Skip to main content

Workplace Innovation Context in Poland: Between Structure and Agency

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Workplace Innovation

Abstract

The cultural and institutional context in Poland can influence patterns supportive for workplace innovation. Highlighting technological innovation only and neglecting the workplace improvement in the case of Poland is associated with low work engagement. It is recognized that one of the central aspects of workplace innovation is the active involvement of employees in the innovation process. Hence, we investigate the following research questions: What is the role of employees in the process of designing and implementing workplace innovation and change in Poland? What is the impact of formal and informal organisational structures in this process? The chapter uses a qualitative approach based on in depth interviews and focus groups to answer those questions. We conclude that interaction between the individual (employee) and the structural level (organisation) may result in a gradual destruction of innovation, because innovation processes in Polish companies seem contrary to what workplace innovation WPI) stands for: WPI stresses an engaging role for employees to succeed in innovation, while Polish companies seem to do the opposite.

Research presented in this chapter is part of a project financed in the field of research and development by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education in Poland/National Centre of Research and Development under the III phase of the national programme “Improvement of safety and working conditions” (2014–2016), coordinated by the Central Institute for Labour Protection—National Research Institute.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do Accessed April 12, 2017

  2. 2.

    The coding (FGI 4-BC-cost control specialist-rail transport) indicates the research method (FGI—Focus Group Interview, IDI—In-Depth-Interview, Sh - Shadowing, Mini Case—MC), observation number (e.g. FGI number 4), location (BC—big city, SC—small city), industry (S-services, P production), size of the company (used only for MC—SE as small enterprises: beneath 50 employees and BE: above 50 employees).

References

  • Bendyk, E. (2015). Białe plamy na mapie, czyli o ukrytych potencjałach innowacyjności. In P. Zadura- Lichota (Ed.), Innowacyjna przedsiębiorczość w Polsce. Odryty i ukryty potencjał polskiej przedsiębiorczości (pp. 91–108). Warszawa: Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czapiński, J., & Panek, T. (2015). Diagnoza społeczna 2015. Warunki i jakość życia Polaków. Warszawa: Rada Monitoringu Społecznego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (2007). Shadowing and other techniques for doing fieldwork in modern societies. Malmo: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. (1978). Sociological methods: A source book (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, E. (2004). Privatizing poland. Baby food, big business, and the remaking of labor. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2014). Flash Eurobarometer 398 working conditions report. Retrieved October 8, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_398_en.pdf

  • Gadomska-Lila, K. (2011). Budowanie kultury innowacyjności w świetle badań empirycznych. Współczesne Zarządzanie, 1, 124–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principals in practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M. J., & Cunliffe, A. L. (2006). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, S. J., & Coote, L. V. (2014). Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein’s model. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1609–1621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Högselius, P. (2003, January 16–18). Can East European Countries Innovate? Paper presented at the Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics Winter Conference, Aalborg, Denmark. Retrieved October 16, 2016, from http://www.druid.dk/uploads/tx_picturedb/dw2003-708.pdf

  • Howaldt, J., Oeij, P., Dhondt, S., & Fruytier, B. (2016). Workplace innovation and social innovation: An introduction. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 12(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, L (2007). Central european capitalism in comparative perspective, w: B. Hancké, M. Rhodes, M. Thatcher (Eds.), Beyond varieties of capitalism: Conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the european economy (pp. 307–327). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochanowicz, J., Mandes, M., & Marody, M. (2007). Kulturowe aspekty transformacji ekonomicznej. Warszawa: Instytut Spraw Publicznych.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohtamäki, M., Kekäle, T., & Viitala, R. (2004). Trust and innovation: From spin-off idea to stock exchange. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouvonen, A., Kivimaki, M., Vahtera, J., Oksanen, T., Elovainio, M., Cox, T., et al. (2006). Psychometric evaluation of a short measure of social capital at work. BMC Public Health, 6, 251.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Makó, C., & Illéssy, M. (2015). Innovation policy review. National and European experiences. QuInnE Working Paper 1. Retrieved September 19, 2016 from http://bryder.nu/quinne1/sites/default/files/Working%20Paper%201%20revised%2020160425.pdf

  • Marody, M., & Lewicki, M. (2010). Przemiany ideologii pracy. In M. Marody, & J. Kochanowicz (Eds.), Kultura i gospodarka (pp. 85–125). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mockałło, Z. (2016). Innowacje w miejscu pracy i ich związek z jakością życia zawodowego—kapitałem społecznym, zaangażowaniem w pracę i samopoczuciem pracowników. In M. Strumińska-Kutra, & B. Rok (Eds.), Innowacje w miejscu pracy. Pomiędzy efektywnością a jakością życia zawodowego, Warsaw: Poltext.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. London: The Young Foundation and Nesta. Retrieved September. 19, 2016 from http://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/The-Open-Book-of-Social-Innovationg.pdf

  • Nieć, M. (2015). Działalność innowacyjna przedsiębiorstw w Polsce na tle krajów Europy. In P. Zadura-Lichota (Ed.), Innowacyjna przedsiębiorczość w Polsce. Odryty i ukryty potencjał polskiej przedsiębiorczości (pp. 11–46). Warszawa: Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nölke, A., & Vliegenthart, A. (2009). Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Politics, 61, 670–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2014) Employment database—Employment indicators. Retrieved September, 19, 2016 from http://www.oecd.org/employment/emp/employmentdatabase-employment.htm

  • Oeij, P. R. A., Dhondt, S., Kraan, K., Vergeer, R., & Pot, F. D. (2012). Workplace innovation and its relation with organisational performance and employee commitment. LLINE Lifelong Learning in Europe, 4. Retrieved September 19, 2016 from http://www.elmmagazine.eu/articles/workplace-innovation-and-its-relations-with-organisational-performance-and-employee-commitment/

  • Oeij, P. R. A., Žiauberytė-Jakštienė, R., Dhondt, S., Corral, A., Totterdill, P., & Preenen, P. (2015). Workplace innovation in European companies., Eurofound Study Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1998). Designing institutions in East European transitions. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The theory of institutional design (pp. 199–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieradzka, K. (2014). Barriers to innovation activity of Polish small and medium-sized enterprises. Przedsiębiorstwo i region, 6, 88–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, S (2013). Doing qualitative research, 4th Edition, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocki, R., Prokopowicz, R., & Żmuda, G. (2008). Pełna partycypacja w zarządzaniu. Tajemnica sukcesu największych eksperymentów menedżerskich świata. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Totterdill, P., Pot, F. D., & Dhondt, S. (2016). Defining workplace innovation. In M. Strumińska-Kutra, & B. Rok (Eds.), Innowacje w miejscu pracy. Pomiędzy efektywnością a jakością życia zawodowego, forthcoming. Warsaw: Poltext.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Strumińska-Kutra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Strumińska-Kutra, M., Rok, B., Mockałło, Z. (2017). Workplace Innovation Context in Poland: Between Structure and Agency. In: Oeij, P., Rus, D., Pot, F. (eds) Workplace Innovation. Aligning Perspectives on Health, Safety and Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56333-6_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics