Skip to main content

Weighted Guttman Errors: Handling Ties and Two-Level Data

  • Conference paper
Quantitative Psychology (IMPS 2016)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 196))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We provide an introduction to weighted Guttman errors and discuss two problems in computing weighted Guttman errors that are currently not handled correctly by all software: Handling ties—that is, computing weighted Guttman errors when two items have the same estimated popularity—and computing weighted Guttman errors when the data have a two-level structure. Handling ties can be incorporated easily in existing software. For computing weighted Guttman errors for two-level data, we provide an R function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • D.R. Crisan, J.E. Van de Pol, L.A. Van der Ark, Scalability coefficients for two-level polytomous item scores: an introduction and an application, in Quantitative Psychology Research: The 80th Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Beijing, China, 2015, ed. by L.A. van der Ark, D.M. Bolt, W.-C. Wang, J.A. Douglas, M. Wiberg (Springer, New York, 2016), pp. 139–153. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-38759-8_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • L. Guttman, The basis for scalogram analysis, in Measurement and Prediction, ed. by S.A. Stouffer, L. Guttman, E.A. Suchman, P.F. Lazarsfeld, S.A. Star, J.A. Clausen (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1950), pp. 60–90

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Karabatsos, Comparing the aberrant response detection performance of thirty-six person-fit statistics. Appl. Meas. Educ. 16, 277–298 (2003). doi:10.1207/S15324818AME1604_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Koopman, Standard errors of scalability coefficients in two-level Mokken scale analysis. Unpublished master’s thesis, Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Kuijpers, L.A. Van der Ark, M.A. Croon, Standard errors and confidence intervals for scalability coefficients in Mokken scale analysis using marginal models. Sociol. Methodol. 43, 42–69 (2013). doi:10.1177/0081175013481958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Kuijpers, L.A. Van der Ark, M.A. Croon, K. Sijtsma, Bias in estimates and standard errors of Mokken's scalability coefficients. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 40, 331–345 (2016). doi:10.1177/0146621616638500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.R. Meijer, The number of Guttman errors as a simple and powerful person-fit statistic. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 18, 311–314 (1994). doi:10.1177/014662169401800402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.J. Mokken, A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis: With Applications in Political Research (De Gruyter, Berlin, 1971)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • I.W. Molenaar, Item Steps. Heymans Bulletin HB-83-630-EX (University of Groningen, Groningen, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • I.W. Molenaar, A weighted Loevinger H-coefficient extending Mokken scaling to multicategory items. Kwantitatieve Methoden 12(37), 97–117 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • I.W. Molenaar, Nonparametric models for polytomous responses, in Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory, ed. by W.J. van der Linden, R.K. Hambleton (Springer, New York, 1997), pp. 369–380. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • I.W. Molenaar, K. Sijtsma, User’s Manual MSP5 for Windows (iec ProGAMMA, Groningen, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Sijtsma, I.W. Molenaar, Introduction to Nonparametric Item Response Theory (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • K. Sijtsma, L.A. Van der Ark, A tutorial on how to do a Mokken scale analysis on your test and questionnaire data. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 70(1), 137–158 (2017). doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T.A.B. Snijders, Two-level nonparametric scaling for dichotomous data, in Essays on Item Response Theory, ed. by A. Boomsma, M.A.J. van Duijn, T.A.B. Snijders (Springer, New York, 2001a), (pp. 319–338). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0169-1_17

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • T.A.B. Snijders, TWOMOK [computer software]. Retrieved from https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~snijders/ (2001b)

  • L.A. Van der Ark, New developments in Mokken scale analysis in R. J. Stat. Softw. 48(5), 1–27 (2012). doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.P. Zijlstra, L.A. Van der Ark, K. Sijtsma, Outlier detection in test and questionnaire data. Multivar. Behav. Res. 42, 531–555 (2007). doi: 10.1080/00273170701384340

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Letty Koopman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Koopman, L., Zijlstra, B.J.H., van der Ark, L.A. (2017). Weighted Guttman Errors: Handling Ties and Two-Level Data. In: van der Ark, L.A., Wiberg, M., Culpepper, S.A., Douglas, J.A., Wang, WC. (eds) Quantitative Psychology. IMPS 2016. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 196. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56294-0_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics