Part of the SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science book series (BRIEFSENVIRONMENTAL)


Soybean (Glycine max (Merr.) L) is not often irrigated (<5% of the land area in the major producing countries), so the crop is vulnerable to variations in rainfall. Even short periods of soil water deficit can adversely affect soybean yields, especially because of the high sensitivity of its symbiotic nitrogen fixation to even minor decreases in soil moisture. Therefore, soil water conservation traits have the potential to result in yield increases. Curiously, little variation has been identified among soybean genotypes for early partial stomatal closure with soil drying. On the other hand, a few genotypes have been identified that express initiation of partial stomatal closure at vapor-pressure deficit as low as 2 kPa. Genotype PI 416937, in particular, has become an important genetic contributor in developing soybean cultivars for dry-land conditions. This genotype has been found to have unique properties in plant hydraulic conductivity and aquaporin expression.


Recombinant Inbred Line Transpiration Rate Soybean Cultivar Soybean Genotype Lower Hydraulic Conductance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bunce JA (1982) Photosynthesis at ambient and elevated humidity over a growing season in soybean. Photosyn Res 3:307–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bunce JA (1984) Identifying soybean lines differing in gas exchange sensitivity to humidity. Ann Appl Biol 105:313–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carpentieri-Pipolo V, Pipolo AE, Abdel-Haleem H, Boerma HR, Sinclair TR (2012) Identification of QTLs associated with limited leaf hydraulic conductance in soybean. Euphytica 186:679–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter TE Jr, Burton JW, Bowman DT, Cui Z, Zhou X, Villagarcia MR, Niewoehner AS, Fountain MO (2003) Registration of ‘N7001’ soybean. Crop Sci 43:1126–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter TE Jr, Burton JW, Fountain MO, Rzewnicki PE, Villagarcia MR, Bowman DT (2007) Registration of ‘N7002’ soybean. J Plant Reg 1:93–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carter TE Jr, Burton JW, Fountain MO, Rzewnicki PE, Villagarcia MR, Bowman DT (2008) Registration of ‘N8001’ soybean. J Plant Reg 2:22–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carter TE Jr, Todd SM, Gillen AM (2016) Registration of ‘USDA-N8002’ soybean cultivar with high yield and abiotic stress resistance traits. J Plant Reg 10:238–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Devi JM, Sinclair TR, Chen P, Carter TE Jr (2014) Evaluation of elite southern maturity soybean breeding lines for drought-tolerant traits. Agron J 106:1947–1954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Devi MJ, Sinclair TR, Taliercio E (2015a) Comparisons of the effects of elevated vapor pressure deficit on gene expression in leaves among two fast-wilting and a slow-wilting soybean. PLoS One 10:e0139134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Devi MJ, Taliercio EW, Sinclair TR (2015b) Leaf expansion of soybean subjected to high and low atmospheric vapour pressure deficits. J Exp Bot 66:1845–1850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Devi MJ, Sinclair TR, Taliercio E (2016) Silver and zinc inhibitors influence transpiration rate and aquaporin transcript abundance in intact soybean plants. Environ Exp Bot 122:168–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fletcher AL, Sinclair TR, Allen LH Jr (2007) Transpiration responses to vapor pressured deficit in well watered ‘slow wilting’ and commercial soybean. Environ Exp Bot 61:145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilbert ME, Holbrook NM, Zwieniecki MA, Sadok W, Sinclair TR (2011) Field confirmation of genetic variation in soybean transpiration response to vapor pressure deficit and photosynthetic compensation. Field Crop Res 124:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heinen RB, Ye Q, Chaumont F (2009) Role of aquaporins in leaf physiology. J Exp Bot 60:2971–2985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hudak CM, Patterson RP (1995) Vegetative growth analysis of a drought-resistant soybean plant introduction. Crop Sci 35:464–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hufstetler EV, Boerma HR, Carter TE Jr, Earl HJ (2007) Genotypic variation for three physiological traits affecting drought tolerance in soybean. Crop Sci 47:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. King CA, Purcell LC, Brye KR (2009) Differential wilting among soybean genotypes in response to water deficit. Crop Sci 49:290–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ray JD, Sinclair TR (1998) The effect of pot size on growth and transpiration of maize and soybean during water deficit stress. J Exp Bot 49:1381–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sadok W, Sinclair TR (2009a) Genetic variability of transpiration response to vapor pressure deficit among soybean cultivars. Crop Sci 49:955–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sadok W, Sinclair TR (2009b) Genetic variability of transpiration response to vapor pressure deficit among soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) genotypes selected from a recombinant inbred line population. Field Crop Res 113:156–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sadok W, Sinclair TR (2010a) Transpiration response of ‘slow-wilting’ and commercial soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) genotypes to three aquaporin inhibitors. J Exp Bot 61:821–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sadok W, Sinclair TR (2010b) Genetic variability of transpiration response of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) shoots to leaf hydraulic conductance inhibitor AgNO3. Crop Sci 50:1423–1430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sadok W, Sinclair TR (2012) Zinc treatment results in transpiration rate decreases that vary among soybean genotypes. J Plant Nutr 35:1866–1877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sadok W, Gilbert ME, Raza AS, Sinclair TR (2012) Basis of slow-wilting phenotype in soybean PI 471938. Crop Sci 52:1261–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Serraj R, Sinclair TR (1997) Variation among soybean cultivars in dinitrogen fixation response to drought. Agron J 89:963–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Serraj R, Sinclair TR (1999) Soybean leaf growth and gas exchange response to drought under carbon dioxide enrichment. Glob Chang Biol 5:283–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seversike TM, Sermons SM, Sinclair TR, Carter TE Jr, Rufty TW (2014) Physiological properties of a drought-resistant wild soybean genotype: transpiration control with soil drying and expression of root morphology. Plant Soil 374:359–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sinclair TR, Ludlow MM (1986) Influence of soil water supply on the plant water balance of four tropical grain legumes. Aust J Plant Phyisol 13:329–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sinclair TR, Hammond LC, Harrison J (1998) Extractable soil water and transpiration rate of soybean on sandy soil. Agron J 90:363–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sinclair TR, Zwieniecki MA, Holbrook NM (2008) Low leaf hydraulic conductance associated with drought tolerance in soybean. Physiol Plant 132:446–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sinclair TR, Messina CD, Beatty A, Samples M (2010) Assessment across the United States of the benefits of altered soybean drought traits. Agron J 102:475–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sinclair TR, Marrou H, Soltani A, Vadez V, Chandolu KC (2014) Soybean production potential in Africa. Glob Food Sec 3:31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sloane RJ, Patterson RP, Carter TE Jr (1990) Field drought tolerance of a soybean plant introduction. Crop Sci 30:118–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Crop and Soil Sciences DepartmentNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations