Abstract
Hospitals have come a long way since the days of the failings of the Bristol Royal Infirmary, when the inquiry reported that there was a “substantial excess of deaths of between 30 and 35 babies under one year old, between 1991 and 1995” ([1], p. 241). At this time the inquiry reported that there were problems with a system of healthcare rather than with any particular individual. It was reported that the surgeons were working in silos, that there were no agreed standards and little opportunity to benchmark data. However at this time there did not appear to be any agreed standards by which to measure and assess outcomes “… no clear national standards of care emerged against which clinicians could confidently expect to compare their performance … and so it is unlikely that any clinician would expect to do so” ([1], p. 234).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kennedy I. The report of the public inquiry into children’s heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984–1995 – Learning from Bristol Department of Health, UK; 2001.
Baker GR. The roles of leaders in high performing health care systems. London: The Kings Fund; 2011. www.kingsfund.org.uk.
Freeman T. Using performance indicators to improve health care quality in the public sector: a review of the literature. Health Serv Manage Res. 2002;15(2):12–37.
Marshall MN, Davies HTO. Performance measurement and management of healthcare professionals – some topical issues. Dis Manag Health Out. 2000;7(6):305–14.
Ettorchi-Tardy A, Levif M, Michel P. Benchmarking: a method for calculating quality improvement in health. Healthcare Policy. 2012;7(4):e101–19.
Jacobson GH, Streiff N, McCoin R, Lescallette SR, Slovis CM. Kaizen: a method of process improvement in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(12):1341–9. Accessed on line at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00580.x/full.
Graban M, Swartz JE. Health care Kaizen. Engaging front-line staff in sustainable continuous improvements. Accessed online at https://books.google.com.sa/books?isbn=1439872961. 2012.
Omachonu VK, Einspruch NG. Innovation in healthcare delivery systems: a conceptual framework. Public Sec Innov J. 2010;15(1.) Article 2. Accessed online at http://www.innovation.cc/scholarly-style/omachonu_healthcare_3innovate2.pdf.
Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691–729.
Reader TW, Gillespie A, Roberts J. Patient complaints in helthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy (May 29) BMJ Quality and Safety. 2014.
Øvretveit J. Health service quality. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Press; 1992.
Information Centre. Measuring for quality improvement: the approach accessed online at http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Letters|andcirculars/Dearcolleagueletters/DH_090444. 2009.
Benn J, Arnold G, Wei I, Riley C, Aleva F. Using quality indicators in anaesthesia: feeding back data to improve care. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(1):80–91.
Øvretveit J. The Norwegian approach to integrated quality development. J Manag Med. 2001;15(2):125–41.
Haller G, Stoelwinder J, Myles PS, McNeil J. Quality and safety indicators in anesthesia: a systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:1158–75.
Bahtsevani C, Uden G, Willman A. Outcomes of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20:427–33.
Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993;342:1317–22.
Macario A. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:652.
Varughese, et al. Quality of pediatric anesthesia. Pediatr Anesth. 2010;20:684–96.
Deming WE. Out of the crisis. MIT Press; 1986.
NICE. CG65 Perioperative hypothermia (inadvertent). Accessed online at: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG65/NICEGuidance/pdf/English. 2008.
De Vos M, Graafmans W, Kooistra M, Meijboom B, Van Der Voort P, Westert G. Using quality indicators to improve hospital care: a review of the literature. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009;21:119–29.
Benn J, Arnold G, D’Lima D, Wei I, Moore J, Aleva F. Evaluation of a continuous monitoring and feedback initiative to improve quality of anaesthetic care: a mixed-methods quasi-experimental study. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2015;3(32.) National Institute for Health Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wrazen, R., Soliman, S. (2017). Effective Hospital Leadership: Quality Performance Evaluation. In: Godbole, P., Burke, D., Aylott, J. (eds) Why Hospitals Fail. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56224-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56224-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56223-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56224-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)