Skip to main content

People-to-People (P2P) Interventions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Building Peace Through Knowledge
  • 321 Accesses

Abstract

Intergroup conflict takes different shapes in different contexts. In this chapter, we will review both theory and practice on reducing such conflict, taking into account the main directions in this field. Specifically, we will cover people-to-people interventions (P2Ps), the contact hypothesis (and critiques of it), dialogue research, intergroup communication, and peace education. Region-specific communication codes (musayra and dugri), interactive problem solving, interactive conflict resolution, and civil society efforts will be presented. Moreover, TRT (To Reflect and Trust) programs will be reviewed, and relevant Identity Drawing Map (IDM) research will be discussed.

When will they/we ever learn? Humans continue to roil in the cauldron of harm and violence, yet search for the haven of security, esteem, and peace.

—Massey & Abu-Baker.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albeck, J. H., Adwan, S., & Bar-On, D. (2002). Dialogue groups: TRT’s guidelines for working through intractable conflicts by personal storytelling. Journal of Peace Psychology, 8(4), 301–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbitt, E. F., & Steiner, P., et al. (2009). Combining empathy with problem-solving: The tamra model of facilitation in israel. In Craig Zelizer and Robert Rubenstein (Eds.), Building peace: Practical lessons from the field. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biton, I., & Salomon, G. (2005). Peace in the eyes of Israeli and Palestinian Youths: Effects of collective narratives and peace education programs. Journal of Peace Research, 43, 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1958). I and thou. (trans: Gregory Smith, R.). Edinburgh: T & T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. (1969). Conflict and communication. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaitin, J. (2008). Bridging the impossible? Confronting barriers to dialogue between Israelis and Germans and Israelis and Palestinians. International Journal of Peace Studies, 13(2), 33–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, D. J., & Louis, W. R. (2012). Peace interventions tailored to phases within a cycle of intergroup violence. In L. Tropp (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict (pp. 252–272). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1996). Toward a new vision: Race, class and gender as categories of analysis and connection. In K. Rosenblum & T. Travis (Eds.), The meaning of difference: American constructions of race, sex and gender, social class and sexual orientation (pp. 213–223). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Estree, T. P. (2012). Addressing intractable conflict through interactive problem-solving. In L. Tropp (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict (pp. 229–251). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doubilet, K. (2007). Coming together: Theory and practice of intergroup encounters for Palestinians, Arab Israelis, and Jewish-Israelis. In Judy Kuriansky (Ed.), Beyond bullets and bombs (pp. 49–58). CT: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feghali, E. (1997). Arab cultural communication patterns. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 21, 345–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. J. (Ed.). (2005). Paving the way: Contributions of interactive conflict resolution to peacemaking. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fountain, S. (1999). Peace education in UNICEF. Working Paper Series, Programme Division, Education Section. New York: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1973). Martin Buber: The life of dialogue. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenna, M. (2012).Why peacebuilding failed in Israel and Palestine. A critical analysis of civil society peacebuilding. American University. Available online, last accessed 03.05.15: http://www.academia.edu/2455500/Why_Peacebuilding_Failed_in_Israel_and_Palestine_-_A_Critical_Analysis_of_Civil_Society_Peacebuilding

  • Gergen, K. (1999a, May 27–31). Moral disgust and the challenge of discursive accord. In Lecture Presented at the 49th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. (1999b, May 27–31). Toward transformative dialogue. In Paper Presented to the 49th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golan, D., & Shalhoub-Kevorkian, N. (2014). Community-engaged courses in a conflict zone: A case study of the Israeli academic corpus. Journal of Peace Education, 11(2), 181–207. doi:10.1080/17400201.2014.898624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. (2002). CONTACT: Training a new generation of peacebuilders. Peace and Change, 27(1), 97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. (2010). Reconciliation and forgiveness in divided societies: A path of courage, compassion, and commitment. In R. F. Paloutzian & A. Kalayjian (Eds.), Forgiveness and reconciliation (pp. 251–266). Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handelman, S. (2011). The Bangladesh approach to the Palestinian-Israeli struggle. International Journal of Conflict Management, 22(1), 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handelman, S. (2012). Between the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the East-West Pakistan struggle: A challenge to the conventional wisdom. Israel Affairs, 18(1), 12–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendler, M. (2012). Music for peace in Jerusalem. Unpublished senior essay in International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., Farah, A., & Zelniker, T. (2013). Expression of symbols and their message of peace and conflict in identity drawing map (IDM): Arab and Jewish students. Creative Education, 4, 7A2, 137–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, A. S. (1997). Face to face at arm’s length: Conflict norms and extra-group relations in grassroots dialogue groups. Human Organizations, 56, 265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inbar, E. (2006). Israel’s Palestinian challenge. Israel Affairs, 12(4), 823–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katriel, T. (1986). Talking straight: Dugri speech in Israeli sabra culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. (1972). The problem-solving workshop in conflict resolution.  In R. L. Merritt (Ed.), Communication in international politics (pp. 168–204). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. (2005). Interactive problem solving in the Israeli-Palestinian case: Past contributions and present challenges. In R. Fisher (Ed.), Paving the way: Contributions of interactive conflict resolution to peacemaking (pp. 41–63).  Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. (2007). The Israeli-Palestinian peace process and its vicissitudes. American Psychologist, 62(4), 287–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. (2008). Evaluating the contributions of interactive problem solving to the resolution of ethnonational conflicts. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 14(1), 29–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klieman, A. (1988). Statecraft in the dark. Jerusalem: Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maoz, I. (2000). An experiment in peace: Reconciliation-aimed workshops of Jewish-Israeli and Palestinian youth. Journal of Peace Research, 37(6), 721–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maoz, I. (2004). Coexistence is in the eye of the beholder: Evaluating intergroup encounter interventions between Jews and Arabs in Israel. Journal of Social Issues, 6(2), 437–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maoz, I. (2008). ‘They saw a terrorist’—Responses of Jewish-Israeli viewers to an interview with a Palestinian terrorist. Peace and Conflict, 14, 275–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maoz, I., & Ellis, D. G. (2001). Going to ground: Argument in Israeli-Jewish and Palestinian encounter groups. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34(4), 399–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maoz, I., Ward, A., Katz, M., & Ross, L. (2002). Reactive devaluation of an Israeli and a palestinian peace proposal. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(4), 515–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C. R. (1997). Intractable conflicts: Keys to treatment. Gernika Gogoratuz working paper n. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagda, B. R. A. (2006). Breaking barriers, crossing borders, building bridges: Communication processes in intergroup dialogues. Journal of Social Issues, 62(3), 553–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philipsen, G., & Albrecht, T. L. (Eds.). (1997). Developing Communication Theories: SUNY Series in Human Communication Processes. State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Y., & Perkins, D. (2013). Shallow roots require constant watering: The challenge of sustained impact in educational programs. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(4), 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, J. (1997). Resolving identity-based conflicts in nations, organizations, and communities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saguy, T., Tausch, N., Dovidio, J. F., & Pratto, F. (2009). The irony of harmony. Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. The Association for Psychological Science, 20(1), 114–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (2004). Does peace education make a difference in the context of an intractable conflict? Peace and Conflict, 10(3), 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (2006). Does peace education really make a difference? Peace and Conflict, 12(1), 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (2010). Four major challenges facing peace education in regions of intractable conflict. Center for Research on Peace Education. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (2011). Four major challenges facing peace education in regions of intractable conflict. Peace and Conflict, 17(1), 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. (2012). Principled negotiation. In D. J. Christie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Peace Psychology, (pp. 703–709). Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shnabel, N., & Nadler, A. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 116–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spurk, C. (2010). Understanding civil society. In T. Paffenholz (Ed.), Civil society & peacebuilding: A critical assessment (p. 20). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staub, E. (2005). Constructive rather than harmful forgiveness, reconciliation, and ways to promote them after genocide and mass killing. In E. L. Worthington Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 443–460). New York: Hove, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas Jr., R. R. (1990). From affirmative action to affirming diversity. Harvard Business Review, March–April, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Time Watch, BBC. (1993). Children of the Third Reich. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutu, D. (1999). No future without forgiveness. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ury, W. (2000). The third side. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, U., & Hewstone, M. (2012). Intergroup contact. In L.Tropp (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Intergroup Conflict (pp. 193–209). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  •  Wanis-St. John, A. (2006). Back-channel negotiation: International bargaining in the shadows. Negotiation Journal, 22(2), 119–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanis-St. John, A., & Kew, D. (2008). Civil society and peace negotiations: Confronting exclusion. International Negotiation, 13, 11–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeakley, A. (1998). The nature of prejudice change: Positive and negative change processes arising from intergroup contact experiences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Al-Krenawi, A. (2017). People-to-People (P2P) Interventions. In: Building Peace Through Knowledge. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56279-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56279-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56278-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56279-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics