Abstract
The most applied and widespread approaches for environmental assessments at the organisation level have only recently extended their view beyond the factory gates. Even if they now consider the full value chain, they still mostly concentrate on a single environmental aspect like greenhouse gases (GHGs). While LCA was originally developed for products, its benefits and potential can be extended to the assessment of organisations. Organisational LCA is built on the principles, requirements and guidelines of ISO 14040 and ISO 14044, but requires some adaptations in the scope and inventory phases, when the unit of analysis and the system boundaries are defined. Also, the approach for data collection needs to be fixed. Organisational LCA is a compilation and evaluation of the inputs, outputs and potential environmental impacts of the activities associated with the organisation adopting a life cycle perspective. It includes not only the facilities of the organisation itself, but also the activities upstream and downstream the value chain. This methodology is capable of serving multiple goals at the same time, like identifying environmental hotspots throughout the value chain, tracking environmental performance over time, supporting strategic decisions, and informing corporate sustainability reporting. Several initiatives are on the way for the LCA of organisations: the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative published the ‘Guidance on organizational LCA’, using ISO/TS 14072 as a backbone; moreover, the European Commission launched a guide for the organisation environmental footprint.
References
Clift, R., Wright, L.: Relationships between environmental impacts and added value along the supply chain. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 65, 281–295 (2000)
Downie, J., Stubbs, W.: Evaluation of Australian companies’ scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions assessments. J. Clean. Prod. 56, 156–163 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.09.010
European Commission: Commission recommendation of 9 April 2013 on the use of common methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (2013/179/ EU). Off. J. Eur. Union (2013). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32013H0179. Accessed June 2016
Finkbeiner, M.: Product environmental footprint—breakthrough or breakdown for policy implementation of life cycle assessment? Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 19, 618 (2013). doi:10.1007/s11367-013-0678-x
Finkbeiner, M., König, P.: Carbon footprint and life cycle assessment of organizations. J. Environ. Account. Manag. 1, 55–63 (2013). doi:10.5890/JEAM.2012.01.005
Finkbeiner, M., Wiedemann, M., Saur, K.: A comprehensive approach towards product and organisation related environmental management tools. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 3, 169–178 (1998). doi:10.1007/BF02978825
Galatola, M., Pant, R.: Reply to the editorial “product environmental footprint—breakthrough or breakdown for policy implementation of life cycle assessment?” written by Prof. Finkbeiner (Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(2):266–271). Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 19, 1356–1360 (2014). doi:10.1007/s11367-014-0740-3
Huang, Y.A., Lenzen, M., Weber, C.L., et al.: The role of input–output analysis for the screening of corporate carbon footprints. Econ. Syst. Res. 21, 217–242 (2009). doi:10.1080/09535310903541348
ISO: Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines for Organizational Life Cycle Assessment (ISO/TS 14072). ISO, the International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2014)
ISO: Environmental Management Systems—Requirements with Guidance for Use (ISO 14001: 2015). ISO, the International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2015a)
ISO: ISO Survey 2014. ISO, the International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2015b). http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_survey_executive-summary.pdf?v2014. Accessed June 2016
Makower, J., Mattison, R., Salo, J., Kelley, D.: State of Green Business 2014. GreenBiz Group and Trucost (2014). http://info.greenbiz.com/rs/greenbizgroup/images/state-green-business-2014.pdf. Accessed June 2016
Martínez-Blanco, J., Inaba, A., Finkbeiner, M.: Scoping organizational LCA—challenges and solutions. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 20, 829–841 (2015a). doi:10.1007/s11367-015-0883-x
Martínez-Blanco, J., Lehmann, A., Chang, Y.-J., Finkbeiner, M.: Social organizational LCA (SO-LCA)—an organizational approach to strengthen the implementation of S-LCA. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 20, 1586–1599 (2015b). doi:10.1007/s11367-015-0960-1
Martínez-Blanco, J., Inaba, A., Finkbeiner, M.: Life cycle assessment of organizations. In: Finkbeiner, M. (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Life Cycle Assessment. Springer, Dodrecht (2016). (Vol. 7, Special Forms of LCA)
Milà i Canals, L., Sim, S., García-Suárez, T., et al.: Estimating the greenhouse gas footprint of Knorr. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 16, 50–58 (2011). doi:10.1007/s11367-010-0239-5
Natura: Natura report 2013 (2014). http://natu.infoinvest.com.br/ptb/4888/Relatrioanualemingls.pdf. Accessed June 2016
Taylor, A.P., Postlethwaite, D.: Overall business impact assessment (OBIA). In: Proceedings of the 4th SETAC LCA Case Study Symposium, Brussels, Belgium (1996)
UNEP: Greening the Economy Through Life Cycle Thinking: Ten Years of the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. Life Cycle Initiative, United Nations Environment Programme and Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Paris (2012)
UNEP: Guidance on Organizational Life Cycle Assessment. Life-Cycle Initiative, United Nations Environment Programme and Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Paris (2015). http://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/o-lca_24.4.15-web.pdf. Accessed June 2016
UNEP/SETAC: Life cycle initiative website (2016). www.lifecycleinitiative.org. Accessed June 2016
UN Environment: Road testing Organizational Life Cycle Assessment around the world: Applications, experiences and lessons learned. Life-Cycle Initiative, United Nations Environment Programme and Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Paris (2017)
Unilever: Unilever sustainable living plan 2014: scaling for impact (2015). https://www.unilever.co.uk/Images/uslp-2014-uk-ire.compressed–3-_tcm1252-469820_1_en.pdf. Accessed June 2016
WRI and WBCSD: Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard—Supplement to the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard. World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2011). http://www.ghgprotocol.org/files/ghgp/Corporate%20Value%20Chain%20(Scope%203)%20Accounting%20and%20Reporting%20Standard.pdf. Accessed June 2016
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martínez-Blanco, J., Finkbeiner, M. (2018). Organisational LCA. In: Hauschild, M., Rosenbaum, R., Olsen, S. (eds) Life Cycle Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56474-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56475-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)