Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Interesting Are Suggestions of Coupled File Changes for Software Developers?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering (ENASE 2016)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 703))

  • 295 Accesses

Abstract

Software repositories represent a data source from which we can extract interesting information to be presented to the developers working on their maintenance tasks. Various studies use the software repositories to extract sets of files that changed frequently in the past. However, they do not consider feedback from developers on whether they would like to use this kind of information. The aim of our research is to support developers in maintenance tasks using suggestions which other files they should also change. We investigate three software repositories to find coupled file changes to support the software developers. We also propose a set of attributes from the versioning system, the issue tracking system and the project documentation. We contrast our findings with the feedback gathered using survey and interviews with the developers. According to our results, small repositories make an insightful analysis difficult. Both from experienced and inexperienced developers, the feedback was mostly neutral. Most of the attributes we proposed were accepted as interesting by the developers. Furthermore, developers also suggested other additional issues to be relevant, e.g. the context of the coupled changes. Generally, developers did not reject the coupled file changes suggestions. However, the presentation form of coupled changes and context information need to be taken into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://git-scm.com/.

  2. 2.

    http://mercurial.selenic.com/.

  3. 3.

    https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira.

  4. 4.

    http://www.redmine.org/.

  5. 5.

    All questions are available on http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15065.

  6. 6.

    http://www.philippe-fournier-viger.com/spmf.

  7. 7.

    http://www.atlasti.com/index.html.

  8. 8.

    The analysis results are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15065.

References

  1. Agrawal, R., Srikant, R.: Fast algorithms for mining association rules in large databases. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB 1994, pp. 487–499 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bavota, G., Dit, B., Oliveto, R., Di Penta, M., Poshyvanyk, D., De Lucia, A.: An empirical study on the developers perception of software coupling. In: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2013, pp. 692–701 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bieman, J., Andrews, A., Yang, H.: Understanding change-proneness in OO software through visualization. In: 11th IEEE International Workshop on Program Comprehension, pp. 44–53, May 2003

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bird, C., Rigby, P.C., Barr, E.T., Hamilton, D.J., Germán, D.M., Devanbu, P.T.: The promises and perils of mining git. In: MSR, pp. 1–10 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Canfora, G., Cerulo, L.: Impact analysis by mining software and change request repositories. In: 11th IEEE International Symposium on Software Metrics, p. 29, September 2005

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carlsson, E.: Mining git repositories: an introduction to repository mining (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. D’Ambros, M., Lanza, M., Robbes, R.: On the relationship between change coupling and software defects. In: WCRE, pp. 135–144 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fischer, M., Pinzger, M., Gall, H.: Populating a release history database from version control and bug tracking systems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance, ICSM 2003, p. 23 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fluri, B., Gall, H., Pinzger, M.: Fine-grained analysis of change couplings. In: Fifth IEEE International Workshop on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation, pp. 66–74, September 2005

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fournier-Viger, P.: How to auto-adjust the minimum support threshold according to the data size (2013). http://data-mining.philippe-fournier-viger.com/

  11. Frawley, W.J., Piatetsky-shapiro, G., Matheus, C.J.: Knowledge discovery in databases: an overview (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gall, H., Jazayeri, M., Krajewski, J.: CVS release history data for detecting logical couplings. In: Proceedings of Sixth International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, pp. 13–23, September 2003

    Google Scholar 

  13. German, D.M.: Mining CVS repositories, the softchange experience. In: 1st International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories, pp. 17–21 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Győrödi, C., Győrödi, R.: A comparative study of association rules mining algorithms (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Han, J., Mining, D.: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Han, J., Pei, J., Yin, Y., Mao, R.: Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation: a frequent-pattern tree approach. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 8(1), 53–87 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Hassan, A.E., Holt, R.C.: Predicting change propagation in software systems. In: Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, ICSM 2004, pp. 284–293 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hattori, L., dos Santos Jr., G., Cardoso, F., Sampaio, M.: Mining software repositories for software change impact analysis: a case study. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Brazilian Symposium on Databases, SBBD 2008, pp. 210–223 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kagdi, H., Collard, M.L., Maletic, J.I.: A survey and taxonomy of approaches for mining software repositories in the context of software evolution. J. Softw. Maint. Evol. 19(2), 77–131 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kagdi, H., Yusuf, S., Maletic, J.I.: Mining sequences of changed-files from version histories. In: Proceedings of the 2006 International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories, MSR 2006, pp. 47–53 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Loeliger, J.: Version Control with Git - Powerful Techniques for Centralized and Distributed Project Management. O’Reilly, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. McGarry, K.: A survey of interestingness measures for knowledge discovery. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 20(1), 39–61 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramadani, J., Wagner, S.: Are suggestions of coupled file changes interesting? In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Software Approaches to Software Engineering, pp. 15–26 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Revelle, M., Gethers, M., Poshyvanyk, D.: Using structural and textual information to capture feature coupling in object-oriented software. Empirical Softw. Engg. 16(6), 773–811 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Runeson, P., Höst, M.: Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical Softw. Engg. 14(2), 131–164 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sayles, J., et al.: z/OS Traditional Application Maintenance and Support. IBM Redbooks (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shirabad, J., Lethbridge, T., Matwin, S.: Mining the maintenance history of a legacy software system. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Software Maintenance, ICSM 2003, pp. 95–104, September 2003

    Google Scholar 

  28. Steven, J., Zach, W.: Bad commit smells (2013). http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~sjj/docs/commits.pdf

  29. Stevens, W.P., Myers, G.J., Constantine, L.L.: Structured design. IBM Syst. J. 13(2), 115–139 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Strauss, A., Corbin, J.M.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications, USA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  31. van Rysselberghe, F., Demeyer, S.: Mining version control systems for FACs (frequently applied changes). In: the International Workshop on Mining Repositories, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wu, R., Zhang, H., Kim, S., Cheung, S.-C.: Relink: recovering links between bugs and changes. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSOFT Symposium and the 13th European Conference on Foundations of Software Engineering, ESEC/FSE 2011, pp. 15–25 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ying, A.T.T., Murphy, G.C., Ng, R.T., Chu-Carroll, M.: Predicting source code changes by mining change history. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 30(9), 574–586 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zimmermann, T., Kim, S., Zeller, A., Whitehead, Jr., E.J.: Mining version archives for co-changed lines. In: Proceedings of the 2006 International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories, MSR 2006, pp. 72–75 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zimmermann, T., Weisgerber, P., Diehl, S., Zeller, A.: Mining version histories to guide software changes. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2004, pp. 563–572 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Asim Abdulkhaleq for his help in the interview transcripts and coding for the Grounded Theory analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Software Technology, University of Stuttgart, Universitätstraße 38, Stuttgart, Germany

    Jasmin Ramadani & Stefan Wagner

Authors
  1. Jasmin Ramadani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefan Wagner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jasmin Ramadani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Wrocław University of Economics, Wrocław, Poland

    Leszek A. Maciaszek

  2. INSTICC and Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal

    Joaquim Filipe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ramadani, J., Wagner, S. (2016). How Interesting Are Suggestions of Coupled File Changes for Software Developers?. In: Maciaszek, L., Filipe, J. (eds) Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering. ENASE 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 703. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56390-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56390-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56389-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56390-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation