Advertisement

Dealing with Culture in Schools: A Small-Step Approach Towards Anti-racism in Finland

  • Mélodine SommierEmail author
  • Anssi Roiha
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses anti-racism education by focusing on how culture is used in educational discourses in Finland. More and more studies highlight the pervasive use of culture as a substitute for race, urging scholars to explore how and why cultural claims are made relevant (Breidenbach and Nyíri 2009; Piller 2011). Culture is present in numerous subjects (e.g. religion, literature, history, languages) and anti-racism education should therefore be understood from a holistic perspective. This chapter focuses on the Finnish context which is relevant to examine for two main reasons. First, Finnish school system is globally represented as high quality. Second, the new national curriculum, which reflects current ideas and values, will be applied in August 2016. Drawing on critical approaches to culture, this chapter (1) looks at limitations of the way culture is conceptualized within educational discourses, (2) proposes new ways of using the concept (3) and provides practical examples while considering limitations and challenges such as hidden curriculum and teachers’ personal values. This chapter will primarily deal with foreign language education since one of its main objectives, as stated by the new curriculum, is to “increase cultural diversity and language awareness” [Originally in the text: “Kasvu kulttuuriseen moninaisuuteen ja kielitietoisuuteen” (translation by the authors)] (Opetushallitus 2014, p. 219 & p. 349). Building on intercultural communication and educational research, and using the experience of one of the authors as a teacher, this study bridges the gap between theoretical insights and practical implications. With the aim of providing applicable findings, we argue for a variety of small changes in existing practices rather than the addition of a large anti-racism programme.

Keywords

Anti-racism education Culture Critical intercultural communication Finland 

References

  1. Abdallah-Pretceille, M., & Porcher, L. (2005). Education et communication interculturelle (2nd ed.). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (2nd ed.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Baumann, G. (1996). Contesting culture: Discourses of identity in multi-ethnic London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bhabha, H. K. (2004). The location of culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  6. Bonilla-Silva, E. (2006). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States (2nd ed.). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1994). Rethinking the state: Genesis and structure of the bureaucratic field. Sociological Theory, 12, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breidenbach, J., & Nyíri, P. (2009). Seeing culture everywhere: From genocide to consumer habits. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delanty, G., Wodak, R., & Jones, P. (2008). Identity, belonging and migration. Liverpool: University of Liverpool Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dervin, F. (2010). Assessing intercultural competence in language learning and teaching: A critical review of current efforts. In F. Dervin & E. Suomela-Salmi (Eds.), New approaches to assessment in higher education (pp. 157–173). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  12. Dervin, F. (2011). A plea for change in research on intercultural discourses: A ‘liquid’ approach to the study of the acculturation of Chinese students. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 6(1), 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dovemark, M. (2013). How private ‘everyday racism’ and public ‘racism denial’ contribute to unequal and discriminatory educational experiences. Ethnography and Education, 8(1), 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Essed, P. (1991). Understanding everyday racism: An interdisciplinary theory. Newbury Park, California: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Finnish National Board of Education. (2004). Finnish national core curriculum for basic education. Retrieved from http://www.oph.fi/download/47675_POPS_net_new_2.pdf.
  16. Finnish National Board of Education. (2014). Finnish national core curriculum for basic education. Retrieved from http://www.oph.fi/download/163777_perusopetuksen_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_2014.pdf.
  17. Gillborn, D. (2008). Racism and Education: Coincidence or Conspiracy?. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Graddol, D. (2006). English next. Why global English may mean the end of ‘English as a foreign language’. Plymouth: British Council.Google Scholar
  19. Gulliver, T. (2011). Banal nationalism in ESL textbooks. Canadian Journal of Education, 34(3), 119–135.Google Scholar
  20. Hahl, K., Niemi, P., Johnson Longfor, R., & Dervin, F. (2015). Diversities and interculturality in textbooks: Finland as an example. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Hall, S. (1998). Old and new identities, old and new ethnicities. In A. D. King (Ed.), Culture, globalization and the world-system: Contemporary conditions for the representation of identity (pp. 40–68). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  22. Halualani, R. T. (1998). Seeing through the screen: The struggle of culture. In J. N. Martin, T. K. Nakayama, & L. A. Flores (Eds.), Readings in cultural contexts (pp. 264–275). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  23. Halualani, R. T., Mendoza, S. L., & Drzewiecka, J. A. (2009). “Critical” junctures in intercultural communication studies: A review. The Review of Communication, 9(1), 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holliday, A. (2006). Native-speakerism. ELT Journal, 60(4), 385–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holliday, A. (2009). English as a lingua franca, ‘non-native speakers’ and cosmopolitan realities. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), English as an international language: Perspectives and pedagogical issues (pp. 21–33). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters Bristol.Google Scholar
  26. Holliday, A. (2011). Intercultural communication and ideology. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Holm, G., & Londen, M. (2010). The discourse on multicultural education in Finland: Education for whom? Intercultural Education, 21(2), 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Huntington, S. P. (1996). The Clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  29. Jameson, F. (1998). The cultural turn: Selected writings on the postmodern, 1983–1998. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  30. Jokisalo, J., Kukkonen, J., & Simola, R. (2009). Opettajaksi opiskelevien käsityksiä monikulttuurisuudesta. In J. Jokisalo, & R. Simola (Eds.), Monikulttuurisuus luokanopettajakoulutuksessa–monialaisten opintojen läpäisevä juonne (7th ed.), (pp. 197–211). University of Joensuu Bulletins of the Faculty of Education.Google Scholar
  31. Kachru, B. B. (2006). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle (reprint of Kachru 1985). In K. Bolton & B. B. Kachru (Eds.), World Englishes: Critical concepts in linguistics (Vol. 3, pp. 241–269). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Kopperoinen, A. (2011). Accents of English as a lingua franca: A study of Finnish textbooks. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Korkiasaari, J., & Söderling, I. (2003). Finnish emigration and immigration after World War II. Siirtolaisuusinstituutti [Institute of Migration]. Retrieved from http://www.migrationinstitute.fi/files/pdf/artikkelit/finnish_emigration_and_immigration_after_world_war_ii.pdf.
  34. Kramsch, C. (1997). The privilege of the non-native speaker. PMLA, 3, 359–369.Google Scholar
  35. Kundnani, A. (2004). The rise and fall of British multiculturalism. In G. Titley (Ed.), Resituating culture (pp. 105–113). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  36. Lentin, A. (2004). The problem of culture and human rights in the response to racism. In G. Titley (Ed.), Resituating culture (pp. 95–104). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  37. Martin, J. N., & Nakayama, T. K. (2015). Reconsidering intercultural (communication) competence in the workplace: A dialectical approach. Language and Intercultural Communication, 15(1), 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mendoza, S. L., Halualani, R. T., & Drzewiecka, J. A. (2002). Moving the discourse on identities in intercultural communication: Structure, culture, and resignifications. Communication Quarterly, 50(3–4), 312–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ministry of Interior. (2012). Annual report on immigration [maahanmuuton vuosikatsaus]. Retrieved from http://www.intermin.fi/download/46515_Maahanmuuton_tilastokatsaus_2012_ENG_web.pdf?4506817ae79ad188.
  40. Ngũgĩ, W. T. (1993). Moving the centre: The struggle for cultural freedoms. Oxford, UK: James Currey.Google Scholar
  41. OECD. (2000). Literacy skills for the world of tomorrow. Further results from PISA 2000. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/2960581.pdf.
  42. OECD. (2003). First results from PISA 2003. Executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/34002454.pdf.
  43. OECD. (2006). PISA 2006 results. Executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/39725224.pdf.
  44. OECD. (2009). PISA 2009 results. Executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46619703.pdf.
  45. Pennycook, A. (2007). Global Englishes and transcultural flows. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Piller, I. (2011). Intercultural communication: A critical introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Piller, I. (2012). Intercultural communication: An overview. In C. B. Paulston, S. F. Kiesling, & E. S. Rangel (Eds.), The handbook of intercultural discourse and communication (pp. 3–18). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pitkänen, P., & Kouki, S. (2002). Meeting foreign cultures: A survey of the attitudes of Finnish authorities towards immigrants and immigration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28(1), 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pyke, K., & Dang, T. (2003). “FOB” and “whitewashed”: Identity and internalized racism among second generation Asian Americans. Qualitative Sociology, 26(2), 147–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons. What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  51. Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  52. Sleeter, C. E., & Bernal, D. D. (2004). Critical pedagogy, critical race theory, and antiracist education. In J. A. Banks, & C. A. McGee Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research in multicultural education (pp. 240–258). San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  53. Sommier, M. (2014). The concept of culture in media studies: A critical review of academic literature. InMedia. The French Journal of Media and Media Representations in the English-Speaking World, (5).Google Scholar
  54. Spitzberg, B. H., & Changnon, G. (2009). Conceptualizing intercultural competence. In D. K. Deardorff (Ed.), The sage handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 2–64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. Statstics Finland. (2016). Population. Retrieved from: http://www.stat.fi/tup/suoluk/suoluk_vaesto_en.html.
  56. Taguieff, P. A. (1989). Réflexions sur la question antiraciste. [Reflexions on the antiracist question] Mots, 18, 75–93.Google Scholar
  57. Titley, G. (2004). Resituating culture: An introduction. In G. Titley (Ed.), Resituating culture (pp. 9–20). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  58. Ware, L. (2015). Color-blind racism in France: Bias against ethnic minority immigrants. Wash UJL & Pol’y, 46, 185–244.Google Scholar
  59. Wren, K. (2001). Cultural racism: Something rotten in the state of Denmark? Social and Cultural Geography, 2(2), 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Xu, K. (2013). Theorizing difference in intercultural communication: A critical dialogic perspective. Communication Monographs, 80(3), 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.University of Jyväskylä, Finland & City of Jyväskylä, Education ServicesJyväskylaFinland

Personalised recommendations