Skip to main content

Elliptic Hypergeometric Functions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Symmetries and Integrability of Difference Equations

Part of the book series: CRM Series in Mathematical Physics ((CRM))

  • 718 Accesses

Abstract

These lecture notes discuss some of the basics of elliptic hypergeometric functions. These are fairly recent generalizations of ordinary hypergeometric functions. In this chapter we first discuss both ordinary hypergeometric functions and elliptic functions, as you need to know both to define elliptic hypergeometric series. We subsequently discuss some of the important properties these series satisfy, in particular we consider the biorthogonal functions found by Spiridonov and Zhedanov, both with respect to discrete and continuous measure. In doing so we naturally encounter the most important evaluation and transformation formulas for elliptic hypergeometric series, and for the associated elliptic beta integral.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    You might ask: What is classical? There are many different definitions based on properties such a classical family should have, which result in different families being called classical or not. As far as I know any definition includes only families from the (q)-Askey scheme, but some are more restrictive. I just use the definition “Everything in the (q-)Askey scheme is classical.”

  2. 2.

    One might observe that the name “contiguous relation” is somewhat of a misnomer. It is not so much that the relation itself is contiguous (which means “next to”) but that it relates functions at parameter values which are contiguous. A better term which is sometimes used, would be “contiguity relation.” However in these notes I prefer to use the terminology of the standard work [1].

References

  1. G.E. Andrews, R. Askey, R. Roy, Special Functions. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 71 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. I.B. Frenkel, V.G. Turaev, Elliptic solutions of the Yang–Baxter equation and modular hypergeometric functions. in The Arnold–Gelfand Mathematical Seminars, ed. by V.I. Arnold, I.M. Gelfand, V.S. Retakh, M. Smirnov (Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1997), pp. 171–204

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Gasper, M. Rahman, Basic Hypergeometric Series, 2nd edn. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 96 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Koekoek, P.A. Lesky, R.F. Swarttouw, Hypergeometric Orthogonal Polynomials and Their q-Analogues. Springer Monographs in Mathematics (Springer, Berlin, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. E.M. Rains, BC n -symmetric Abelian functions. Duke Math. J. 135(1), 99–180 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. E.M. Rains, Transformations of elliptic hypergeometric integrals. Ann. Math. (2) 171(1), 169–243 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Rosengren, Bibilography of Elliptic Hypergeometric Functions. www.math.chalmers.se/~hjalmar/bibliography.html

  8. H. Rosengren, An elementary approach to 6j-symbols (classical, quantum, rational, trigonometric, and elliptic). Ramanujan J. 13(1–3), 131–166 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. S.N.M. Ruijsenaars, First order analytic difference equations and integrable quantum systems. J. Math. Phys. 38(2), 1069–1146 (1997)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. V.P. Spiridonov, An elliptic beta integral, in New Trends in Difference Equations, ed. by S. Elaydi, J. López Fenner, G. Ladas, M. Pinto (Taylor & Francis, London, 2002), pp. 273–282

    Google Scholar 

  11. V.P. Spiridonov, A. Zhedanov, Spectral transformation chains and some new biorthogonal rational functions. Commun. Math. Phys. 210(1), 49–83 (2000)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. E.T. Whittaker, G.N. Watson, A Course of Modern Analysis, 4th edn. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1962)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to express my gratitude to the organizers of ASIDE 2016 for inviting me to speak there. I would also like to thank an anonymous referee for his many useful remarks.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fokko J. van de Bult .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van de Bult, F.J. (2017). Elliptic Hypergeometric Functions. In: Levi, D., Rebelo, R., Winternitz, P. (eds) Symmetries and Integrability of Difference Equations. CRM Series in Mathematical Physics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56666-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics