 2nd IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN) (2007), pp. 115–118Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Gao, J. Park, Y. Yang, Uplink soft frequency reuse for self-coexistence of cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 13, 1366–1378 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Khawar, A. Abdel-Hadi, T.C. Clancy, A mathematical analysis of LTE interference on the performance of S-band military radar systems, in 13th Annual Wireless Telecommunications Symposium (WTS) (Washington, DC, USA, 2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Federal Communications Commission (FCC), FCC proposes innovative small cell use in 3.5 GHz band, 12 Dec 2012, http://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-proposes-innovative-small-cell-use-35-ghz-band
  9. 9.
    A. Khawar, I. Ahmad, A.I. Sulyman, Spectrum sharing between small cells and satellites: opportunities and challenges, in IEEE ICC 2015 - Workshop on Cognitive Radios and Networks for Spectrum Coexistence of Satellite and Terrestrial Systems (CogRaN-Sat) (ICC’15 - Workshops 02) (London, UK, 2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Connecting America: The national broadband plan (2010) (Online)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    The Presidents Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), Realizing the full potential of government-held spectrum to spur economic growth (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), An assessment of the near-term viability of accommodating wireless broadband systems in the 1675–1710 MHz, 1755–1780 MHz, 3500–3650 MHz, 4200–4220 MHz, and 4380–4400 MHz bands (Fast Track Report) (2010) (Online)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M.J. Marcus, New approaches to private sector sharing of federal government spectrum. New Am. Found. 26, 1–8 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Federal Communications Commission (FCC), In the matter of revision of parts 2 and 15 of the commissions rules to permit unlicensed national information infrastructure (U-NII) devices in the 5 GHz band. MO&O, ET Docket No. 03-122 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L.S. Wang, J.P. McGeehan, C. Williams, A. Doufexi, Application of cooperative sensing in radar-communications coexistence. IET Commun. 2, 856–868 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S.S. Bhat, R.M. Narayanan, M. Rangaswamy, Bandwidth sharing and scheduling for multimodal radar with communications and tracking, in IEEE Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (2012), pp. 233–236Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Saruthirathanaworakun, J. Peha, L. Correia, Performance of data services in cellular networks sharing spectrum with a single rotating radar, in IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM) (2012), pp. 1–6Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    C. Rossler, E. Ertin, R. Moses, A software defined radar system for joint communication and sensing, in IEEE Radar Conference (RADAR) (2011), pp. 1050–1055Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R.Y.X. Li, Z. Zhang, W. Cheng, Research of constructing method of complete complementary sequence in integrated radar and communication, in IEEE Conference on Signal Processing, vol. 3 (2012), pp. 1729–1732Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    C. Sturm, W. Wiesbeck, Waveform design and signal processing aspects for fusion of wireless communications and radar sensing. Proc. IEEE 99, 1236–1259 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    M.P. Fitz, T.R. Halford, I. Hossain, S.W. Enserink, Towards simultaneous radar and spectral sensing, in IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DYSPAN) (2014), pp. 15–19Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. Sodagari, A. Khawar, T.C. Clancy, R. McGwier, A projection based approach for radar and telecommunication systems coexistence, in IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    X. Chen, X. Wang, S. Xu, J. Zhang, A novel radar waveform compatible with communication,” in International Conference on Computational Problem-Solving (ICCP) (2011), pp. 177–181Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Khawar, A. Abdel-Hadi, T.C. Clancy, Spectrum sharing between S-band radar and LTE cellular system: a spatial approach, in 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks: SSPARC Workshop (IEEE DySPAN 2014 - SSPARC Workshop) (McLean, USA, 2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. Khawar, A. Abdel-Hadi, T.C. Clancy, MIMO radar waveform design for coexistence with cellular systems, in 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks: SSPARC Workshop (IEEE DySPAN 2014 - SSPARC Workshop) (McLean, USA, 2014)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. Khawar, A. Abdelhadi, T.C. Clancy, QPSK waveform for MIMO radar with spectrum sharing constraints, in Physical Communication (2014)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    F. Paisana, J.P. Miranda, N. Marchetti, L.A. DaSilva, Database-aided sensing for radar bands, in IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DYSPAN) (2014), pp. 1–6Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    H. Deng, B. Himed, Interference mitigation processing for spectrum-sharing between radar and wireless communications systems. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 49(3), 1911–1919 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Awais Khawar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ahmed Abdelhadi
    • 2
  • T. Charles Clancy
    • 2
  1. 1.Federated WirelessArlingtonUSA
  2. 2.Virginia TechArlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations