Abstract
A natural way of interpreting Archimedes’ account of floatation is by analogy with a balance. When a body is wholly or partially immersed in water it displaces water, which is raised as a result. Floating occurs when the tendency of the raised water to move downwards is balanced by the weight of the body. Galileo came to realize that if this comparison with the balance is to be retained the analogy must be with a balance with unequal rather than equal arms. If a balance with unequal arms is subject to a small displacement about its equilibrium position the resulting velocities of the bodies at the extremities of each arm are inversely proportional to their weight. Likewise, a slight vertical depression of a block of wood floating in a vessel will result in a displacement of water such that the velocity of the displaced wood or water is inversely proportional to its weight. This analysis yields Archimedes principle. However, it is confined to considerations of weight and of vertical displacements, as the approach of Archimedes had been, and was not well-equipped to deal with the isotropic hydrostatic forces noted by Stevin.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Galileo’s early account of floating appears in manuscript notes of Galileo’s gathered under the title De Motu, probably completed during his time at the University of Pisa. An English translation of that work from the Latin, as well as of Le Meccaniche, written early in Galileo’s Paduan period, appears in Drabkin and Drake (1960). Galileo’s early engagement with floating appears on pp. 16–23. Galileo’s debt to Archimedes with particular reference to hydrostatics is documented in Shea (1972, Chapter 1) and in Palmieri (2005).
- 2.
I have used the translation of Galileo’s work on floating bodies in Drake (1981, pp. 18–53). This translation includes the additions that Galileo made in the second edition.
- 3.
This point has the support of Stillman Drake (1981, p. 214), who observes that ‘technical mathematical books were little in demand in Italian universities then, and after Galileo moved to the Florentine court in 1610 he probably had even less access to such books published abroad than when he taught in Padua’.
- 4.
The fact that water rises up one arm of a u-tube when pressed down in the other is common sense only because the capacity of liquids to flow is taken for granted. The same thing does not happen if the water is replaced by sand.
References
Drabkin, I.E., and S. Drake. 1960. On motion and on mechanics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Drake, S. 1981. Cause, experiment and science: A Galilean dialogue incorporating a new English translation of ‘Bodies that stay atop water or move in it’. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Heath, T.L. 1950. The works of Archimedes. New York: Dover.
Palmieri, P. 2005. The cognitive development of Galileo’s theory of buoyancy. Archive for History of Exact Sciences. 59: 89–222.
Shea, William. 1972. Galileo’s intellectual revolution. London: Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chalmers, A.F. (2017). Galileo, Floating Bodies and the Balance. In: One Hundred Years of Pressure. Archimedes, vol 51. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56529-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56529-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56528-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56529-3
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)