Skip to main content

Assessment of Microsoft Kinect in the Monitoring and Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST 2017)

Abstract

Telerehabilitation is an alternative way for physical therapy of stroke patients. The monitoring and correction of exercises can be done through the analysis of body movements recorded by an optical motion capture system. This paper presents a first study to assess the use of Microsoft Kinect in the monitoring and rehabilitation of patients who have suffered a stroke. A comparative study was carried out to assess the accuracy of joint angle measurement with the Microsoft Kinect (for Windows and for Xbox One) and Optitrack™. The results obtained in the first experiment showed a good agreement in the measurements between the three systems, in almost all movements. These results suggest that Microsoft Kinect, a low cost and markerless motion capture system, can be considered as an alternative to complex and high cost motion capture devices for the monitoring and rehabilitation of stroke patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Saini, S., et al.: A low-cost game framework for a home-based stroke rehabilitation system, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, pp. 55–56. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cappozzo, A., et al.: Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. Clin. Biomech. 10(4), 171–178 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Frigo, C., et al.: Functionally oriented and clinically feasible quantitative gait analysis method. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 36(2), 179–185 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baenan, F.A., et al.: Biomechanical validation of upper-body and lower-body joint movements of Kinect motion capture data for rehabilitation treatments, p. 656. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thame, A.C.F., et al.: The Upper limb functional rehabilitation of spastic patients post stroke, Universidade de Sorocaba, pp. 179–181. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alankus, G., Lazar, A., May, M., Kelleher, C.: Towards customizable “games for stroke rehabilitation”, pp. 2113–2122. In: CHI 2010, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burke, J.W., McNeill, M.D., Charles, D.K., Morrow, P.J., Crosbie, J.H., McDonough, S.M.: Optimising engagement for stroke rehabilitation using serious games. Vis. Comput. 25(12), 1085–1099 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Antón, D., et al.: KiReS: a Kinect-based telerehabilitation system, pp. 457–458. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roy, A.K., Soni, Y., Dubey, S.: Enhancing effectiveness of motor rehabilitation using Kinect motion sensing technology, pp. 298–301 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fernández-Baena, A., et al.: Biomechanical validation of upper-body and lower-body joint movements of Kinect motion capture data for rehabilitation treatments, pp. 4–6 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. http://www.xbox.com/en-in/kinect

  12. Gonzalez-Jorge, H., et al.: Metrological comparison between Kinect I and Kinect II sensors. Measurement 70, 22–23 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kinect II Tech Specs. http://123kinect.com/everything-kinect-2-one-place/43136/

  14. Matthew, S.: How does the Kinect 2 compare to the Kinect 1? 6 December 2014. http://zugara.com/how-does-the-kinect-2-compare-to-the-kinect-1/

  15. Wu, G., Siegler, S., Allard, P., Kirtley, C., Leardini, A., Rosenbaum, D., et al., Stan dardization and Terminology Committee of the International Society of Biomechanics: ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion – Part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. J. Biochem. 35(4), 543–548 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wu G., van der Helm, F.C., Veeger, H.E., Makhsous, M., Van Roy, P., Anglin, C., et al., International Society of Biomechanics: ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion – Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J. Biochem. 38(5), 981–992 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bonnechère, B., et al.: Validity and reliability of the Kinect within functional assessment activities: comparison with standard stereophotogrammetry. Gait Posture 39, 594–596 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Clark, R.A., et al.: Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of postural control. Gait Posture 36, 373–375 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fernández-Baena, A., et al.: Biomechanical validation of upper-body and lower-body joint movements of Kinect motion capture data for rehabilitation treatments (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Duan, Z., et al.: Evaluation of Kinect as an analysis tool for kinematic variables of shoulder and spine motions. J. Med. Res. Dev. 4(4), 35–41 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Choppin, S., Lane, B., Wheat, J.: The accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect in joint angle measurement. Sports Technol. 7(1–2), 98–105 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Project “NanoSTIMA: Macro- to-Nano Human Sensing: Towards Integrated Multimodal Health Monitoring and Analytics/NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000016” financed by the North Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, and through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugo Paredes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abreu, J. et al. (2017). Assessment of Microsoft Kinect in the Monitoring and Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients. In: Rocha, Á., Correia, A., Adeli, H., Reis, L., Costanzo, S. (eds) Recent Advances in Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 570. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56538-5_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56538-5_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56537-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56538-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics