Skip to main content

Gerardus Blasius and the Illustrated Amsterdam Observationes from Nicolaas Tulp to Frederik Ruysch

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Professors, Physicians and Practices in the History of Medicine

Part of the book series: Archimedes ((ARIM,volume 50))

Abstract

This essay explores the collections of Observationes, whether medicae or chirurgicae, published in Amsterdam from about 1640 to about 1690, or from Nicolaas Tulp to Frederik Ruysch. Since many Observationes were illustrated, I pay special attention to the role of images, with special emphasis on those representing diseased states. The works by Gerardus Blasius appear especially informative about contemporary practices including clinical teaching, physical examinations, postmortems, collecting, and visual representation.

I thank Joel Silver at the Lilly Library of Indiana University and Ron Sims at the Galter Library at Northwestern for support and assistance. I am grateful to Ellen Dwyer, Ashley Inglehart, Cindy Klestinec, Evan Ragland, Bret Rothstein, Allen Shotwell, and the IU history of medicine reading group for comments on a previous version of this paper. Special thanks to Eric Jorink, who kindly offered a number of valuable comments on an earlier version of this essay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Blasius 1677, 36–7, Observatio 2, for example, deals with a cleft palate.

  2. 2.

    Cook 2007; Pomata 2010, 2011a, b, “A Word of the Empirics” and “Observation Rising”; and Park 2011.

  3. 3.

    Pomata 2010, 2011a, b and 2005.

  4. 4.

    Bartholin 1654, 1657, 1661; and 1663–67. Geneva physician Théophile Bonet assembled a huge number of mostly previously published reports in Sepulchretum (1679); a second expanded edition was edited by Jean-Jacques Manget (1700). See Siraisi 2001a, b, “Segni evidenti” and “Signs and Evidence”; and 2013; Donato 2011; and Weber 2006.

  5. 5.

    Lindeboom 1984, esp. 1294–5, 1668–9, 2004–6. In the following century the illustrated collection Cornelis Trioen, Observationum medico-chirurgicarum fasciculus (1743a) was rendered as Genees- en heelkundige waarneemingen (1743b). Hendrik van Roonhuyse’s work on the diseases of women had a new expanded edition (Amsterdam, 1672). The German was Historischer Heil-Curen in zwey Theile verfassete Anmerckungen (Nürnberg, 1674). See also van Roonhuyse 1676; and van Meek’ren 1675. I will not discuss Observationes anatomicae selectiores by the Collegium privatum Amstelodamensis, which are exclusively devoted to zootomy.

  6. 6.

    Lindeboom, 152–4, 156–8, 1030–2, 1773–74. See Schrader 1674, 207–8, Figures VII–VIII. I omit here the Observationes anatomicae selectiores (Amsterdam, 1667–73) by the Amsterdam Collegium privatum in that they are exclusively anatomical. See Cook 1992, 139.

  7. 7.

    Lindeboom, 807–8, 1865–66. See de Heide 1684, 51–199, esp. 84–5, 112–6, 123–6, 196–9. On de Heide, see Bertoloni Meli 2013a, 219. See also Stalpart vander Wiel 1682, which translates works originally in Dutch.

  8. 8.

    Lindeboom, 1700–1704. See also Kooijmans, esp. 78–9, 82, 88–90, 95–7.

  9. 9.

    Guilhelmus Fabricius from Hilden or Hildanus 1646. On Hildanus, see Jones 1960. Also, Tulp, Observationes (1652), contains XVIII numbered plates and one that is not numbered at 259; the reference to Fabricius Hildanus is at 275. See Dudok van Heel 1998; Temkin 1951; Bertoloni Meli 2015; eadem., “The Rise of Pathological Illustrations: Baillie, Bleuland, and their Collections,” forthcoming in Bulletin for the History of Medicine.

  10. 10.

    See Ogilvie 2006; Kusukawa 2012.

  11. 11.

    See von Gersdorff (1517) and Bauhin 1605, 1312–1313. See also Dackerman 2011, esp. 60–3, 80–1; Siraisi 2001d, “Vesalius and Human Diversity,” 287–327; and Kusukawa, 218–33.

  12. 12.

    See Impey and Macgregor 1985; Findlen 1994; Daston and Park 1998; Jorink 2010, esp. 257–399; Acheson 2010; Ogilvie 2003; Baigrie 1996; Anderson 2009; Soojung-Kim Pang 1997; Dackerman 2011.

  13. 13.

    See Alpers 1983; Olmi 1992, 119–61, esp. 121; Cook 2007, 154–64. On visual genres, see Silver 2006; Swan 2008a, 239–49; eadem 2008, 199–213; eadem., in Dackerman 2011, 186–90; eadem 2008, “The Uses of Botanical Treatises.”

  14. 14.

    Tulp 1652, 271 and title page, 256–8, plate XIII; 258–60, the plate is not numbered, 221–7. See Daston and Park 1998; Bates 2005; Swan 2008b.

  15. 15.

    Tulp 1652, 341–4, at 342; 364–6, 369–71, 283–91, at 284. See Goldschmid 1925, 42–3; Park 2006, ch. 4 and 266; Sappol 2006, 16, Plate 21.

  16. 16.

    See Tulp 1652, 55–60; Bauhin 1621, Appendix, Plate IX; Malpighi, “De polypo cordis. An Annotated Translation”, by John M. Forrester 1995, 480–481; Bertoloni Meli 2001; eadem 2011, 142–9; and Belloni 1956, 28–35.

  17. 17.

    Tulp 1652, 242–4. See Park 1998, 254–71; eadem 2006; Wilkin 2008.

  18. 18.

    van Roonhuyse 1672, 20–21. See Ricci 1949, 138–45; de Moulin 1988, 144–7.

  19. 19.

    van Meek’ren, 49–51, and for the infant affected by omphalocele, 134–6. See the introduction by de Moulin to the facsimile reprint of Job van Meekeren, Heel- en geneeskonstike aenmerkingen 1979; Parapia and Jackson 2008, 32–5; and de Moulin, 142–5, esp. 144.

  20. 20.

    van Meek’ren, 230–6. See Liedtke 2007, 1: 201; Kooijmans, 64, 106; Schouten 1974.

  21. 21.

    van Meek’ren, 51–5.

  22. 22.

    The reference to Fabricius Hildanus is at 52; see also 41, 57, 181–2. See Hildanus, Opera, 511–3, Centuria VI, Observationes XVI–XVIII.

  23. 23.

    van Meek’ren, 364–8.

  24. 24.

    Kerckring, 145–7. See Margócsy 2011, 185–215, esp. 211; Kemp 2010, 192–208, figures 5, 6, 16; Roberts and Tomlinson 1992, 300–305, 309–19; Bertoloni Meli 2011, 147–8; and Goldschmied, 45.

  25. 25.

    See van Miert 2009; Kooijmans 2010; Mooij 1999, esp. 71–6; Cook 2007, ch. 4.

  26. 26.

    See Lindeboom, 156–8; van Miert, 92–3, 164; Beukers 1987–8; Cook 2007, 149–50; Huisman 2009, 128–44; Jorink, 283–9; Bertoloni Meli 2011, 33.

  27. 27.

    Blasius 1677, 82, 84, quotation at 82. See also the Observata anatomica extraordinaria in homine in Blasius 1674, 119.

  28. 28.

    Van Miert, 319–24.

  29. 29.

    Ibid., 93, 122, 320–22. See also Steno 1986, sub indice; Bertoloni Meli 2011, 111–3.

  30. 30.

    Cole 1944, 150–5.

  31. 31.

    Collegium privatum Amstelodamense, Observationes anatomica selectiores (1667, 1673). Facsimile edition with introduction by Lindeboom 1975. See also Cole, 330–41.

  32. 32.

    Cole, 151, 341. See also Blasius, Miscellanea anatomica, address to the reader and 168; Cunningham 1985, 195–222; eadem 2010, 308–40, at 314, 316; Ragland 2008; Bertoloni Meli 2011, 32–3; and eadem 2013.

  33. 33.

    See Lindeboom, 156–8; van Miert 2009, 92–3, 164, 319–24. Amsterdam clinical teaching declined after Blasius.

  34. 34.

    See Mooij, 75; Cook, 149–50; Beukers, 139–45; and Huisman, 145–54.

  35. 35.

    Beukers, 151n25. The full title of the edition of Fernel, Universa medicina, by Otto Heurnius, ends with the words “Cui accedunt casus et observationes rariores quas cl. d. d. Otho Heurnius in diario practico annotavit.” The Latin full titles of Blasius’s works can be found in Appendix 2. See also Bontius 1642, 191–206; and Cook, 191–209, at 194.

  36. 36.

    For example, see Kemp 2010; Sappol 2006. Daston and Galison 2007, ch. 2, argue that before the early nineteenth century, images were abstract representations meant to capture the key features of specimens, what they call “truth-to-nature,” or “characteristic “images of individual representative specimens. Their analysis seems to draw primarily from botany and anatomy but sits awkwardly with early representations of diseased states and monsters. Kusukawa highlights that the canonical body was not attained exclusively from frequency, 219–21, and discusses anatomical works focusing on individual specimens, 239–40.

  37. 37.

    Cole includes many reproductions that are analyzed from a strictly anatomical standpoint. See also Guerrini 2010; Goldschmid; Bertoloni Meli 2015. For a rather clumsy attempt at representing textures, see Vesalius 1543, 2, and the discussion by Long 2011, 58–59.

  38. 38.

    Blasius 1677, address to the reader, 31. See also eadem, Miscellanea anatomica, 307. On van Dortmond, see Kooijmans, 96–8; and Lindeboom, 483–4. References to medical men involved in cures and dissections are ubiquitous: see Blasius 1677, 8, 17, 27, 28, 40–1.

  39. 39.

    French 2001, 133–4. See Blasius, Miscellanea anatomica, 1 and following, which discuss various body parts by dividing the material in sections; and eadem., Medicina universa, 20–1.

  40. 40.

    Blasius 1677: the six sections start at 1 (25 observations), 35 (8 observations), 42 (5 observations), 47 (21 observationes), 61 (7 observations), 73 (25 observations).

  41. 41.

    Ibid., 52–4, 60–1.

  42. 42.

    Tyson 1678–9, 1038. See also Siraisi 2001d, 320.

  43. 43.

    Plate VII in Blasius 1677 shows several malformations of the urinary system.

  44. 44.

    Ibid., 10–11; quotation at 17. Also, eadem., Miscellanea anatomica, 294–5, at 295; and van Meek’ren, 230–6.

  45. 45.

    Blasius 1677, 3–9; van Roonhuyse, 3–12, at 3, plate at 7.

  46. 46.

    Blasius 1677, 19–24.

  47. 47.

    Ibid., 24–5; and eadem., Miscellanea, 307–8.

  48. 48.

    Blasius 1677, 46, 115. See Ragland, 632–3.

  49. 49.

    Kooijmans, 78–82, 88–9, 97, 156, 185. See Lebert 1857–61, 1:6; I translate “iconographie pathologique” as “pathological illustrations,” since the term “iconography” has a more technical meaning in English. Also Sandifort identified Ruysch as an especially significant early source in the history of the visual representation of bone diseases: see Museum anatomicum Academiae Lugduno-Batavae. 4 vols. (the last two were published by his son Gerard) (1793–1835), 2: 4; and eadem. 1691, 127–38.

  50. 50.

    Ruysch 1691, 69 and figure 45. See Kooijmans, 169; Hansen 1996; van de Roemer 2010; Margócsy 2009; Jorink, 319–325; Knoeff 2015; Hendriksen 2015, which offers several important considerations on Ruysch.

  51. 51.

    Ruysch, 45–7; and Schrader, 204–5.

  52. 52.

    Ruysch, 87–8. Notice that in both figures the orientation of the letters does not agree with that of the shadows, supposing the light to be coming from the left.

  53. 53.

    Temkin 1951.

  54. 54.

    Sandifort 1793–1835, vol. 1, quotation at v. See Bertoloni Meli, “The Rise of Pathological Illustrations: Baillie, Bleuland, and their Collections,” forthcoming in Bulletin for the History of Medicine.

  55. 55.

    Ruysch 1691, see for example 88, 90, 100, 108.

  56. 56.

    Kemp 1993, 107–8.

  57. 57.

    See Temkin 1951; Rodari 1996; Goldschmied; Givens et al. 2006.

Bibliography

  • Acheson, Katherine. 2010. Gesner, Topsell, and the Purposes of Pictures in Early Modern Natural Histories. In Printed Images in Early Modern Britain, ed. Michael Hunter, 127–144. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpers, Svetlana. 1983. The Art of Describing: Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Nancy. 2009. Eye and Image: Looking at Visual Studies of Science. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 39: 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baigrie, Brian S., ed. 1996. Picturing Knowledge: Historical and Philosophical Problems Concerning the Use of Art in Science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholin, Thomas. 1654, 1657, 1661. Historiarum anatomicarum rariorum centuriae, 3 vols. Copenhagen: Haubold.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1663–1667. Epistolarum medicinalium centuria IIV, 3 vols. Copenhagen: Typis Matthiæ Godicchenii, impensis Petri Haubold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, Alan W. 2005. Emblematic Monsters: Unnatural Conceptions and Deformed Births in Early Modern Europe. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bauhin, Caspar. 1605. Theatrum Anatomicum. Frankfurt/M: Matthaeus Becker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belloni, Luigi. 1956. Introduzione storica alla patologia dell’aterosclerosi. In Società italiana di patologia, Aterosclerosi umana e sperimentale, 25–66. Milan: Ambrosiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertoloni Meli, D. 2001. Blood, Monsters, and Necessity in Malpighi’s De polypo cordis. Medical History 45: 511–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Mechanism, Experiment, Disease: Marcello Malpighi and Seventeenth-Century Anatomy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013a. Early Modern Experimentation on Live Animals. Journal of the History of Biology 46: 199–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. Of Snails and Horsetails: Anatomical Empiricism in the Early Modern Period. Early Science and Medicine 18: 435–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Visual Representations of Disease: The Philosophical Transactions and William Cheselden’s Osteographia. Huntington Library Quarterly 78 (2): 157–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beukers, Harm. 1987–88. Clinical teaching in Leiden from Its Beginning until the End of the Eighteenth Century. Clio Medica 21: 139–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonet, Théophile. 1679. Sepulchretum; sive anatomia practica, ex cadaveribus morbo denatis. Geneva: Leonard Chouët.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1700. Sepulchretum; sive anatomia practica, ex cadaveribus morbo denatis. Lyon and Geneva: Cramer et Perachon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bontius, Jacobus. 1642. Medicina indorum. Leiden: Franciscus Hackius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Francis Joseph. 1944. A History of Comparative Anatomy. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collegium privatum Amstelodamense. 1975. Observationes anatomica selectiores, facsimile edition, ed. Gerrit Arie Lindeboom. Nieuwkoop: de Graaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Harold J. 1992. The New Philosophy in the Low Countries. In The Scientific Revolution in National Context, ed. Roy Porter and Mikulás Teich, 115–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Matters of Exchange. Commerce, Medicine, and Science in the Dutch Golden Age. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, Andrew. 1985. Fabricius and the ‘Aristotle Project’ in Anatomical Teaching and Research at Padua. In The Medical Renaissance of the Sixteenth Century, ed. Andrew Wear, Roger K. French, and Iain M. Lonie, 195–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. The Anatomist Anatomis’d. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dackerman, Susan, ed. 2011. Prints and the Pursuit of Knowledge in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Art Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine, and Katharine Park. 1998. Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Moulin, Daniel. 1988. A History of Surgery with Emphasis on the Netherlands. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donato, Maria Pia. 2011. Il normale, il patologico, e la sezione cadaverica in età moderna. Quaderni Storici 136: 75–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlen, Paula. 1994. Possessing Nature: Museums, Collecting, and Scientific Culture in Early Modern Italy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, Roger. 2001. Canonical Medicine: Gentile da Foligno and Scholasticism. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmid, Edgar. 1925. Entwicklung und Bibliographie der pathologisch-anatomischen Abbildung. Leipzig: Hiersemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrini, Anita. 2010. The King’s Animals and the King’s Books: The Illustrations for the Paris Academy’s ‘Histoire des animaux’. Annals of Science 67: 383–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Julie V. 1996. Resurrecting Death: Anatomical Art in the Cabinet of Dr. Frederik Ruysch. Art Bulletin 78: 663–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendriksen, Marieke M.A. 2015. Elegant Anatomy: The Eighteenth-Century Leiden Anatomical Collections. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildanus, Guilhelmus Fabricius. 1646. Opera. Frankfurt: Sumptibus J. Beyeri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, Tim. 2009. The Finger of God. Anatomical Practice in Seventeenth-Century Leiden. Leiden: Primavera.

    Google Scholar 

  • Impey, Oliver, and Arthur Macgregor, eds. 1985. The Origins of Museums: The Cabinet of Curiosities in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century Europe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Ellis W. P. 1960. The Life and Works of Guilhelmus Fabricius Hildanus (1560–1634). Medical History 4: 112–134; 196–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorink, Erik. 2010. Reading the Book of Nature in the Dutch Golden Age, 1575–1715. Leiden: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, Martin. 1993. ‘The Mark of Truth’: Looking and Learning in Some Anatomical Illustrations in the Renaissance and Eighteenth Century. In Medicine and the Five Senses, ed. William F. Bynum and Roy Porter, 85–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Style and Non-Style in Anatomical Illustration: From Renaissance Humanism to Henry Gray. Journal of Anatomy 216: 192–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoeff, Rita. 2015. Touching Anatomy: On the Handling of Preparations in the Anatomical Cabinets of Frederik Ruysch (1638–1731). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 49: 32–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooijmans, Luuc. 2010. Death Defied: The Anatomy Lessons of Frederik Ruysch. Leiden: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kusukawa, Sachiko. 2012. Picturing the Book of Nature: Image, Text, and Argument in Sixteenth-Century Human Anatomy and Medical Botany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lebert, Hermann. 1857–61. Traité d’anatomie pathologique générale et speciale, 4 vols. Paris: Ballière.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedtke, Alter. 2007. Dutch Paintings in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2 vols. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindeboom, Gerrit A. 1984. Dutch Medical Biography. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, Pamela. 2011. Artisan/Practitioners and the Rise of the New Science, 1400–1600. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpighi, Marcello. 1995. De polypo cordis. An Annotated Translation, trans. and ed. John M. Forrester, Medical History 39: 477–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margócsy, Daniél. 2009. Advertising Cadavers in the Republic of Letters: Anatomical Publications in Early Modern Netherlands. British Journal of the History of Science 42: 187–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. A Museum of Wonders or a Cemetery of Corpses? The Commercial Exchange of Anatomical Collections in Early Modern Netherlands. In Silent Messengers: The Circulation of Material Objects of Knowledge in the Early Modern Low Countries, ed. Sven Dupré and Christoph Lüthy, 185–215. Berlin: Lit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooij, Annet. 1999. Doctors of Amsterdam. Patient Care, Medical Training and Research (1650–2000). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie, Brian. 2003. Image and Text in Natural History, 1500–1700. In The Power of Images in Early Modern Science, ed. Wolfgang Lefèvre, Jürgen Renn, and Urs Schoepflin, 144–166. Basel: Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. The Science of Describing: Natural History in Renaissance Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olmi, Giuseppe. 1992. L’inventario del mondo. Bologna: il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parapia, Liakat A., and Carolyn Jackson. 2008. Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome–A Historical Review. British Journal of Hæmatology 141: 32–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Katharine. 1998. Impressed Images: Reproducing Wonders. In Picturing Science, Producing Art, ed. Caroline A. Jones and Peter Galison, 254–271. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Secrets of Women: Gender, Generation, and the Origins of Human Dissection. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Observation in the Margins, 500–1500. In Histories of Scientific Observation, ed. Lorraine Daston and Elizabeth Lunbeck, 15–44. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomata, Gianna. 2005. Praxis historialis: The Uses of Historia in Early Modern Medicine. In “Historia”: Empiricism and Erudition in Early Modern Europe, ed. Nancy G. Siraisi and Gianna Pomata, 105–146. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Sharing Cases: The Observationes in Early Modern Medicine. Early Science and Medicine 15: 193–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011a. A Word of the Empirics: The Ancient Concept of Observation and Its Recovery in Early Modern Medicine. Annals of Science 68: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011b. Observation Rising: Birth of an Epistemic Genre, ca. 1500–1650. In Histories of Scientific Observation, ed. Lorraine Daston and Elizabeth Lunbeck, 45–80. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragland, Evan. 2008. Experimenting with Chemical Bodies: Reinier de Graaf’s Investigations of the Pancreas. Early Science and Medicine 13: 615–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricci, James V. 1949. The Development of Gynaecological Surgery and Instruments. Philadelphia: Blakiston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K.B., and J.D.W. Tomlinson. 1992. The Fabric of the Body. European Traditions of Anatomical Illustration. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodari, Florian, ed. 1996. Anatomie de la couleur. L’invention de l’estampe en couleur. Paris/Lausanne: Bibliothèque Nationale de France/Musée Olympique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandifort, Eduard. 1793–1835. Museum anatomicum Academiae Lugduno-Batavae, 4 vols. Leiden: Luchtmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sappol, Michael. 2006. Dream Anatomy. Bethesda: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, Jan. 1974. Johannes Walaeus (1604–1649) and His Experiments on the Circulation of the Blood. Journal of the History of Medicine 29: 259–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, Larry. 2006. Peasant Scenes and Landscapes: The Rise of Pictorial Genres in the Antwerp Art Market. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Siraisi, Nancy. 2001a. Segni evidenti, teoria e testimonianza nelle narrazioni di autopsie del Rinascimento. Quaderni Storici 108: 719–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001b. Signs and Evidence: Autopsy and Sanctity in Late-Sixteenth Century Italy. In Medicine and the Italian Universities, 1250–1600, 356–380. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001c. ‘Remarkable’ Diseases, ‘Remarkable’ Cures, and Personal Experience in Renaissance Medical Texts. In Medicine and the Italian Universities, 226–252. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001d. Vesalius and Human Diversity. In Medicine and the Italian Universities, 287–327. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Communities of Learned Experience: Epistolary Medicine in the Renaissance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soojung-Kim Pang, Alex. 1997. Visual Representation and Post-Constructivist History of Science. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 28: 139–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalpart vander Wiel, Cornelius. 1682. Hondert seldzame aanmerkingen. Amsterdam: n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steno, Nicolaus. 1986. Opere scientifiche, ed. Enrico Coturri, 2 vols. Prato: Cassa di Risparmi e Depositi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, Claudia. 2006. The Uses of Realism in Early Modern Illustrated Botany. In Visualizing Medieval Medicine and Natural History, 1200–1550, ed. Jean A. Givens, Karen M. Reeds, and Alain Touwaide, 239–249. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008a. Making Sense of Medical Collections in Early Modern Holland: The Uses of Wonder. In Making Knowledge in Early Modern Europe: Practices, Objects, and Texts, 1400–1800, ed. Pamela H. Smith and Benjamin Schmidt, 199–213. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008b. The Uses of Botanical Treatises in the Netherlands ca. 1600. In The Art of Natural History: Illustrated Treatises and Botanical Paintings, 1400–1850, ed. Therese O’Malley and Amy R.W. Meyers, 63–81. Washington, DC: National Gallery of Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Illustrated Natural History. In Prints and the Pursuit of Knowledge in Early Modern Europe, ed. Susan Dackerman, 186–190. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Art Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temkin, Owsei. 1951. The Role of Surgery in the Rise of Modern Medical Thought. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 25: 248–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trioen, Cornelis. 1743a. Observationum medico-chirurgicarum fasciculus. Leiden: Petrum van der Eyk et Jacobum van der Kluis.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1743b. Genees- en heelkundige waarneemingen. Leiden: Petrum van der Eyk et Jacobum van der Kluis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, Edward. 1678–79. Anatomical Observations. Philosophical Transactions 12: 1035–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Roemer, G.M. (Bert). 2010. From vanitas to Veneration. The Embellishments in the Anatomical Cabinet of Frederik Ruysch. Journal of the History of Collections 22: 169–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Heel, Sebastien A.C. Dudok. 1998. Nicolaes Tulp: The Life and Work of an Amsterdam Physician and Magistrate in the Seventeenth Century. Amsterdam: Six Art Promotion.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Meekeren, Job. 1979. Heel- en geneeskonstike aenmerkingen. Rotterdam: Alphen aan den Rijn.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Roonhuyse, Hendrik. 1672. Genees en heel-konstige aanmerkingen. Amsterdam: de Weduwe van Theunis Jacobsz.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Miert, Dirk. 2009. Humanism in an Age of Science: the Amsterdam Athenaeum in the Golden Age, 1632–1704. Trans. Michiel Wielema, with Anthony Ossa-Richardson. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesalius, Andreas. 1543. De humani corporis fabrica. Basel: Oporinus.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Gersdorff, Hans. 1517. Feldtbüch der Wundtartzney. Strassburg: Schott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Giorgio. 2006. Sensata veritas: l’affiorare dell’anatomia patologica, ancora innominata, in scritti di anatomisti del ‘500. Florence: Olschki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkin, Rebecca M. 2008. Essaying the Mechanical Hypothesis: Descartes, La Forge, and Malebranche on the Formation of Birthmarks. Early Science and Medicine 13: 533–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Domenico Bertoloni Meli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1: Some of the Main Works Authored or Edited by Gerardus Blasius

  • Gerardus Blasius, De nephritide. Leiden: Moyaert, 1648

  • Johann Vesling, Syntagma anatomicum, commentariis illustratum. Amsterdam: Apud Joannem Janssonium, 1659.

  • Philipp Müller, Miracula chymica et mysteria medica libris quinque enucleata. Ex recensione Gerardi Blasii. Amsterdam: Apud Aegidium Jansonium Valckenier, 1659.

  • Jean Béguin, Tyrocinium chymicum commentariis illustratum à Gerardo Blasio. Amsterdam: Egidium Valkenier and Casper Commelijn, 1659.

  • Gerardus Blasius, Medicina generalis, nova accurataque methodo fundamenta exhibens. Amsterdam: Apud P. van den Berge, 1661.

  • Lorenzo Bellini, Exercitatio anatomica de structura et usu renum, cui renum monstrosorum exempla, ex medicorum celebrium scriptis, addidit Gerardus Blasius. Amsterdam: sumptibus Andreae Frisii, 1665.

  • Pierre Morel, Methodus praescribendi formulas remediorum. Cum adjuncto Materiae medicae systemate. Aucta, variisque modis illustrata, nunc pro 2. ed. recensita a Gerardo Blasio. Amsterdam: Apud Casparum Commelinum, 1665 (also 1680).

  • Fortunio Liceti, De monstris, ex recensione Gerardi Blasii, qui monstra quædam nova & rariora ex recentiorum scriptis addidit. Amsterdam: sumptibus Andreae Frisii, 1665.

  • Gerardus Blasius, Medicina universa; hygieines & therapeutices fundamenta methodo nova brevissime exhibens. Amsterdam: Petrus vanden Berge, 1665.

  • Johann Vesling, Syntagma anatomicum, commentario atque appendice ex veterum, recentiorum, propriisque, observationibus, illustratum et auctum. Amsterdam: apud Joannem Janssonium à Waesberge, 1666.

  • Gerardus Blasius, Anatome medullae spinalis et nervorum inde provenientium. Amsterdam: Apud Casparum Commelinum, 1666.

  • Gerardus Blasius, Anatome contracta in gratiam discipulorum conscripta, & edita. Amsterdam: apud Gerbrandum Schagen, 1666.

  • Gerardus Blasius, Institutionum medicarum compendium, Disputationibus XII in Amstel. Athenaeo publice ventilatis, absolutum. Amsterdam: Petrus van den Bergh, 1667.

  • Gerardus Blasius, Miscellanea anatomica, hominis, brutorumque variorum, fabricam diversam magna parte exhibentia. Amsterdam: Casper Commelijn, 1673.

  • Gerardus Blasius, Observata anatomica in homine, simiâ, equo, vitulo, ove, testudine, echino, glire, serpente, ardeâ, variisque animalibus aliis. Accedunt extraordinaria in homine reperta praxin medicam aeque ac anatomen illustrantia. Leiden: Apud Gaasbeeck, 1674.

  • Gerardus Blasius, Zootomiae, seu anatomes variorum animalium pars prima. Amsterdam: apud Abrahamum Wolfgang, 1676 [i.e. 1677].

  • Gerardus Blasius, Observationes medicae rariores. Accedit monstri triplicis historia. Amsterdam: Apud Abrahamum Wolfgang, 1677.

  • Gerardus Blasius, Medicina curatoria: methodo nova in gratiam discipulorum conscripta. Amsterdam: Apud Henricum & Theodorum Boom, 1680.

  • Gerardus Blasius, Anatome animalium terrestrium variorum, volatilium, aquatilium, serpentum, insectorum, ovorumque, structuram naturalem: ex veterum recentiorum, propriisque observationibus proponens, figuris variis illustrata. Amsterdam: Sumptibus viduæ Joannis à Someren, Henrici & viduæ Theodori Boom, 1681.

  • Thomas Willis, Opera omnia, nitidius, quam unquam hactenus edita, plurimum emendata, indicibus rerum copiosissimis, ac distinctione characterum exornata. Amsterdam: apud Henricum Wetstenium, 1682.

Appendix 2: Illustrated Collections of Observationes, Whether medicae, chirurgicae, or anatomicae, Published in Amsterdam, 1641–1691

  • Tulp, Nicolaas, Observationes medicae. Amsterdam: Apud Ludovicum Elzevirium, 1641. Second expanded edition, 1652. Reprinted in Amsterdam by Daniel Elzevier, 1672 and Henricus Wetstenius, 1685.

  • Roonhuyse, Hendrik van, Heel-konstige aanmerkkingen betreffende de gebreekken der vrowven. Amsterdam: by de Weduwe van Theunis Jacobsz. Lootsman, 1663, second edition 1672.

  • Collegium privatum Amstelodamensis, Observationes anatomicae selectiores. Amsterdam: Apud Casparum Commelinum, 1667–73.

  • Roonhuyse, Hendrik van, Genees en heel-konstige aanmerkingen. Amsterdam: By de Weduwe van Theunis Jacobsz. Lootsman, 1672.

  • Meek’ren, Job van, Heel- en geneeskonstige aanmerkkingen. Amsterdam: Casper Commelijn, 1668. Latin translation by Abraham Blasius, Observationes medico-chirurgicae. Amsterdam: Ex officina Henrici & Viduae Theodori Boom, 1682.

  • Kerckring, Theodor, Spicilegium anatomicum, continens observationum anatomicarum rariorum centuriam unam. Amsterdam: Andreas Frisius, 1670.

  • Justus Schrader, Observationes et historiae omnes et singulae è Guiljelmi Harvei libello ‘De generatione animalium’ ecxerptae, & in accuratissimo ordine redactae … Accedunt ovi faecundi singulis ab incubatione diebus factae inspectiones; ut et observationum anatomico-med[icarum] decades quatuor. Amsterdam: Abraham Wolfgang, 1674.

  • Blasius, Gerardus, Observationes medicae rariores. Accedit monstri triplicis historia. Amsterdam: Abraham Wolfgang, 1677.

  • Blankaart, Steven, Collectanea medico-physica, oft Hollands Jaar-Register der genees-en natuur-kundige Aanmerkingen van gantsch Europa. Amsterdam: Johan ten Hoorn, 1680–6, 3 volumes.

  • Stalpart vander Wiel, Cornelis, Hondert seldzame aanmerkingen so in de genees- als heel- en sny-konst. Amsterdam: Johan ten Hoorn, 1682 (later additions, with Latin and French translations, appeared in The Hague, Leiden, and Paris).

  • de Heide, Antonius, Anatome mytuli, Belgicè mossel, structuram elegantem eius motumque mirandum exponens, nec non centuria observationum medicarum. Amsterdam: Apud Janssonio-Waesbergios, 1683 (some copies dated 1684).

  • Ruysch, Frederik, Observationum anatomico-chirurgicarum centuria: accedit catalogus rariorum, quae in Museo Ruyschiano asservantur. Amsterdam: Apud Henricum & Viduam Theodori Boom, 1691.

  • Bauhin, Caspar. 1621. Theatrum anatomicum. Frankfurt/M: Johann Theodor de Bry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Meli, D.B. (2017). Gerardus Blasius and the Illustrated Amsterdam Observationes from Nicolaas Tulp to Frederik Ruysch. In: Manning, G., Klestinec, C. (eds) Professors, Physicians and Practices in the History of Medicine. Archimedes, vol 50. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56514-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56514-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56513-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56514-9

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics