Skip to main content

Effective Hospital Leadership: Quality Performance Evaluation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Why Hospitals Fail

Abstract

Hospitals have come a long way since the days of the failings of the Bristol Royal Infirmary, when the inquiry reported that there was a “substantial excess of deaths of between 30 and 35 babies under one year old, between 1991 and 1995” ([1], p. 241). At this time the inquiry reported that there were problems with a system of healthcare rather than with any particular individual. It was reported that the surgeons were working in silos, that there were no agreed standards and little opportunity to benchmark data. However at this time there did not appear to be any agreed standards by which to measure and assess outcomes “… no clear national standards of care emerged against which clinicians could confidently expect to compare their performance … and so it is unlikely that any clinician would expect to do so” ([1], p. 234).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kennedy I. The report of the public inquiry into children’s heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984–1995 – Learning from Bristol Department of Health, UK; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker GR. The roles of leaders in high performing health care systems. London: The Kings Fund; 2011. www.kingsfund.org.uk.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Freeman T. Using performance indicators to improve health care quality in the public sector: a review of the literature. Health Serv Manage Res. 2002;15(2):12–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Marshall MN, Davies HTO. Performance measurement and management of healthcare professionals – some topical issues. Dis Manag Health Out. 2000;7(6):305–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ettorchi-Tardy A, Levif M, Michel P. Benchmarking: a method for calculating quality improvement in health. Healthcare Policy. 2012;7(4):e101–19.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacobson GH, Streiff N, McCoin R, Lescallette SR, Slovis CM. Kaizen: a method of process improvement in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(12):1341–9. Accessed on line at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00580.x/full.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Graban M, Swartz JE. Health care Kaizen. Engaging front-line staff in sustainable continuous improvements. Accessed online at https://books.google.com.sa/books?isbn=1439872961. 2012.

  8. Omachonu VK, Einspruch NG. Innovation in healthcare delivery systems: a conceptual framework. Public Sec Innov J. 2010;15(1.) Article 2. Accessed online at http://www.innovation.cc/scholarly-style/omachonu_healthcare_3innovate2.pdf.

  9. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691–729.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Reader TW, Gillespie A, Roberts J. Patient complaints in helthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy (May 29) BMJ Quality and Safety. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Øvretveit J. Health service quality. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Information Centre. Measuring for quality improvement: the approach accessed online at http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Letters|andcirculars/Dearcolleagueletters/DH_090444. 2009.

  13. Benn J, Arnold G, Wei I, Riley C, Aleva F. Using quality indicators in anaesthesia: feeding back data to improve care. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(1):80–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Øvretveit J. The Norwegian approach to integrated quality development. J Manag Med. 2001;15(2):125–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Haller G, Stoelwinder J, Myles PS, McNeil J. Quality and safety indicators in anesthesia: a systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:1158–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bahtsevani C, Uden G, Willman A. Outcomes of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20:427–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993;342:1317–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Macario A. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:652.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Varughese, et al. Quality of pediatric anesthesia. Pediatr Anesth. 2010;20:684–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Deming WE. Out of the crisis. MIT Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  21. NICE. CG65 Perioperative hypothermia (inadvertent). Accessed online at: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG65/NICEGuidance/pdf/English. 2008.

  22. De Vos M, Graafmans W, Kooistra M, Meijboom B, Van Der Voort P, Westert G. Using quality indicators to improve hospital care: a review of the literature. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009;21:119–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Benn J, Arnold G, D’Lima D, Wei I, Moore J, Aleva F. Evaluation of a continuous monitoring and feedback initiative to improve quality of anaesthetic care: a mixed-methods quasi-experimental study. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2015;3(32.) National Institute for Health Research.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Remigiusz Wrazen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wrazen, R., Soliman, S. (2017). Effective Hospital Leadership: Quality Performance Evaluation. In: Godbole, P., Burke, D., Aylott, J. (eds) Why Hospitals Fail. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56224-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56224-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56223-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56224-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics