Skip to main content

Recent Research on Science Communication and Engagement in Informal Settings in South Africa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter provides an analysis of recent research which has been conducted in South Africa in the fields of science communication and science engagement in informal settings. The majority of science communication research has been made available via meetings such as the Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCST) and the African Science Communication Conference (ASCC). Presentations at PCST have been varied, from Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) and outreach to health and social media, while the majority of presentations at the two ASCC conferences focused on science journalism, “show and tell” and policy issues. The relatively few published articles with the field of science communication indicate that there is considerable scope for an expanded research agenda. The field of science engagement research has tended to rely on the interests of a few individuals. Despite this, it has confirmed that many of the findings of similar research in developed countries hold true in South Africa, for example, that learning is incremental, and affective outcomes are as important as cognitive ones. Research studies on science fairs show impressive agency and initiative by the student participants, but resource constraints are hampering greater engagement with such informal learning opportunities. In summary, while informal sites are making strides in science communication and engagement, there are historical inequities in terms of space and culture which need to be addressed to ensure greater participation by the majority of the population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    www.sahistory.org.za.

  2. 2.

    e.g., http://www.scidev.net/en/science-communication/features/drinking-up-science-in-african-caf-s-1.html; http://www.scidev.net/en/news/ghana-launches-first-caf-scientifique-in-west-afr.html.

  3. 3.

    Townships were initiated under South Africa’s Group Areas Act during apartheid, which demarcated residential areas for different race groups (black, Indian, colored, etc.) Even today, many people in townships belong to a low income group, and there is a high rate of unemployment.

References

  • Agrawal, A. (1995). Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change, 26(3), 413–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G., & Jegede, O. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alant, B. (2010). ‘We cross night’: Some reflections on the role of the Eskom expo for young scientists as a means of accommodating disadvantaged learners into the field of science and technology. Perspectives in Education, 28(4), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., Lucas, K., & Ginns, I. (2003). Theoretical perspectives on learning in an informal setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 177–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A., & Feder, M. (Eds.). (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (2012). Exploring learning through energy dialogues in an informal learning centre (MSc Research Report). Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • du Plessis, H. (2011). Science and society: Public Understanding of Science (PUS) in South Africa and other collaborations. Paper presented at the Human Sciences Research Council Seminar series. Retrieved from http://www.hsrc.ac.za/Document-3944.phtml

  • Falk, J. H. (2003). Personal meaning mapping. In G. Caban, C. Scott, J. H. Falk, & L. D. Dierking (Eds.), Museums and creativity: A study into the role of museums in design education (pp. 10–18). Sydney: Powerhouse Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H. (Ed.). (2001). Free-choice science education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, D., Allie, S., Pelaez, N., & Anderson, T. (2016). A cross-cultural comparison of high school students’ responses to a science Centre show on the physics of sound in South Africa. Public Understanding of Science. doi:10.1177/0963662516642725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gastrow, M. (2010). The public understanding of biotechnology in the media. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, J., & Miller, S. (1998). Science in public: Communication, culture and credibility. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jegede, O., & Kyle, W. (2007). Concerns and issues in scientific literacy in the post-modern era. Paper presented at the NARST Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joubert, L. (2001). Priorities and challenges for science communication in South Africa. Science Communication, 22(3), 316–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laugksch, R. C., & Spargo, P. E. (1996a). Construction of a paper-and-pencil test of basic scientific literacy based on selected literacy goals recommended by the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Public Understanding of Science, 5(4), 331–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laugksch, R. C., & Spargo, P. E. (1996b). Development of a pool of scientific literacy test-items based on selected AAAS literacy goals. Science Education, 80(2), 121–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lelliott, A. D. (2007). Learning about astronomy: a case study exploring how grade 7 and 8 students experience sites of informal learning in South Africa. PhD thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. Retrieved from http://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/handle/10539/4480

  • Lelliott, A. D. (2010). The concept of spatial scale in astronomy addressed by an informal learning environment. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(3), 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lelliott, A. D. (2014). Understanding gravity: The role of a school visit to a science Centre. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 4(4), 305–322. doi:10.1080/21548455.2013.818260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lelliott, A. (2016). Visitors’ views of human origins after visiting the cradle of humankind world heritage site. South African Journal of Science, 112(1/2), 8. doi:10.17159/sajs.2016/20150210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lelliott, A. D., & Pendlebury, S. (2009). “A large object with a small museum”: A narrative analysis of Tlotlo’s experience of an astronomy science center. Curator, 52(3), 241–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lelliott, A. D., Plantan, T., & Gaines, M. (2012). From South Florida to South Africa: A collaborative approach for making science sensible to learners in informal and formal settings. International Journal of Education, 4(4), 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maarschalk, J. (1988). Scientific literacy and informal science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(2), 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, J. (2014). Snakes are scary—Or are they? International Zoo Educators Journal, 50, 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann-Lang, J., Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2016). Does more education mean less fun? A comparison of two animal presentations. International Zoo Yearbook, 50, 155–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokgobanama, D. (2011). Learning about evolution: The influence of an educational visit and intervention on teachers’ knowledge and attitudes (MSc Research Report). Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molahloe, M. (2011). The impact of a visit to Lesotho Water and Sewage Authority (WASA) on learners’ knowledge about community health (MSc Research Report). Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molatudi, M., & Pouris, A. (2006). Assessing the knowledge base for biotechnology in South Africa. Scientometrics, 68(1), 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosabala, M., and Lelliott, A. D. (2012). Investigating perceptions of teachers and their learners about museums visits. Paper presented at the 20th Annual Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education Conference, Lilongwe, Malawi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwale, P. N. (2006). Societal deliberation on genetically modified maize in southern Africa: The debateness and publicness of the Zambian national consultation on genetically modified maize food aid in 2002. Public Understanding of Science, 15(1), 89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwale, P. N. (2012). Questioning genetically modified maize: a case of public debate in the Southern African media (1997–2007). Unpublished PhD, University of the Witwatersrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndlovu, M. (2014). Investigating some background factors affecting student participation in science fairs: A case study of a regional expo for young scientists. ICERI2014 Proceedings (pp. 2381–2388).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngcoza, K. M., Sewry, J., Chikunda, C., & Kahenge, W. (2016). Stakeholders’ perceptions of participation in science expos: A south African case study. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2), 189–199. doi:10.1080/18117295.2016.1192238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyamupangedengu, E. (2010). Worksheets and learning in South African museums (MSc Research Report), Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand. Retrieved from http://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/handle/10539/8542

  • Nyamupangedengu, E., & Lelliott, A. D. (2012). An exploration of learners’ use of worksheets during a science museum visit. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(1), 82–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogunniyi, M. B., & Ogawa, M. (2008). The prospects and challenges of training south African and Japanese educators to enact an indigenised science curriculum. South African Journal of Higher Education, 22(1), 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouris, A. (1991). Understanding and appreciation of science by the public in South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 87(8), 358–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouris, A. (2001). Interests, Public attitudes and Sources of Scientific Information in South Africa. Paper presented at the 6th International Meeting on Public Communication of Science and Technology, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramnarain, U., & Beer, J. (2013). Science students creating hybrid spaces when engaging in an expo investigation project. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 99–116. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9246-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapule, S. (2007). Assessing the impact science centres have on the holistic development of science learners. PhD thesis, North-West University, Potchefstroom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, V., Buhlungu, S., Daniel, J., Southall, R., & Lutchman, J. (2006). The state of mathematics and science education: Schools are not equal. In S. Buhlungu, J. Daniel, R. Southall, & J. Lutchman (Eds.), State of the nation: South Africa 2005–2006 (pp. 392–416). Pretoria: HSRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. (2007). Rethinking evolution in the museum: Envisioning African origins. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocklmayer, S. M., & Bryant, C. (2011). Science and the public—What should people know? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2(1), 81–101. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.543186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. (2011). ‘They are using laptops, we are using boxes’: Township learners' conceptions of expo. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(1), 67–79. doi:10.1080/10288457.2011.10740702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trench, B. (2008). Towards an analytical framework of science communication models. In D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele, & S. Shi (Eds.), Communicating science in social contexts (pp. 119–135). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venter, E. (2014). A comparative evaluation of educational programmes at zoological institutions in three countries. Pretoria: University of South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, B. (1991). Knowledges in context. Science, Technology & Human Values, 16(1), 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony Lelliott .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lelliott, A. (2017). Recent Research on Science Communication and Engagement in Informal Settings in South Africa. In: Leggon, C., Gaines, M. (eds) STEM and Social Justice: Teaching and Learning in Diverse Settings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56297-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56297-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56296-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56297-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics