Abstract
Since the independence movement in India, beginning in the latter half of the nineteenth century, the country’s political history has been closely linked with media, as this played an active role in mobilizing and unifying the masses against the British. Independent India believed in a democracy and subsequently held elections every five years to elect its quasi-federal government. Today, there are several active, dominant players at the regional or provincial level. That media and politics interlink is shown by the fact that every political party either owns or operates a television channel to propagate its ideology or eulogize its party leaders. Even those belonging to businesses have strong allegiances to a political party. With more than 800 channels operating in India, television has a far reach compared to any other medium of communication. This chapter focuses on the effectiveness of 24-hour news television channels to sway a majority of the electorate and create larger-than-life images of politicians, overpowering reality. Though charges of corruption and nepotism exist, politicians make innovative use of news channels and cultivate a specific picture, having the luxury of time and space on the channels to which they have access, and going on to win elections. This chapter explores the phenomenon of media influence in the context of India with case studies of national and regional/state leaders who utilized television to obfuscate their shortcomings and provide a theatrical experience to win over the electorate.
Nagamallika Gudipaty’s current research is in political communication and journalism studies. In this chapter, she discusses how media framing affects the audience’s perceptions and attitudes about politicians and political parties.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cappella, J., and K. Jamieson. 1996. News Frames, Political Cynicism, and Media Cynicism. The Media and Politics. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546: 71–84. Sage Publications in association with the American Academy of Political and Social Science. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1048171.
Cappella, J., and K. Jamieson. 1997. Spiral of cynicism. The press and public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
Davie, G. 2010. Mass Communication theory: From theory to practical application http://masscommtheory.com/. Accessed 22 Nov 2015.
Donthi, Praveen.The Takeover. The Caravan: A Journal of politics and culture. May 1, 2012. http://www.caravanmagazine.in/reportage/takeover-0/2#sthash.Z15GAdPl.dpuf. Accessed 22 Dec 2015.
Entman, R. 1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58.
Fairhurst, G., and Sarr R. 1996. The Art of Framing. Managing the language of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fischer, G. W., and Johnson E. J. 1986. Behavioral decision theory and political decision making. In Political Cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie symposium on cognition, ed. Richard R Lau and David O. Sears, 55–65. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gamson, W. A., and Modigliani, A. 1987. The changing culture of affirmative action. In Research in political sociology ed. R. G. Braungart and M. M. Braungart. 3: 137–177. Greenwich CT: JAI Press.
Gamson, W. A., and A. Modigliani. 1989. Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology 95: 1–37.
Ghatak, Aditi Roy, and Thakurtha. 2012. Politics and media control. www.thehoot.org. June 30. http://www.thehoot.org/media-watch/media-business/politics-and-media-control-6046. Accessed Sept 2012
Gitlin, T. 1980. The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new Left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper and Row.
Heider, F. 1944. Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review 51 (6): 358–374.
India Today. 2004. Elections special. India Today Group 9 (24): 33–170.
Iyengar, S. 1991. Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jaffri, Syed Amin. 2004. The’perpetual dissident’ finally becomes CM. May 13. www.rediff.com, http://www.rediff.com/election/2004/may/13ysr.htm. Accessed 8 June 2012.
Jose, Vinod, K. 2012. The Emperor Uncrowned. The rise of Narendra Modi. Caravan: A Journal of politics and culture. March 11. http://www.caravanmagazine.in/reportage/emperor-uncrowned.
Karan, Kavita. 2009. Political Communication in India. In A Political Communication in Asia, ed. Lars Willnat, and Annette Aw, 191–215. New York, NY: Routledge.
Katyal, Ritika. 2014. From Chaiwallah to Chief Minister: Modi’s eventful journey. The South Asian Channel. June 25. http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/06/25/from-chaiwallah-to-chief-minister-modis-eventful-journey/.Accessed 2 July 2015.
Kumara, Prasanna. 2014. How much does it cost to set up a TV channel in India? Quora. July 12. https://www.quora.com/How-much-does-it-cost-to-set-up-a-TV-channel-in-India.
L K Advani website. 1990. ‘Ram Rath Yatra’ September—October 1990. http://www.lkadvani.in/eng/content/view/449/295/. Accessed 15 May 2012.
Mehta, N. 2009. Television in India: Satellites, politics and cultural change, 2nd ed. New Delhi: Routledge.
Mishra, Pankaj. 2015. Narendra Modi: The divisive manipulator who charmed the world? The Guardian. November 9. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/09/narendra-modi-the-divisive-manipulator-who-charmed-the-world?CMP=share_btn_fb.
Narayanswamy, Harihar. 2009. Do popular ad campaigns win elections. Economic Times. May 27. http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2009-05-27/news/27638366_1_political-advertising-campaigns-general-election. Accessed 22 June 2012.
Neuman, W.R., M.R. Just, and A.N. Crigler. 1992. Common Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ninan, Sevanti. 2013. Surrogate media ownership. In Opinion. www.thehoot.org. November 2. http://www.thehoot.org/media-watch/opinion/surrogate-media-ownership-7142.
Norris, P. 1995. The restless searchlight: Network news framing of the post-cold war world. Political Communication 12: 357–370.
Norris, P. 2007. A virtuous circle, Political communication in post-industrial societies. In The Political Communication Reader ed Ralph Negrine and James Stanyer, 111–115, NY: Routledge.
Pan, Zhongdang, and Gerald M. Kosicki. 1993. Framing Analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication 10: 55–75.
Patterson, T. 1993. Out of order. New York: Knopf.
Price, V., D. Tewksbury, and E. Powers. 1997. Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Communication Research 24: 481–506.
Reddy, Krishna G. 2009. Forging Public Opinion: The Press, Television and electoral campaigns in Andhra Pradesh In The Indian Public Sphere: Readings in Media History, ed. Arvind Rajagopal, 228–244. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Sahi, Ajit. 2009. Eating The Cake And The Cherry. Tehelka Magazine, May 30. http://www.tehelka.com/story_main41.asp?filename=Ne300509eating_the.asp. Accessed 6 June 2012.
Scheufele, D.A. 1999. Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication 49 (1): 103–122.
Scheufele, D.A. 2000. Agenda Setting, Priming and Framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication and Society 3 (2 and 3): 297–316.
Shaw, Padmaja. 2012. More or less news. Posted/Updated on September 11. www.thehoot.org, http://www.thehoot.org/media-watch/media-business/more-or-less-news-6255. Accessed 15 Sep 2012.
Thakur, Aditya. 2013. Top 7 Indian Channels That Are Owned By Politicians! August 21. http://hillpost.in/2013/08/top-7-indian-channels-that-are-owned-by politicians/95166/comment-page-2/
Thakurtha, Paranjoy. 2012. Media ownership trends in India. Posted/Updated on July 03. www.thehoot.org. Accessed 10 Sep 2012.
Tuchman, G. 1978. Making News: A construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
Valkenburg, Patti M., and Holli A. Semetko. 2000. Framing European politics: A content analysis of print and television. Journal of Communication 50 (2): 93–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x.
Vreese, de, C.H. 2002. Framing Europe: television news and European integration. Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers.
Vreese, de, C.H. 2003. Television reporting of second order elections. Journalism Studies 4: 183–198.
Weaver, D., McCombs M., and Shaw D.L. 1998. Agenda-setting research. Recent developments in place and focus. Paper presented at the annual convention of the World Association for Public Opinion Research, St. Louis, MO.
www.mib.gov.in. Total no. of TV channels permitted as on 29.12.2015. TV channels authorized for uplinking from india = 732. Ministry of I&B. http://mib.nic.in/writereaddata/html_en_files/tvchannels/status_at_a_glance.pdf. Accessed 16 Aug 2015
www.rediff.com Andhra Pradesh is in shock: YSR’s death leads to a spate of suicides. Last updated on September 04, 2009. http://news.rediff.com/report/2009/sep/04/sixty-people-lose-lives-in-ap-after-ysr-death.htm. Accessed 6 May 2012.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gudipaty, N. (2017). Television, Political Imagery, and Elections in India. In: Ngwainmbi, E. (eds) Citizenship, Democracies, and Media Engagement among Emerging Economies and Marginalized Communities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56215-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56215-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56214-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56215-5
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)