High-Precision Machining of Hard Steel Parts Using Special Abrasive Operations

  • Wit GrzesikEmail author
  • Krzysztof Żak
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


This paper presents the comprehensive approach to the determination of the geometrical and functional characteristics of surface topographies generated on hardened steel parts of about 60 HRC hardness by high-precision cutting and abrasive operations. The initial surfaces were prepared by hard turning (HT) and then finished by precision hard turning (PHT), wheel (WG) and belt (BG) grinding operations. The three surfaces were finished to obtain the Sa roughness parameter of about 0.2 μm after HT and WG operations and 0.04 μm after BG operation. Surface roughness was characterized using the standard 2D and 3D roughness parameters and the fractal and motif parameters. Some important correlations between roughness parameters and surface functional properties are revealed. This study is a part of the research project devoted to the characterization of functional surfaces produced by cutting, abrasive and burnishing operations. The results obtained in the comparative study including hard turning, belt grinding and ball burnishing operations are presented in [1].


Hard turning Wheel grinding Belt grinding Surface topography Surface roughness 


  1. 1.
    Grzesik W, Rech J, Żak K (2015) High-precision finishing hard steel surfaces using cutting, abrasive and burnishing operations. Proc Manuf 1:619–627Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jiang XJ, Whitehouse DJ (2012) Technological shifts in surface metrology. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(2):815–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leach R (2013) Characterization of areal surface texture. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klocke F (2011) Manufacturing processes 1. Cutting. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davim JP (2011) Machining of hard materials. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klocke F, Brinksmeier E, Weinert K (2005) Capability profile of hard cutting and grinding processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 54(2):557–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grzesik W, Rech J, Wanat T (2007) Surface finish on hardened bearing steel parts produced by superhard and abrasive tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(2):255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grzesik W, Żak K (2012) Modification of surface finish produced by hard turning using superfinishing and burnishing operations. J Mater Process Technol 212(1):315–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grzesik W, Żak K, Kiszka P (2014) Comparison of surface textures generated in hard turning and grinding operations. Proc CIRP 13:84–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grzesik W, Żak K (2015) Possibilities of the generation of hardened steel parts with defined topographic characteristics of the machined surfaces. J Manuf Sci Eng 137(1):014502-1-014502-5. doi: 10.1115/1.4028895
  11. 11.
    Griffiths B (2001) Manufacturing surface technology. Surface integrity and functional performance. Penton Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hashimoto F, Guo YB, Warren AW (2008) Surface integrity difference between hard turned and ground surfaces and its impact on fatigue life. Ann CIRP 55(1):81–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Michigan Metrology 3D surface roughness and wear measurements, analysis and inspection. Available at

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Production Automation, Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringOpole University of TechnologyOpolePoland

Personalised recommendations