Skip to main content

Framing Workplace Innovation Through an Organisational Psychology Perspective: A Review of Current WPI Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Workplace Innovation

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss the potential advantages of taking a work and organisational psychology (WOP) perspective on Workplace Innovation (WPI). WPI represents a construct that can be applied at different organisational levels and be considered from multiple inter-related perspectives. Accordingly, this contribution takes a systemic perspective on WPI. Such an approach suggests that multiple disciplines have something to contribute to our understanding of WPI and this chapter aims to show how research in WPI can benefit from a WOP perspective. Accordingly, a main goal of this chapter is to recognize how organisational and work-related dynamics influence the effectiveness of WPI practices, an issue that will be examined by means of recent WPI studies analysed from a WOP perspective. In doing so, we seek to encourage perspectives on WPI and research in WOP to be merged, in order to promote a deeper investigation of the predictors and consequences of WPI, as well as a greater understanding of factors influencing the effectiveness of WPI practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The authors wish to thank Marta Strumińska-Kutra for this precious argumentation.

References

  • Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A., Demerouti, E., & Verbeke, W. (2004). Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and performance. Human Resource Management, 43, 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13, 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., de Boer, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2003a). Job demands and job resources as predictors of absence duration and frequency. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 341–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Euwema, M. C. (2005). Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 170–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., Taris, T. W., Schaufeli, W. B., & Schreurs, P. J. (2003b). A multigroup analysis of the job demands-resources model in four home care organizations. International Journal of Stress Management, 10, 16–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauregard, T. A., & Henry, L. C. (2009). Making the link between work-life balance practices and organizational performance. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, F. W., & Flaxman, P. E. (2006). The ability of psychological flexibility and job control to predict learning, job performance, and mental health. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 26, 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxall, P., & Macky, K. (2007). High-performance work systems and organisational performance: Bridging theory and practice. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 45, 261–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2016). Strategy and human resource management (4th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Busck, O., Knudsen, H., & Lind, J. (2010). The transformation of employee participation: Consequences for the work environment. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 31, 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J. N., & Chang, J. Y. (2009). Innovation implementation in the public sector: An integration of institutional and collective dynamics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 245–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. E., & Cherns, A. (1975). The quality of working life. Problems, prospects, and the state of the art. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jonge, J., & Kompier, M. A. (1997). A critical examination of the demand-control-support model from a work psychological perspective. International Journal of Stress Management, 4, 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 802–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demerouti, E. (2015). Design your own job through job crafting. European Psychologist, 19, 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2006). Employee well-being and job performance: Where we stand and where we should go. In J. Houdmont & S. McIntyre (Eds.), Occupational health psychology: European perspectives on research, education and practice (Vol. 1, pp. 83–111). Maia: ISMAI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499–512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dhondt, S., Pot, F., & Kraan, K. (2014). The importance of organizational level decision latitude for well-being and organizational commitment. Team Performance Management, 20, 307–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhondt, S., & Van Hootegem, G. (2015). Reshaping workplaces: Workplace innovation as designed by scientists and practitioners. European Journal of Workplace Innovation, 1, 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eeckelaert, L., Dhondt, S., Oeij, P., Pot, F., Nicolescu, G., Webster, J., et al. (2012). Review of workplace innovation and its relation with occupational safety and health. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruman, J. A., & Saks, A. M. (2011). Performance management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, I. M., & Trygstad, S. C. (2009). Local flexicurity: Resolving the conflict between direct and representative participation. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 15, 557–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holman, D., Frenkel, S., Sørensen, O., & Wood, S. (2009). Work design variation and outcomes in call centers: Strategic choice and institutional explanations. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 62, 510–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holman, D., Totterdell, P., Axtell, C., Stride, C., Port, R., Svensson, R., et al. (2012). Job design and the employee innovation process: The mediating role of learning strategies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1332–1356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karasek, R., & Theorell, T. (1992). Healthy work: Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K. J., Conn, A. B., & Sorra, J. S. (2001). Implementing computerized technology: An organizational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 811–824.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, H., Busck, O., & Lind, J. (2011). Work environment quality: The role of workplace participation and democracy. Work, Employment and Society, 25, 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martel, J.-P., & Dupuis, G. (2006). Quality of work life: Theoretical and methodological problems, and presentation of a new model and measuring instrument. Social Indicators Research, 77, 333–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oeij, P., & Vaas, F. (2016). Effect of workplace innovation on organisational performance and sickness absence. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 12, 101–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oeij, P., de Vroome, E., Bolland, A., Gründemann, R., & van Teeffelen, L. (2014). Investing in workplace innovation pays off for SMEs: A regional innovation initiative from The Netherlands. International Journal of Social Quality, 4, 86–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oeij, P., Žiauberyté-Jakštiené, R., Dhondt, S., Corral, A., Totterdill, P., & Preenen, P. (2015). Workplace innovation in European companies. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oeij, P. R., Dhondt, S., Kraan, K., Vergeer, R., & Pot, F. (2012). Workplace innovation and its relations with organisational performance and employee commitment. LLinE, Lifelong Learning in Europe, 4, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, G. R., Hackman, J. R., & Pearce, J. L. (1976). Conditions under which employees respond positively to enriched work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 395–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. K. (2003). Longitudinal effects of lean production on employee outcomes and the mediating role of work characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 620–634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D., & Jackson, P. R. (1997). “That’s not my job”: Developing flexible employee work orientations. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 899–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pot, F. D., & Koningsveld, E. A. (2009). Quality of working life and organizational performance-two sides of the same coin? Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 35, 421–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preenen, P. T., Oeij, P. R., Dhondt, S., Kraan, K. O., & Jansen, E. (2016). Why job autonomy matters for young companies’ performance: Company maturity as a moderator between job autonomy and company performance. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 12, 74–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preenen, P. T., Vergeer, R., Kraan, K., & Dhondt, S. (2015). Labour productivity and innovation performance: The importance of internal labour flexibility practices. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, R. L., Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. (2001). The assimilation of knowledge platforms in organizations: An empirical investigation. Organization Science, 12, 117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos, J., Anderson, N., Peiró, J. M., & Zijlstra, F. (2016). Studying innovation in organizations: A dialectic perspective—Introduction to the special issue. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25, 477–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D. M., & Hoag, A. M. (2004). People and information technology in the supply chain: Social and organizational influences on adoption. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34, 102–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiró, J. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1217–1227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnall, P., Landsbergis, P., & Baker, D. (1994). Job strain and cardiovascular disease. Annual Review of Public Health, 15, 381–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. (2000). Performance productivity and quality of frontline employees in service organizations. Journal of Marketing, 64, 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, R., Chen, G., & Lepak, D. P. (2009). Through the looking glass of a social system: Cross-level effects of high-performance work systems on employees’ attitudes. Personnel Psychology, 62, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taris, T. W., Kompier, M. A., De Lange, A. H., Schaufeli, W. B., & Schreurs, P. J. (2003). Learning new behaviour patterns: A longitudinal test of Karasek’s active learning hypothesis among Dutch teachers. Work & Stress, 17, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Doef, M., & Maes, S. (1999). The job demand-control (-support) model and psychological well-being: A review of 20 years of empirical research. Work and Stress, 13, 87–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, D., & Nichols, T. (2007). Worker representation and workplace health and safety. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. (2007). How job and personal resources influence work engagement and financial turnover: A diary study in a Greek fast–food company. International Journal of Stress Management, 14, 121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, H., Dekker, R., & Kleinknecht, A. (2011). Flexible labor and innovation performance: Evidence from longitudinal firm-level data. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20, 941–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank editor Diana Rus who provided insight and comments that greatly improved the manuscript.

The authors and publisher gratefully acknowledge the following permission to use the material in this book: Arianna Costantini, Riccardo Sartori & Andrea Ceschi, Reviewing psychological facets of workplace innovation In: European Work and Organizational Psychology in Practice. Special issue on Workplace Innovation, 2017, Volume 1, 6–18.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arianna Costantini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Costantini, A., Sartori, R., Ceschi, A. (2017). Framing Workplace Innovation Through an Organisational Psychology Perspective: A Review of Current WPI Studies. In: Oeij, P., Rus, D., Pot, F. (eds) Workplace Innovation. Aligning Perspectives on Health, Safety and Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56333-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics