How Can Accurate Landing Stats Help in Designing Better Fisheries and Environmental Management for Western Atlantic Estuaries?

  • Mário BarlettaEmail author
  • André R. A. Lima
  • David V. Dantas
  • Igor M. Oliveira
  • Jurandyr Reis Neto
  • Cezar A. F. Fernandes
  • Eduardo G. G. Farias
  • Jorge L. R. Filho
  • Monica F. Costa
Part of the Coastal Research Library book series (COASTALRL, volume 21)


Fisheries in Brazil, the country with most territory in South America, is not comprehensive at all. The lack of precise historical data is the main concern faced by perspectives of fishery management. The majority of data are simplistic records of extrapolated biomass published by federal entities regardless the habitat from where fish resources were harvested, how they were captured and lengths of capture. Little attention was given to the social, economic and cultural aspects of traditional communities and their livelihood. Worst is the case of estuarine systems of the Western Atlantic, where artisanal fishery rules the landings and the absence of proper monitoring, control and surveillance leads to poor managerial actions. As a result, fishery studies conclude that most fish stocks of Western Atlantic estuaries show signs of over-exploitation. Palliative measures such as closed periods for capture of common resources has emerged as urgent option aiming to reduce the impacts of overfishing. Bycatch reduction devices are examples of emerging options. Fishery management of Brazilian estuaries urges accelerated actions: introduce rights and duties-based fishery management to guarantee the declaration of every fisherman activities; enable fishers to organize themselves through the idea of ecological sustainability and economic efficiency; and acquiring daily reports of fish landings through stakeholder approach and co-management. Fishery pressure is not the unique responsible for reduced estuarine production. Bycatch due to small-mesh nets, oxygen-consuming effluents, emerging pollutants, solid wastes, deforestation of mangrove forest for human purposes and human-driven changes in river flow and estuarine morphology are rapidly changing the nature of a nursery environment. Co-management, long-term data and daily reports on production can help to design stock assessment models, understand variations in biomass over time, detect problems of uncontrolled fishing effort, point periods of seasonal habits for each fishery resource, and, most importantly, guarantee that enough juveniles of each living resource can be recruited to adult stocks. The compliance of ecological data and biological research, robust data for landing stats and the social profile of the fishery community seems to be the ideal approach to build proper rules of co-management in Western Atlantic estuaries.


South American estuaries Estuarine conservation Co-management Fishery impacts Fish resources overexploitation Coastal management 



Authors acknowledge the financial support from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) through grant Proc.405818/2012-2/COAGR/PESCA; Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado de Pernambuco (FACEPE) through grant APQ–0911–108/12 and BFP-0130-1.08/15; the Fishers Association of Piaçabuçu (Z19) for the integrated work on fishery statistics; CODEVASF Fisheries Resources and Aquaculture Integrated Centre of Betume, at Neópolis Sergipe State, for the local rainfall data. MB and MFC are CNPq Fellows.


  1. Able KW (2005) A re-examination of fish estuarine dependence: evidence for connectivity between estuarine and ocean habitats. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 64:5–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alverson DL, Freeberg MH, Murawski SA, Pope JG (1994) A global assessment of fisheries bycatch and discards. FAO Fisheries Technical. n° 339 233 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Amaral E, Sousa IS, Gonçalves ACT, Braga R, Ferraz P, Carvalho G (2011) Manejo De Pirarucus (Arapaima gigas) em Lagos De Várzea de Uso Exclusivo de Pescadores Urbanos. Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá – IDSM/OS/MCT. Programa de Manejo de Pesca – PMP. 78 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. ANA – Agência Nacional de Águas (2002) A Evolução da Gestão dos Recursos Hídricos no Brasil. Edição Comemorativa do Dia Mundial da Água. Brasília. 68p.Google Scholar
  5. Andrade HA (1998) Programa de Manejo de Pesca – PMP. Notas Técnicas Facimar 2:1–16Google Scholar
  6. Andrade IM (2012) Diversidade de Fanerógamas do Delta do Parnaíba. In: Anderson G (ed) Biodiversidade do Delta do Parnaíba: litoral piauiense, vol 1, 1st edn. EDUFPI, Teresina, pp 61–76Google Scholar
  7. Araújo JS, Sá MFP (2008) Sustentabilidade da Piscicultura no Baixo São Francisco Alagoano: Condicionantes Socioeconômicos. Ambiente Sociedade Campinas 11(2):405–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bannwart JP (2014) A pesca artesanal em Santa Catarina. EPAGRI – Boletim Didático 113 56pGoogle Scholar
  9. Barletta M, Costa MF (2009) Living and non-living resources exploitation in a tropical semi-arid estuary. J Coast Res SI 56:371–375Google Scholar
  10. Barletta M, Saint-Paul U (2010) Distribution pattern of fish in a mangrove estuary. Ecol Stud 211:171–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barletta M, Barletta-Bergan A, Saint-Paul U, Hubold G (2005) The role of salinity in structuring the fish assemblages in a tropical estuary. J Fish Biol 66:45–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barletta M, Amaral CS, Corrêa MFM, Guebert F, Dantas DV, Lorenzi L, Saint-Paul U (2008) Factors affecting seasonal variations in demersal fish assemblages at an ecocline in a tropical-subtropical estuary. J Fish Biol 73:1329–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Barletta M, Jaureguizar AJ, Baigun C, Fontoura NF, Agostinho AA, Almeida-Val VMF, Val AL, Torres RA, Jimenes-Segura LF, Giarrizzo T, Fabré NN, Batista VS, Lasso C, Taphorn DC, Costa MF, Chaves PT, Vieira JP, Corrêa MFM (2010) Fish and aquatic habitat conservation in South America: a continental overview with emphasis on neotropical systems. J Fish Biol 76:2118–2176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Barletta M, Lucena LRR, Costa MF, Barbosa-Cintra SCT, Cysneiros FJA (2012) The interaction rainfall vs. weight as determinant of total mercury concentration in fish from a tropical estuary. Environ Pollut 167:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Barletta M, Cysneiros FJA, Lima ARA (2016) Effects of dredging operations on the demersal fish fauna of a South American tropical–subtropical transition estuary. J Fish Biol 89:890–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Barletta M, Lima ARA, Costa MF, Dantas DVD (2017 in press) Estuarine ecoclines and the Associated fauna: ecological information as the basis for ecosystem conservation. In: Finkl CW, Makowski C (eds) Coastal wetlands: Alteration and Remediation Springer, Cham doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-56179-0_16
  17. Barletta-Bergan A, Barletta M, Saint-Paul U (2002a) Community structure and temporal variability of ichthyoplankton in North Brazilian mangrove creeks. J Fish Biol 61:33–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Barletta-Bergan A, Barletta M, Saint-Paul U (2002b) Structure and seasonal dynamics of larval fish in the Caeté River Estuary in North Brazil. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 54:193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Beck MW, Heck KL Jr, Able KW, Childers DL, Eggleston DB, Gillanders BM, Halpern B, Hays CG, Hoshino K, Minello TJ, Orth RJ, Sheridan PF, Weinstein MP (2001) The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. Bioscience 51:633–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Berasategui AD, Acha EM, Fernández Araoz NC (2004) Spatial patterns of ichthyoplankton assemblages in the Rio de la Plata estuary (Argentina, Uruguay). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 60:599–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Berkes F (2009) Social aspects of fishery management. In: Cochrane KL, Garcia SM (eds) A fishery manager’s guidebook. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, pp 52–74. 518 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Berkes F, Mahon R, McConney P, Pollnac R, Pomeroy R (2001) Managing small-scale fisheries: alternative directions and methods. IDRC, Ottawa. 212 ppGoogle Scholar
  23. Bittencourt ACSP, Dominguez JML, Fontes LCS, Sousa DL, Silva IR, Silva FR (2007) Wave refraction, river damming, and episodes of severe shoreline erosion: the São Francisco River Mouth, Northeastern Brazil. J Coast Res 234:930–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Blaber SJM (1997) Fish and fisheries of tropical estuaries. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Blaber SJM (2000) Tropical estuarine fishes: ecology, exploitation and conservation. Blackwell Science, Malden, Oxford (England). 372 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Blaber SJM (2002) ‘Fish in hot water’: the challenges facing fish and fisheries research in tropical estuaries. J Fish Biol 61:1–20Google Scholar
  27. Blaber SJM (2013) Fishes and fisheries in tropical estuaries: the last 10 years. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 135:57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Blaber SJM, Barletta M (2016) A review of estuarine fish research in South America: what has been achieved and what is the future for sustainability and conservation? J Fish Biol 89:537–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Braga RAP (2000) Caracterização das zonas estuarinas de Pernambuco. In: Seminário internacional perspectivas e implicações da carcinicultura estuarina no estado de Pernambuco. Projeto PRORENDA, 172 ppGoogle Scholar
  30. Branco JO, Verani JR (2006) Análise quali-quantitativa da ictiofauna acompanhante da pesca do camarão sete-barbas na Armação do Itapocoroy, Penha, Santa Catarina. Rev Bras Zootec 23:381–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Broadhurst MK, Suuronen P, Hulme A (2006) Estimating collateral mortality from towed fishing gear. Fish Fish 7:180–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Broadhurst MK, Brand CP, Kennely SJ (2012) Evolving and devolving bycatch reduction devices in an Australian penaeid-trawl fishery. Fish Res 112:68–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Burger R (2008) Ictiofauna do Baixo Rio São Francisco à Jusante da Barragem de Xingó: Inventário e Caracterização Taxonômica. Monografia (Ciências Biológicas). Curso de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador – BA, 139 ppGoogle Scholar
  34. Campbell L, Cornwell M (2008) Human dimensions of bycatch reduction technology: current assumptions and directions for future research. Endanger Species Res 5:325–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Campos A, Mobley J, Monteiro O, Ramires G, Silva WG (2015) Aves costeiras da APA do Delta do Parnaíba. Aquasis, Parnaíba. 101 ppGoogle Scholar
  36. Carvalho JNF, Gomes JMA (2006) Indicadores socioeconômicos dos trabalhadores da extração do pó cerífero da carnaúba. In: Gomes JMA, Santos KB, Silva MS (eds) Cadeia produtiva da cera de carnaúba: diagnóstico e cenários. EDUFPI, Teresina, pp 119–129Google Scholar
  37. Castello JP, Sunye PS, Haimovici M, Hellebrandt D (2009) Fisheries in southern Brazil: a comparison of their management and sustainability. J Appl Ichthyol 25:287–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Castilla JC, Defeo O (2005) Paradigm shifts needed for world fisheries. Science 309:1324–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Castro RH, Costa RC, Fransozo A, Mantelatto FLM (2004) Population structure of the seabod shrimp Xiphopenaeus kroyeri (Heller, 1862) (Crustacea: Penaeoidea) in the littoral of São Paulo, Brasil. Sci Mar 69:105–112Google Scholar
  40. CBHSF – Comitê da Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio São Francisco (2004) Plano de Recursos Hídricos da Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio São Francisco. Módulo 1, Resumo Executivo. ANA/GEF/PNUMA/OEA. Salvador, 28 de junho de 2004, 219 ppGoogle Scholar
  41. Charles AT (2001) Sustainable fishery systems. Blackwell Science, Oxford. 367 ppGoogle Scholar
  42. Cochrane KL, Garcia SM (2009) Introduction – fisheries management. In: Cochrane KL, Garcia SM (eds) A fishery manager’s guidebook, 2nd edn. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Wiley-Blackwell publishers, West Sussex, pp 1–17. 518 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Coelho PA, Santos MCF (1995) A Pesca de Camarões Marinhos ao Largo da Foz do São Francisco (AL/SE). Trab Oceanog Uni Fed PE, Recife 23:149–161Google Scholar
  44. Costa FJC (2003) Recomposição da Ictiofauna Reofílica do Baixo São Francisco. Resumo Executivo do Relatório Final. Projeto de Gerenciamento Integrado das Atividades Desenvolvidas em Terra na Bacia do São Francisco ANA/GEF/PNUMA/OEA. Instituto de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico de Xingó, Instituto Xingó, 74 ppGoogle Scholar
  45. Costa MF, Barletta M (2016) Special challenges in the conservation of fishes and aquatic environments of South America. J Fish Biol 89:4–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Costa MF, Barbosa SCT, Barletta M, Dantas DV, Kehrig HA, Seixas TG, Malm O (2009) Seasonal differences in mercury accumulation in Trichiurus lepturus (Cutlassfish) in relation to length and weight in a northeast Brazilian Estuary. Environ Sci Pollut Res 16:423–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Csirke J (1984) Chapter 2: report of the working group on fisheries management, implications and interactions. In: Csirke J, Sharp GD (eds) Reports of the expert consultation to examine changes in abundance and species composition of neritic fish resources. FAO Fisheries Report 291: 67–90Google Scholar
  48. Dallas KL, Barnard PL (2009) Linking human impacts within an estuary to ebb-tidal delta evolution. J Coast Res SI 56:713–716Google Scholar
  49. Dantas DV, Barletta M (2016) Habitat use by Centropomus undecimalis in a rocky area of estuarine beach in north-east Brazil. J Fish Biol 89:793–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Dantas DV, Barletta M, Costa MF, Barbosa-Cintra SCT, Possatto FE, Ramos JAA, Lima ARA, Saint-Paul U (2010) Movement patterns of catfishes (Ariidae) in a tropical semi-arid estuary. J Fish Biol 76:2540–2557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Dantas DV, Barletta M, Costa MF (2012) The seasonal and spatial patterns of ingestion of polyfilament nylon fragments by estuarine drums (Sciaenidae). Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:600–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Dantas DV, Barletta M, Costa MF (2015) Feeding ecology and seasonal diet overlap between Stellifer brasiliensis and Stellifer stellifer in a tropical estuarine ecocline. J Fish Biol 86:707–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Daura-Jorge FG (2011) Quantos? Onde? Como? Múltiplos aspectos ecológicos de uma população do boto-da-tainha (Tursiops truncatus) em Laguna, sul do Brasil: implicações para conservação. Universidade Federa do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil. 264 ppGoogle Scholar
  54. Diegues AC (2008) Marine protected areas and artisanal fisheries in Brazil. International Collective in Support of Fishworkers. SAMUDRA Monograph. 68 ppGoogle Scholar
  55. Dominguez JM (1996) The Sao Francisco strandplain: a paradigm for wave-dominated deltas? In: De Batist M, Jacobs P (eds) Geology of siliciclastic shelf seas. Geological Society, London, pp 217–231Google Scholar
  56. Dyke JG, Weaver IS (2013) The emergence of environmental homeostasis in complex ecosystems. PLoS Comput Biol 9:e1003050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Eayrs S (2007) A guide to bycatch reduction in tropical shrimp-trawl fisheries, Revised edn. Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome. 108 ppGoogle Scholar
  58. Eide A (2009) Economic principles: an economic perspective on fishing. In: Cochrane KL, Garcia SM (eds) A fishery manager’s guidebook, 2nd edn. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Wiley-Blackwell publishers, West Sussex, pp 75–101. 518 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Elliott M, Quintino V (2007) The estuarine quality paradox, environmental homeostasis and the difficulty of detecting anthropogenic stress in naturally stressed areas. Mar Pollut Bull 54:640–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. ESTATPESCA (2010) Estatística da pesca 2010 Brasil: grandes regiões e unidades da federação. IBAMA, Brasília. 113 ppGoogle Scholar
  61. FAO – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (1995) Code of conduct for responsible fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, Rome. 42 ppGoogle Scholar
  62. FAO – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (1997) Technical guidelines for responsible fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, Rome. 91 ppGoogle Scholar
  63. FAO – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2008) Global study of shrimp fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, Rome. 475 ppGoogle Scholar
  64. FAO – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2011) Review of the state of world marine fishery resources. Technical paper, 569. Rome, Italy, 336 ppGoogle Scholar
  65. Farias ACS, Fonteles-Filho AA, Ivo CTC, Fernandes CAF, Cunha FEA (2015) Cadeia produtiva da pesca no interior do Delta do Parnaíba e área marinha adjacente, 1st edn. RDS Gráfica e Editora, Fortaleza. 240 ppGoogle Scholar
  66. Felippe MF, Maia-Rodriguez BH, Junior APM (2009) Uso de técnicas de sensoriamento remoto na análise da dinâmica morfológica da foz do rio São Francisco no período de 1979 a 2008. In: XIV Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, 2009, Natal, Brasil, pp 3737–3744Google Scholar
  67. Fernandes CAF (2015) Aspectos reprodutivos em peixes dos estuários dos rios Timonha e Ubatuba (PI/CE). In: Pereira AML, Rocha FMRA (eds) Pesca no estuário do Timonha e Ubatuba (PI/CE). Comissão Ilha Ativa. Sieart, Parnaíba. 98 ppGoogle Scholar
  68. Ferreira GVB, Barletta M, Lima ARA, Dantas DV, Justino AKS, Costa MF (2016) Plastic debris contamination in the life cycle of Acoupa weakfish Cynoscion acoupa in a tropical estuary. ICES J Mar Sci. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsw108 Google Scholar
  69. Fidem (1987) Região Metropolitana do Recife: Reservas Ecológicas. Recife, Governo do Estado de Pernambuco, Secretaria de Planejamento do Estado de Pernambuco, Fundação de Desenvolvimento da Região Metropolitana do Recife, 108 ppGoogle Scholar
  70. Frangoudes K, Marugán-Pintos B, Pascual-Fernández JJ (2008) From open access to co-governance and conservation: the case of women shellfish collectors in Galicia (Spain). Mar Policy 32:223–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. GAP – Grupo de Apoio à Pesca (1998) Investimentos com desenvolvimento. Relatório Final, 35 ppGoogle Scholar
  72. Garcia SM, Zerbi A, Aliaume C, Do Chi T, Lasserre GFA (2003) The ecosystem approach to fisheries. Issues, terminology, principles, institutional foundations implementation and outlook, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 443. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  73. Gasalla MA, Rodrigues AM, Duarte LFA, Sumaila UR (2010) A comparative multi-fleet analysis of socio-economic indicators for fishery management in SE Brazil. Prog Oceanogr 87:304–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Gillett R (2008) Global study of shrimp fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. n° 475, 359 ppGoogle Scholar
  75. Godinho AL, Godinho HP (2003) Breve visão do São Francisco. In: Godinho HP, Godinho AL (eds) Águas, peixes e pescadores do São Francisco das Minas Gerais. PUC Minas, Belo Horizonte, pp 15–25Google Scholar
  76. Gois JA, Paiva MFA, Tavares SMG (1992) Projetos de Irrigação no Vale do Baixo São Francisco. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada – IPEA. 44 ppGoogle Scholar
  77. Gonzalez J, Stotz W, Garrido J, Orensanz JM, Parma AM, Tapia C, Zuleta A (2006) The chilean turf system: how is it performing in the case of the loco fishery? Bull Mar Sci 78:499–527Google Scholar
  78. Graça-Lopes R, Tomás ARG, Tutui ESR, Severino-Rodrigues E, Puzzi A (2002) Comparação da dinâmica de Desembarques de frotas camaroeiras do Estado Avaliação de dispositivos para redução da ictiofauna acompanhante de São Paulo, Brasil, vol 28. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca, São Paulo, pp 163–171Google Scholar
  79. Guebert FM, Barletta M, Costa MF (2013) Threats to sea turtle populations in the Western Atlantic: poaching and mortality in small-scale fishery gears. J Coast Res 65:42–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Guebert-Bartholo FM, Barletta M, Costa MF, Lucena LR, Pereira da Silva C (2011) Fishery and the use of space in a tropical semi-arid estuarine region of Northeast Brazil: subsistence and overexploitation. J Coast Res SI 64:398–402Google Scholar
  81. Guzzi A (2012) Biodiversidade do Delta do Parnaíba: litoral piauiense. EDUFPI, Parnaíba. 466 ppGoogle Scholar
  82. Haimovici M, Mendonça JT (1996) Descartes da fauna acompanhante na pesca de arrasto de tangones dirigida a linguados e camarões na plataforma continental do sul do Brasil. Atlântica, Rio Grande. Brasil. n° 18, pp 161–177Google Scholar
  83. Hall GB, Close CH (2007) Local knowledge assessment for a small-scale fishery using geographic information systems. Fish Res 83:11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Henkes SL (2014) A política, o direito e o desenvolvimento: um estudo sobre a transposição do Rio São Francisco. Rev Direito GV 10:497–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Hoffmeyer MS, Menéndez MC, Biancalana F, Nizovoy AM, Torres ER (2009) Ichthyoplankton spatial pattern in the inner shelf off Bahía Blanca Estuary, SW Atlantic Ocean. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 84:383–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. IBAMA – Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis (2001) Boletim Estatístico da Pesca Marítima e Estuarina do Nordeste do Brasil. Tamandaré, 2002. 140 ppGoogle Scholar
  87. IBAMA – Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis (2004) Boletim Estatístico da Pesca Marítima e Estuarina do Nordeste do Brasil. Tamandaré, 2005. 79 ppGoogle Scholar
  88. IBAMA – Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis (2005) Boletim Estatístico da Pesca Marítima e Estuarina do Nordeste do Brasil. Tamandaré, 2006. 217 ppGoogle Scholar
  89. IBAMA – Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis (2006) Boletim Estatístico da Pesca Marítima e Estuarina do Nordeste do Brasil. Tamandaré, 2007. 157 ppGoogle Scholar
  90. IBAMA – Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis (2007) Boletim Estatístico da Pesca Marítima e Estuarina do Nordeste do Brasil. Tamandaré, 2008. 224 ppGoogle Scholar
  91. IBAMA – Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis (2008a) Estatística da pesca 2006 Brasil – Grandes regiões e unidades da Federação. 174 ppGoogle Scholar
  92. IBAMA – Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis (2008b) Instrução Normativa n° 171, de 09 de Maio de 2008. Diário Oficial da União Seção 1, n° 89, 4 ppGoogle Scholar
  93. Isaac VJ, Martins AS, Haimovici M, Castello JP, Andrigetto Filho JM (2006) Síntese do estado de conhecimento sobre a pesca marinha e estuarina do Brasil. In: Isaac VJ, Martins AS, Haimovici M, Andrigetto Filho JM (eds) A pesca marinha e estuarina do Brasil no início do século XXI: Recursos, tecnologias, aspectos socioeconômicos e institucionais. UFPA, Belém, pp 181–186Google Scholar
  94. Isaac VJ, Espírito-Santo RV, Saint-Paul U (2010) Fisheries and management. In: Saint-Paul U, Schneider H (eds) Mangrove dynamics and management in North Brazil, ecological studies 211. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 233–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Ivar do Sul JA, Costa MF, Silva-Cavalcanti JS, Araújo MCB (2014) Plastic debris retention and exportation by a mangrove forest patch. Mar Pollut Bull 78:252–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Kelleher K (2005) Discards in the world’s marine fisheries. An update, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. n° 470. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome. 131 ppGoogle Scholar
  97. Kesteven GLL (1973) An introduction to fisheries science. FAO, Rome. 43 ppGoogle Scholar
  98. King M (2007) Fisheries biology, assessment and management, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishing, Toogoom. 382 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Kjerfve B (1994) Coastal lagoons. In: Kjerfve B (ed) Coastal lagoons processes. Elsevier Scientist Publysher, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  100. Knoppers BA, Medeiros PRP, Souza WFL, Oliveira EM, Lorenzzetti J, Jennerjahn TC, Santos-Junior RC (2007) Impacto de Barragens Sobre o Transporte de Água e Matéria na Interface Terra-Mar do Rio São Francisco (SE/AL). In: XII Congresso Latino-Americano de Ciências do Mar – XII COLACMAR, Florianópolis, 3 ppGoogle Scholar
  101. Lackey RT (2005) Fisheries: history, science, and management. In: Lehr JH, Keeley J (eds) Water encyclopedia: surface and agricultural water. Wiley, New York, pp 121–129. 781 ppGoogle Scholar
  102. Lana PC, Camargo MG, Brogim RA, Isaac VJ (1996) O bentos da costa brasileira. Avaliação crítica e levantamento bibliográfico (1858–1996). FEMAR, Rio de Janeiro. 432 ppGoogle Scholar
  103. Legat JFA, Legat AP, Castro PF, Pereira AML, Góes JM, Fernandes-Góes LC (2005) Current fishery status of Ucides cordatus (Linnaeus, 1763) (Brachyura, Ocypodidae) in the Parnaíba Delta Region, Brazil. Nauplius 13:65–70Google Scholar
  104. Lemos VM, Verea AS Jr, Schwingel PR, Muelbert JH, Vieira JP (2014) Migration and reproductive biology of Mugil liza (Teleostei: Mugilidae) in south Brazil. J Fish Biol 85:671. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Lima ESF (2012) Ictiofaúna do Delta do Rio Parnaíba. In: Guzzi A (ed) Biodiversidade do Delta do Parnaíba: litoral piauiense, vol 1, 1st edn. EDUFPI, Teresina, pp 140–207Google Scholar
  106. Lima TVPC (2013) Os impactos da transposição do Rio São Francisco na sua região de influência. Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil. 100 ppGoogle Scholar
  107. Lima ARA, Barletta M (2016) Lunar influence on prey availability, diet shifts and niche overlap between Engraulidae larvae in tropical mangrove creeks. J Fish Biol 89:2133–2152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Lima JEFW, Santos PMC, Chaves AGM, Scilewski LR (2001) Diagnóstico do Fluxo de Sedimentos em Suspensão na Bacia do Rio São Francisco. Embrapa/ANEEL/ANA/SIH/MMA, Planaltina-DF. 99 ppGoogle Scholar
  109. Lima ARA, Costa MF, Barletta M (2014) Distribution patterns of microplastics within the plankton of a tropical estuary. Environ Res 132:146–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Lima ARA, Barletta M, Costa MF (2015) Seasonal distribution and interactions between plankton and microplastics in a tropical estuary. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 165:213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Lima ARA, Barletta M, Costa MF, Ramos JAA, Dantas DV, Justino AKS, Ferreira GVB (2016) Changes in the composition of ichthyoplankton assemblage and plastic debris in mangrove creeks relative to moon phases. J Fish Biol 89:619–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Longhurst A (2010) Mismanagement of marine fisheries. Cambridge University Press, New York. 320 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Lopes SB (2015) Análise da biologia alimentar de raias (Elasmobranchii, Batoidea) no Delta do Parnaíba, Brasil. Monografia (Aperfeiçoamento/Especialização em Bioecologia, Genética e Aquicultura), Universidade Estadual do Piauí, 47 ppGoogle Scholar
  114. Lorenzo MI, Díaz de Astarloa JM, Norbis W, Cousseau MB (2011) Long term fish assemblages as units of management in a temperate estuary (Rio de La Plata – SW Atlantic Ocean). Braz J Oceanogr 59:43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Lotze HK, Lenihan HS, Bourque BJ, Bradbury RH, Cooke RG, Kay MC, Kidwell SM, Kirby MX, Peterson CH, Jackson JBC (2006) Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas. Science 312:1806–1809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Lucena FP, Cabral E, Santos MCF, Oliveira VS, Bezerra TRQ (2013) A pesca de currais para peixes no litoral de Pernambuco. Bol Técnico Científico CEPENE, Tamandaré 19(1):93–102Google Scholar
  117. Mai ACG, Loebmann D (2010) Biodiversidade do Litoral do Piauí. Guia Ilustrado Sorocaba (SP), Paratodos. 272 ppGoogle Scholar
  118. Martino EJ, Houde ED (2010) Recruitment of striped bass in Chesapeake Bay: spatial and temporal environmental variability and availability of zooplankton prey. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 409:213–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. McLusky M, Elliott M (2004) The estuarine ecosystem: ecology, threats and management, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 223 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Medeiros SL (2004) Proposta de ferramenta para tornar a pesca artesanal extrativista de camarão do Complexo Lagunar da região sul de Santa Catarina em projetos autossustentáveis. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 154 ppGoogle Scholar
  121. Medeiros PRP, Oliveira AM, Lima ELR, Hernandez AO, Silva WF (2008) Abordagem Preliminar da Intrusão Salina no Estuário do Rio São Francisco (AL/SE). In: III Congresso Brasileiro de Oceanografia – CBO; I Congresso Ibero-Americano de Oceanografia - I CIAO. Fortaleza, 3 ppGoogle Scholar
  122. Medeiros PRP, Knoppers BA, Cavalcante GH, Souza WFL (2011) Changes in nutrient loads (N, P and Si) in the São Francisco Estuary after the construction of dams. Braz Arch Biol Technol 54(2):387–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Melo FAG (2012) Espécies comerciais de peixes do delta do Parnaíba, Litoral Piauiense. In: Guzzi A (org). Biodiversidade do Delta do Parnaíba: litoral piauiense. 1st ed. Teresina: EDUFPI, vol. 1, pp 140–207Google Scholar
  124. Melo FAG, Dutra EA, Vianna JQ, Araújo TM, Souza ASF, Moura IS (2015) Guia de identificação de peixes do estuário dos Rios Timonha e Ubatuba, vol 1, 1st edn. Sieart, Parnaíba. 100 ppGoogle Scholar
  125. Mendes F (2003) Economia e desenvolvimento do Piauí. Fundação Monsenhor Chaves, Teresina. 458 ppGoogle Scholar
  126. Mendonça SAT (2006) A Influência do Conhecimento Tradicional na Formação de Políticas Públicas: O Caso da Pesca Artesanal do Rio São Francisco. Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos. Universidade de São Paulo, São Carlos. 371 ppGoogle Scholar
  127. de Mitcheson YS (2009) Biology and ecology considerations for the fishery manager. In: Cochrane KL, Garcia SM (eds) A fishery manager’s guidebook, 2nd edn. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Wiley-Blackwell publishers, West Sussex, pp 1–17. 518 ppGoogle Scholar
  128. MMA – Ministério do Meio Ambiente (2004a) Programa de Revitalização da Bacia Hidrográfica do rio São Francisco. 134 ppGoogle Scholar
  129. MMA – Ministério do Meio Ambiente (2004b) Instrução Normativa n° 14, de 14 de outubro de 2004. 2 ppGoogle Scholar
  130. MPA – Ministério da Pesca e Aquicultura. Pesca Artesanal (2011) Accessed 09 Sept 2016
  131. Nédélec C, Prado J (1990) Definición y clasificación de las diversas categorias de artes de pesca. Documento Técnico de Pesca, Rome: FAO/Dirección de Industrias Pesqueras, n° 222, vol. 1Google Scholar
  132. North EW, Houde ED (2003) Linking ETM physics, zooplankton prey, and fish early-life histories to striped bass Morone saxatilis and white perch M. americana recruitment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 260:219–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Ocampo-Thomason P (2006) Mangroves, people and cockles: impacts of the shrimp farming industry on mangrove communities in esmeraldas province, Ecuador. In: Hoanh CT, Tuong TP, Gowing JW, Hardy B (eds) Environment and livelihoods in tropical coastal zones: managing agriculture-fishery-aquaculture conflicts (comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture series). Oxford University Press, London, pp 140–153Google Scholar
  134. OCEANA (2015) Monitoramento da pesca da tainha Mugil liza (Valenciennes, 1836) no estado de Santa Catarina – safra 2015. Relatório Final. Centro de Ciências Tecnológicas da Terra e do Mar – CTTMar. Grupo de Estudos Pesqueiros – GEP. Universidade do Vale do Itajaí – UNIVALI, Itajaí, 45 ppGoogle Scholar
  135. Oliveira TRA (2012) Meu Lugar é o Rio: Aspectos Identitários e Territoriais da Comunidade de Pescadores Artesanais do Povoado Resina, Brejo Grande/SE. Pró-reitoria de Pesquisa e Ensino em Pós-graduação, Departamento de Educação - Campus VIII, Universidade do Estado da Bahia, Paulo Afonso, 82 ppGoogle Scholar
  136. Oliveira AM, Medeiros PRP, Lima ELR, Hernandez AO (2008) Dinâmica da Formação da Cunha Salina no Estuário do Rio São Francisco. In: In: III Congresso Brasileiro de Oceanografia – CBO; I Congresso Ibero-Americano de Oceanografia – I CIAO. Fortaleza, 3 ppGoogle Scholar
  137. Ooi AL, Chong VC (2011) Larval fish assemblages in a tropical mangrove estuary and adjacent coastal waters: offshore-inshore flux of marine and estuarine species. Cont Shelf Res 31:1599–1610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Paiva MP (1997) Recursos pesqueiros estuarinos e marinhos do Brasil. EUFC, FortalezaGoogle Scholar
  139. Paiva ACG, Chaves PT, Araújo ME (2013) Distribution of estuarine fish fauna along coast of Brazil. Trop Oceanogr. ISSN 1679–3013, 36 ppGoogle Scholar
  140. Pauly D, Maclean JL (2003) In a perfect ocean: the state of fisheries and ecosystems in the North Atlantic Ocean. Island Press, Washington, DC. 192 ppGoogle Scholar
  141. Pauly D, Christensen V, Guénette S, Pitcher T, Sumaila U, Walters C, Watson R, Zeller D (2002) Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature 418:689–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Pitcher TJ, Watson R, Forrest R, Valtýsson HÞ, Guénette S (2002) Estimating illegal and unreported catches from marine ecosystems: a basis for change. Fish Fish 3:317–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Pompêo M (2008) Monitoramento e Manejo de Macrófitas Aquáticas. USP, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Ecologia. Oecologia Brasiliensis, pp 406–424Google Scholar
  144. Possatto FE, Barletta M, Costa MF, Ivar do Sul JA, Dantas DV (2011) Plastic debris ingestion by marine catfishes: an unexpected fisheries impact. Mar Pollut Bull 62:1098–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Potter IC, Tweedley JR, Elliott M, Whitfield AK (2013) The ways in which fish use estuaries: a refinement and expansion of the guild approach. Fish Fish 16:230–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Pruski FF, Pereira SB, Novaes LF, Silva DD, Ramos MM (2005) Comportamento hidrológico na foz do Rio São Francisco durante o período de 1950 a 1999. Nota Técnica. Engenharia na Agricultura, Viçosa, MG, vol. 13, n° 2, pp 118–123Google Scholar
  147. Raemaekers SJ-PN, Britz PJ (2009) Profile of the illegal abalone fishery (Haliotis midae) in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa: organised pillage and management failure. Fish Res 97:183–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Ramos JAA, Barletta M, Costa MF (2012) Ingestion of nylon threads by Gerreidae while using a tropical estuary as foraging grounds. Aquat Biol 17:29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Ramos JAA, Barletta M, Dantas DV, Costa MF (2016) Seasonal and spatial ontogenetic movement of Gerreidae in a Brazilian tropical estuarine ecocline and its application for nursery habitat conservation. J Fish Biol 89:696–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Rangely J, Fabré NN, Tiburtino C, Batista VS (2010) Estratégias de Pesca Artesanal no Litoral Marinho Alagoano (Brasil). Bol Inst da Pesca São Paulo 36:263–275Google Scholar
  151. Reis RE, Albert JS, Dario FD, Mincarones MM, Petry P, Rocha LA (2016) Fish biodiversity and conservation in South America. J Fish Biol 89:12–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Rieper A (2000) A economia ribeirinha e os tempos da natureza. Projeto Memória do Baixo São Francisco, 28 ppGoogle Scholar
  153. Ríos-Pulgarín MI, Barletta M, Mancera-Rodriguez NJ (2016) Hydrological cycle effects on the aquatic community in a Neotropical stream of the Andean piedmont during the 2007–2010 ENSO events. J Fish Biol 89:131–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Rueda M, Defeo O (2003) Linking fishery management and conservation in a tropical estuarine lagoon: biological and physical effects of an artisanal fishing gear. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 56:935–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Saint-Paul U, Barletta M (2010) Utilization of aquatic resources along the North Brazilian Coast with special reference to mangroves as fisheries nurseries. In: Hoanh, IWMI-SEA, Laos BS, University of Hawaii USA, KS Pheng. The Worldfish Centre, Malasya. An Ismail International Rice Research Institute, Phillipines. A noble IWMI SEA Laos Org). Tropical Deltas and coastal Zones: Food Production, communities and environmental at the land-water interface. Oxfordshire: CABI, pp 448–458Google Scholar
  156. Sampaio CLS, Paiva ACG, Silva ECS (2015) Peixes, Pesca e Pescadores do Baixo São Francisco, Nordeste do Brasil. pp 105–148. In: Nogueira SEM, SÁ MFP (Org.). A Pesca Artesanal no Baixo São Francisco: Atores, Recursos, Conflitos. Sociedade Brasileira de Ecologia Humana, SABEH, Petrolina, 199 ppGoogle Scholar
  157. Santos, MAS, Guerreiro-Filho MCS, Neves PRS, Aguiar CGG (2005) Análise Socioeconômica da Pesca Artesanal no Nordeste Paranaense. XLIII Congresso da SOBER, 20 ppGoogle Scholar
  158. Santos LCM, Matos HR, Schaeffer-Novelli Y, Cunha-Lignon M, Bitencourt MD, Koedam N, Dahdouh-Guebas F (2014) Anthropogenic activities on mangrove areas (São Francisco River Estuary, Brazil Northeast): a GIS-based analysis of CBERS and SPOT images to aid in local management. Ocean Coast Manag 89:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Schafer AG, Reis EG (2008) Artisanal fishing areas and traditional ecological knowledge: The case study of the artisanal fisheries of the Patos Lagoon estuary (Brazil). Mar Policy 32:283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Sheaves M, Baker R, Nagelkerken I, Connolly RM (2014) True value of estuarine and coastal nurseries for fish: incorporating complexity and dynamics. Estuar Coasts. doi: 10.1007/s12237-014-9846-x Google Scholar
  161. Silva LG (2001) A faina, festa e o rito: uma etnografia histórica sobre as gentes do mar (sec. XII ao XIX). Campinas, Papirus, 103 ppGoogle Scholar
  162. Silva WF (2009) Determinação da carga de material em suspensão no rio São Francisco: ano hidrológico 2007. Instituto de geografia, desenvolvimento e meio ambiente. Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Maceió. 48 ppGoogle Scholar
  163. Silva MC, Oliveira AS, Nunes GQ (2007) Caracterização Socioeconômica da Pesca Artesanal no Município de Conceição do Araguaia, Estado do Pará. Amazônia: Ci. & Desenv., Belém, vol. 2, n° 4, pp 37–51Google Scholar
  164. Silva DF, Galvício JD, Almeida HRRC (2010) Variabilidade da qualidade de água na bacia hidrográfica do Rio São Francisco e atividades antrópicas relacionadas. Qualit@s Revista Eletrônica, ISSN 1677–4280, vol. 9, n° 3, 17 ppGoogle Scholar
  165. Silva CELS, Vieira R, Kemenes A (2015) Monitoramento da qualidade da água no estuário dos rios Timonha e Ubatuba (PI/CE). In: Pereira, A. M. L. & Rocha, F. M. R. da. A pesca no estuário do Timonha e Ubatuba (PI/CE). Comissão Ilha Ativa. Sieart, Parnaíba. 98 ppGoogle Scholar
  166. Silva-Cavalcanti JS, Costa MF (2009) Fisheries in protected and non-protected areas: is it different? The case of Anomalocardia brasiliana at tropical estuaries of Northeast Brazil. J Coast Res SI 56:1454–1458Google Scholar
  167. Silva-Cavalcanti JS, Costa MF, Kehrig HA (2016) Total mercury (T-Hg) in Anomalocardia brasiliana (Mollusca) under different biological and environmental conditions. Lat Am J Aquat Res 44:267–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Silvano RAM, MacCord PFL, Lima RV, Begossi A (2006) When does this fish spawn? Fishermen’s local knowledge of migration and reproduction of Brazilian coastal fishes. Environ Biol Fish 76:71–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Silveira PCB, Mesquita B, Melo L, Oliveira Filho I (2013) Estuário, paisagem-fluxo de pescadores artesanais. Iluminuras Porto Alegre 14(34):304–323Google Scholar
  170. Souza MC (2007) Foz do Rio São Francisco. Instituto Amuirandê, Aracaju. 4 ppGoogle Scholar
  171. Souza LO (2015) Sonar de varredura como ferramenta para determinar ocorrência de peixes-boi marinhos no estuário dos rios Timonha e Ubatuba (PI/CE). In: Pereira AML, Rocha FMR (eds) A pesca no estuário do Timonha e Ubatuba (PI/CE). Comissão Ilha Ativa. Sieart, Parnaíba. 98 ppGoogle Scholar
  172. Souza MRM, Neumann-Leitão S (2000) Consequências socioeconômicas dos impactos antrópicos no Estuário do Rio São Francisco em Brejo Grande, Sergipe-Brasil, vol 28. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, pp 97–116Google Scholar
  173. Stolf R, Murakami JH, Maniero MA, Silva LCF, Soares MR (2012) Incorporação de régua para medida de profundidade no projeto do penetrômetro de impacto Stolf. Rev Bras Ciência Solo 5:1476–1482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Sunye PS, Pereira TJ, Russo A, Netto SA (2014) A pesca do camarão-rosa no Sistema Estuarino de Laguna, SC: História e acasos das políticas de manejo. In: Haimovici M, Andriguetto-Filho JM, Sunye PS (org). A pesca marinha e estuarina no Brasil: estudos de caso multidisciplinares. Rio Grande, Editora da FURG, 191 ppGoogle Scholar
  175. Tonial LSS (2011) Estrutura Populacional do Camarão Sete-barbas Xiphopenaeus kroyeri (HELLER, 1862) na Foz do Rio São Francisco, Nordeste do Brasil. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Biológicas). Universidade Federal de Alagoas/Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e da, Saúde, Maceió. 66 ppGoogle Scholar
  176. UNIVALI/CTTMar (2013) Boletim estatístico da pesca industrial de Santa Catarina – Ano 2012. Universidade do Vale do Itajaí. Centro de Ciências Tecnológicas da Terra e do Mar, Itajaí. 76 ppGoogle Scholar
  177. Viana JP, Castello L, Damasceno JMB, Amaral ESR, Estupiñán GMB, Arantes C, Batista GS, Garcez DS, Barbosa S (2007) Manejo Comunitário do Pirarucu Arapaima gigas na Reserva de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá -Amazonas, Brasil. In: Áreas Aquáticas Protegidas como Instrumento de Gestão Pesqueira, p 239–261. Ministério do Meio Ambiente e IBAMA, Brasília, 261 ppGoogle Scholar
  178. Vieira JPV, Vasconcellos MC, Silva RE, Fischer LG (1996) A rejeição da pesca do camarão-rosa (Penaeus paulensis) no estuário da Lagoa dos Patos, RS, Brasil. Atlantica 18:123–142Google Scholar
  179. Werner T, Kraus S, Read A, Zollett E (2006) Fishing techniques to reduce the bycatch of threatened marine animals. Mar Technol Soc J 40:50–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Whitfield AK (1999) Ichthyofaunal assemblages in estuaries: a South African case study. Rev Fish Biol Fish 9:151–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Williams J, Hindell JS, Swearer SE, Jenkins GP (2012) Influence of freshwater flows on the distribution of eggs and larvae of black bream Acanthopagrus butcheri within a drought-affected estuary. J Fish Biol 80:2281–2301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Worm B, Hilborn R, Baum JK, Branch TA, Collie JS, Costello C, Fogarty MJ, Fulton EA, Hutchings JA, Jennings S, Jensen OP, Lotze HK, Mace PM, McClanahan TR, Minto C, Palumbi SR, Parma AM, Ricard D, Rosenberg AA, Watson R, Zeller D (2009) Rebuilding global fisheries. Science 325:578–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Electronic References

  1. BIOMADE – Boletim Informativo Projeto BioMade (2015) Biodiversidade Marinha do Delta, 5 edn. Accessed 9 Sept 2016
  2. CBD – Convention on Biological Diversity (1992) Convention on Biological Diversity. Accessed 08 Aug 2016
  3. EPAGRI/CEPA (2010) Síntese Anual da Agricultura de Santa Catarina 2009–2010. Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina – EPAGRI, Centro de Socioeconomia e Planejamento Agrícola – CEPA. Florianópolis, SC. Accessed 12 Aug 2016
  4. EPAGRI/CEPA (2014) Síntese Anual da Agricultura de Santa Catarina 2013–2014. Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina – EPAGRI, Centro de Socioeconomia e Planejamento Agrícola – CEPA. Florianópolis, SC. Accessed 12 Aug 2016
  5. ICMBio – Instituto Chico Mendes para Conservação da Biodiversidade (2010) Plano de manejo para a área de proteção ambiental de Piaçabuçú. 497 pp. Acessed 16 Oct 2016
  6. IMA – Instituto do Meio Ambiente (2006) Plano de manejo da área de proteção ambiental do marituba do peixe. 217 pp. Acssed 16 Oct 2016
  7. Ribeiro LF, Holanda FSR, Araújo-Filho RN (2010) Indicadores ambientais para o estudo da contribuição da bioengenharia na sucessão ecológica da mata ciliar da margem direita do Rio São Francisco. Caminhos de Geografia. ISSN 1678–6343, 9 pp. Accessed 12 Aug 2016
  8. SDM. 2002. Secretária de Estado do Desenvolvimento Urbano e Meio Ambiente. Plano Integrado de Recursos Hídricos da Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Tubarão e Complexo Lagunar. Vol. II, 335 pp. Accessed 08 Aug 2016Google Scholar
  9. SPG – Secretária do Planejamento (2010) Implantação do Plano Estadual de Gerenciamento Costeiro – Fase I: Diagnóstico Sócio Ambiental Setor Centro-Sul. Governo do Estado de Santa Catarina, Secretaria de Estado do Planejamento, Diretoria de Desenvolvimento das Cidades. Accessed 12 Aug 2016
  10. UNCED – United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (1992). United Nation Sustainable development. Agenda 21. Rio de Janeiro Brazil, 351 pp. Accessed 08 Aug 2016
  11. UNCLOS – United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982). 208 pp. Accessed 08 Aug 2016

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mário Barletta
    • 1
    Email author
  • André R. A. Lima
    • 1
  • David V. Dantas
    • 2
  • Igor M. Oliveira
    • 3
  • Jurandyr Reis Neto
    • 3
  • Cezar A. F. Fernandes
    • 4
  • Eduardo G. G. Farias
    • 2
  • Jorge L. R. Filho
    • 2
  • Monica F. Costa
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratório de Ecologia e Gerenciamento de Ecossistemas Costeiros e Estuarinos (LEGECE), Departamento de OceanografiaUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)RecifeBrazil
  2. 2.Grupo de Tecnologia e Ciência Pesqueira (TECPESCA), Departamento de Engenharia de Pesca, Centro de Ensino Superior da Região Sul (CERES)Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)LagunaBrazil
  3. 3.Laboratório de Estudos da Pesca (LABPESCA), Unidade de Ensino Penedo, Campus ArapiracaUniversidade Federal de Alagoas (UFAL)PenedoBrazil
  4. 4.Laboratório de Bioecologia Pesqueira (Biopesca), Departamento de Ciências do MarUniversidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI)ParnaíbaBrazil

Personalised recommendations