Hydro-multipoint Forming, a Challenge in Sheet Metal Forming

  • Viorel PanuoiuEmail author
  • Doina Boazu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


The Hydro-Multipoint Forming is a new technology for sheet metal manufacturing appeared as a response to the demands of the global marketplace toward batch and customized production. The technology is a combination between two metal forming processes multipoint forming and hydroforming. The Hydro-Multipoint Forming reconfigurability is assured mainly by the flexible surface of deformation, generated by the axial moving of a number of pins, from the pins network. Using the hydraulic pressure the necessary force to deform the material along the reconfigurable surface of deformation is obtained. In the paper the elements of the new Hydro-Multipoint Forming technology are presented. A simulation model is developed. The model is created using FEM, and both the interpolator associated with the pressure chamber and the interpolator between the pins and the blank are considered. The process of deformation is analyzed in terms of strains, stresses and prevalent defects, respectively dimpling and wrinkling. Using an experimental tool for Hydro-Multipoint Forming the material deformation is analyzed considering the geometrical variations. Finally, a discussion of the numerical and experimental results is made and limits and possibilities for future process improvements are highlighted.


Multipoint forming Reconfigurable technology Hydroforming FEM 


  1. 1.
    Papazian J (2002) Tools of change. Mech Eng 31–40Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hardt DE, Norfleet NA, Valentin VM, Parris A (2001) In-process control of strain in a stretch forming process. Trans ASME 123Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Valjavec M, Hardt DE (1999) Closed-loop shape control of the stretch forming process over a reconfigurable tool: precision airframe skin fabrication. In: Proceedings of the ASME symposium on advances in metal forming, Nashville, November 1999Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Walczyk DF, Hardt DE (1998) Design and analysis of reconfigurable discrete dies for sheet metal forming. J Manuf Syst 17(6):436–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu W, Yang Y-Y, Li M-Z (2010) Numerical simulation of multipoint stretch forming and controlling on accuracy of formed workpiece. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50:61–66. doi: 10.1007/s00170-009-2501-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paunoiu V (2014) New approaches for springback-based offline dimensional control in sheet metal forming. Indian J Eng Mater Sci 303–310. ISSN: 0971-4588Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang S, Cai Z, Li M, Numerical investigation of the influence of punch element in multi-point stretch forming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 49:475–483. doi: 10.1007/s00170–009–2420-1
  8. 8.
    Zhang Q, Dean TA, Wang ZR (2006) Numerical simulation of deformation in multi-point sandwich forming. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:699–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang Q, Wang ZR, Deana TA (2007) Multi-point sandwich forming of a spherical sector with tool-shape compensation. J Mater Process Technol 194:74–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paunoiu V, Cekan P, Gavan E, Nicoara D (2008) Numerical simulations in reconfigurable multipoint forming. Int J Mater Form Suppl 1:181–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cai ZY, Li MZ (2006) Digitized die forming system for sheet metal and springback minimizing technique. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28:1089–1096Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cai ZY, Wang SH, Li MZ (2008) Numerical investigation of multipoint forming process for sheet metal: wrinkling, dimpling and springback. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37(9–10):927–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davoodi B, Zareh-Desari B (2014) Assessment of forming parameters influencing spring-back in multipoint forming process: a comprehensive experimental and numerical study. Mater Des 59:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Paunoiu V, Cekan P, Banu M, Epureanu A, Nicoara D (2008) Simulation of the combined reconfigurable multipoint forming and rubber forming. In: Special edition metal forming conference 2008, Steel Research International, vol 1 no 79. ISSN 1611-3683Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Siegert K, Haussermann M, Losch B, Rieger R (2000) Recent developments in hydroforming technology. J Mater Process Technol 98:251–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lang LH, Wang ZR, Yuan SJ, Zhang SH, Danckert J, Nielsen KB (2004) Hydroforming highlights: sheet hydroforming and tube hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 151:165–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hama T, Hatakeyama T, Asakawa M, Amino H, Makinouchi A, Fujimoto H, Takuda H Finite-element simulation of the elliptical cup deep drawing process by sheet hydroforming. J Finite Elem Anal Des 43(3):234–246Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Del Prete A, Anglani A, Primo T, Spagnolo A (2008) Computer aided simulation as valid tool for sheet hydroforming process development. Int J Mater Form 1:317–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vollertsen F, Breede R, Lange K (1999) Method for deep drawing with multiple elastomer membranes. CIRP Ann Manufact Technol 48(1):221–226 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paunoiu V, Baroiu N, Maier C, Epureanu A, Marinescu V (2011) Reconfigurable deep drawing equipment, Patent number RO 128719-A2Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Finckenstein EV, Kleiner M (1991) Flexible numerically & controlled tool system for hydro-mechanical deep drawing. Ann CIRP 40:311–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu W, Chen YZ, Xu YC, Yuan SJ, Evaluation on dimpling and geometrical profile of curved surface shell by hydroforming with reconfigurable multipoint tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol doi: 10.1007/s00170-015-8264-y
  23. 23.
    Paunoiu V, Teodor V, Baroiu N (2015) The Hydro-Multipoint forming process of complex sheet metal parts. J Mach Eng 15(3):16–116, ISSN 1895-7595Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Selmi N, BelHadjSalah H (2013) Finite element and experimental investigation of the multipoint flexible hydroforming. Key EngMater 554–557:1290–1297. doi: 10.4028/ Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Selmi N, BelHadjSala H Ability of the flexible hydroforming using segmented tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi: 10.1007/s00170-016-9160-9
  26. 26.
    Osakada K (1997) Effects of strain rate and temperature in forming processes of metals. J Phys IV Colloq 07(C3), C3-XXXVII–C3-XLIVGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ansys/Autodyn version 11.0, User documentation (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringDunarea de Jos University of GalatiGalatiRomania

Personalised recommendations