Abstract
We present a method for an implementation of Multiple Solution Tasks in the classroom in a way that should motivate students to solve problems in different ways. The method concerns a competition in problem solving for groups of students. Each group has to find and record such a solution of a given problem that, in their opinion, appears with the least frequency among the solutions of all groups in the class. For illustration, we present a few problems and corresponding different strategies which arose in the classroom and show how flexibility was demonstrated during a competition . Additionally, we discuss other benefits of including competitions in the classroom, namely creating connections among mathematical concepts and stimulating deeper understanding of concepts for students. For the teacher the method opens a possibility for developing flexibility and analysing the quality of students’ knowledge and their level of understanding of mathematical concepts and relationships among them.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Batanero, C., Navaro-Pelayo, V., & Godino, J. D. (1997). Effect of the implicit combinatorial model on combinatorial reasoning in secondary school pupils. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32, 181–199.
Elia, I., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Kolovou, A. (2009). Exploring strategy use and strategy flexibility in non-routine problem solving by primary school high achievers in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41(5), 605–618.
Leikin, R., & Levav-Waynberg, A. (2007). Exploring mathematics teacher knowledge to explain the gap between theory-based recommendations and school practice in the use of connecting tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 349–371.
Levav-Waynberg, A., & Leikin, R. (2012). The role of multiple solution tasks in developing knowledge and creativity in geometry. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 73–90.
Presmeg, N. C. (1986). Visualisation and mathematical giftedness. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17, 297–311.
Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM-Zentralblatt fuer Didaktik der Mathematik, 3, 75–80.
Warner, L. B., Schorr, R. Y., & Davis, G. E. (2009). Flexible use of symbolic tools for problem solving, generalization, and explanation. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41(5), 663–679.
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract No. APVV-0715-12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Semanišinová, I., Harminc, M., Jesenská, M. (2017). Competition Aims to Develop Flexibility in the Classroom. In: Soifer, A. (eds) Competitions for Young Mathematicians. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56585-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56585-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56584-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56585-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)