Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 355))

  • 456 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we present another interesting model of games with a bilateral relation among the agents different to the communication model [6] (see Chap. 4) and the a priori unions one [7] (see Chap. 5). Hierarchical structures appears in a lot of human systems: firms, economic organizations, social networks, economic networks, protocolos... We consider several models in the literature with a same line which can be studied from bilateral relations. Gilles et al. [4] in 1992 introduced the conjunctive approach of permission structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The concept of hierarchy in van den Brink [8] for instance involves transitivity, reflexivity and also only one top in the structure.

  2. 2.

    van den Brink [9] introduced another approach, the disjunctive one, for hierarchical permission structures. The fuzzy version of the model has been studied in Gallardo et al. [2] in the context of authorization structures (a broader field for hierarchical structures which are not necessarily bilateral relations).

  3. 3.

    They introduced the model as the permission one in Gilles et al. [4], we present the model in a local way, as the permission one in [11]. It is also posible to define a coercive option in the conjunctive sense.

  4. 4.

    The concept of inessential player here differs of the definition in [1, 11], because player i may not be active.

  5. 5.

    van den Brink [8] called this axiom weakly inessential player because he used another stronger version for the disjunctive approach.

  6. 6.

    This axiom is named strong necessary player in [11] and slight different of this one in [1].

  7. 7.

    Furthermore this option is not yet available in the literature.

  8. 8.

    This axiom is not satisfied for all extension pl.

  9. 9.

    This axiom is also not satisfied for any extension pl.

References

  1. Gallardo, J.M., Jiménez, N., Jiménez-Losada, A., Lebrón, E.A.: Games with fuzzy permission structure: a conjunctive approach. Inf. Sci. 278, 510–519 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Gallardo, J.M., Jiménez, N., Jiménez-Losada, A., Lebrón, E.A.: Games with fuzzy authorization structure. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 272, 115–125 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Gallardo, J.M.: Values for games with authorization structure. Ph.D. thesis. University of Seville. Spain (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gilles, R.P., Owen, G., van den Brink, R.: Games with permission structures: the conjunctive approach. Int. J. Game Theory 20(3), 277–293 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Huettner, F., Wiese, H.: The need for permission, the power to enforce, and duality in cooperative games with a hierarchy. Int. Game Theory Rev. 18, 4 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Myerson, R.B.: Graphs and cooperation in games. Math. Oper. Res. 2(3), 225–229 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Owen, G.: Values of games with a priori unions. In: Henn, R., Moeschlin, O. (eds.) Mathematical Economics and Game Theory. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 141, pp. 76–88. Springer, Berlin (1982)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. van den Brink, R.: Relational power in hierarchical organizations. Ph.D. thesis. Tilburg University. The Netherlands (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. van den Brink, R.: An axiomatization of the disjunctive permission value for games with a permission structure. Int. J. Game Theory 26, 27–43 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. van den Brink, R., Gilles, R.P.: Axiomatizations of the conjunctive permission value for games with permission structures. Games Econ. Behav. 12, 113–126 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. van den Brink, R., Dietz, C.: Games with a local permission structure: separation of authorization and value generation. Theory Decision 76(3), 343–361 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrés Jiménez-Losada .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jiménez-Losada, A. (2017). Fuzzy Permission. In: Models for Cooperative Games with Fuzzy Relations among the Agents. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 355. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56472-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56472-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56471-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56472-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics