Abstract
Prostate cancer is a leading cause of death world-widely and the third leading cause of cancer death in Northen American men. Prostate cancer causes parts of the prostate cells to lose normal control of growth and division. The Gleason classification system is one of the known systems used to grade the aggressiveness of the prostate progression.
In this study, an RNA-Seq dataset of 104 prostate cancer patients with different Gleason stages is analyzed using machine learning techniques to identify transcripts that are linked to prostate progression. The proposed method utilizes information gain as a ranker for feature selection to overcome the curse of dimensionality, because of dealing with a large number of features (41,971 transcripts). Minimum redundancy maximum relevance (MRMR) feature selection was applied on a one-versus-all hierarchical classification model to find the best subset of transcripts that predicts each stage. The Naive Bayes classifier was used at each node of the hierarchical model.
Naive Bayes is compared with support vector machine (SVM) for accuracy as performance measure. The results suggest that Naive Bayes outperforms SVM as a classifier in the hierarchical model. Several transcripts are found to be highly associated with different Gleason stages in prostate cancer patients.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fitzmaurice, C., Dicker, D., Pain, A., Hamavid, H., Moradi-Lakeh, M., MacIntyre, M., Allen, C., Hansen, G., Woodbrook, R., Wolfe, C., et al.: The global burden of cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol. 1(4), 505–527 (2015)
Edge, S., Compton, C.: The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 17(6), 1471–1474 (2010)
Singireddy, S., Alkhateeb, A., Rezaeian, I., Rueda, L., Cavallo-Medved, D., Porter, L.: Identifying differentially expressed transcripts associated with prostate cancer progression using RNA-Seq and machine learning techniques. In: 2015 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2015)
Gordetsky, J., Epstein, J.: Grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma: current state and prognostic implications. Diagn. Pathol. 11, 25 (2016)
Epstein, J., Zelefsky, M., Sjoberg, D., Nelson, J., Egevad, L., Magi-Galluzzi, C., et al.: A contemporary prostate cancer grading system: a validated alternative to the Gleason score. Eur. Urol. 69(3), 428–435 (2016)
Lexander, H., Palmberg, C., Hellman, U., Auer, G., Hellström, M., Franzén, B., Jörnvall, H., Egevad, L.: Correlation of protein expression, gleason score and DNA ploidy in prostate cancer. Proteomics 6(15), 4370–4380 (2006)
Trapnell, C., Hendrickson, D., Sauvageau, M., Goff, L., Rinn, J., Pachter, L.: Differential analysis of gene regulation at transcript resolution with RNA-seq. Nat. Biotechnol. 31(1), 46–53 (2013). ISBN 0716776014
Trapnell, C., Williams, B., Pertea, G., Mortazavi, A., Kwan, G., van Baren, M.J., et al.: Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat. Biotechnol. 28(5), 5115 (2010). doi:10.1038/nbt.1621
Mortazavi, A., Williams, B., McCue, K., Schaeffer, L., Wold, B.: Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat. Meth. 5(7), 6218 (2008). doi:10.1038/nmeth.1226
Altschul, S., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E., Lipman, D.: Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215(3), 403–410 (1990)
Trapnell, C., Pachter, L., Salzberg, S.: TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 25(9), 1105–1111 (2009)
Dobin, A., Davis, C., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M., Gingeras, T.: STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29(1), 15–21 (2013)
Citak-Er, F., Vural, M., Acar, O., Esen, T., Onay, A., Ozturk-Isik, E.: Final Gleason score prediction using discriminant analysis and support vector machine based on preoperative multiparametric MR imaging of prostate cancer at 3T. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 690787 (2014)
Wei, P., Qiao, B., Li, Q., Han, X., Zhang, H., Huo, Q., Sun, J.: microRNA-340 suppresses tumorigenic potential of prostate cancer cells by targeting high-mobility group nucleosome-binding domain 5. DNA Cell Biol. 35(1), 33–43 (2016)
Li, B., Dewey, C.: RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinform. 12(1), 1 (2011)
Novakovic, J.: Using information gain attribute evaluation to classify sonar targets. In: 17th Telecommunications forum TELFOR, pp. 24–26 (2009)
Peng, H., Long, F., Ding, C.: Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intel. 27(8), 1226–1238 (2005)
Frank, E., Hall, M., Witten, I.: The WEKA Workbench. In: Online Appendix for “Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques”, 4th edn. Morgan Kaufman, Burlington (2016)
Domingos, P., Pazzani, M.: On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss. Mach. Learn. 29(2–3), 103–130 (1997)
Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20(3), 273–297 (1995)
Gross, M., Liu, B., Tan, J., French, F., Carey, M., Shuai, K.: Distinct effects of PIAS proteins on androgen-mediated gene activation in prostate cancer cells. Oncogene 20(29), 3880 (2001)
Izumi, K., Fang, L., Mizokami, A., Namiki, M., Li, L., Lin, W., Chang, C.: Targeting the androgen receptor with siRNA promotes prostate cancer metastasis through enhanced macrophage recruitment via CCL2/CCR2-induced STAT3 activation. EMBO Mol. Med. 5(9), 1383–1401 (2013)
Zhang, Q., Raghunath, P., Xue, L., Majewski, M., Carpentieri, D., Odum, N., Morris, S., Skorski, T., Wasik, M.: Multilevel dysregulation of STAT3 activation in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive T/null-cell lymphoma. J. Immunol. 168(1), 466–474 (2002)
Ogata, Y., Osaki, T., Naka, T., Iwahori, K., Furukawa, M., Nagatomo, I., Kijima, T., Kumagai, T., Yoshida, M., Tachibana, I., et al.: Overexpression of PIAS3 suppresses cell growth, restores the drug sensitivity of human lung cancer cells in association with PI3-K/Akt inactivation. Neoplasia 8(10), 817–825 (2006)
Nicolas, E., Arora, S., Zhou, Y., Serebriiskii, I., Andrake, M., Handorf, E., Bodian, D., Vockley, J., Dunbrack, R., Ross, E., et al.: Systematic evaluation of underlying defects in DNA repair as an approach to case-only assessment of familial prostate cancer. Oncotarget 6(37), 39614 (2015)
Santarpia, L., Iwamoto, T., Di Leo, A., Hayashi, N., Bottai, G., Stampfer, M., André, F., Turner, F., Symmans, W., Hortobágyi, G., et al.: DNA repair gene patterns as prognostic and predictive factors in molecular breast cancer subtypes. Oncologist 18(10), 1063–1073 (2013)
Schulz, W., Ingenwerth, M., Djuidje, C., Hader, C., Rahnenführer, J., Engers, R.: Changes in cortical cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix gene expression in prostate cancer are related to oncogenic ERG deregulation. BMC Cancer 10(1), 505 (2010)
Ji, Z., Shi, X., Liu, X., Shi, Y., Zhou, Q., Liu, X., Li, L., Ji, X., Gao, Y., Qi, Y., et al.: The membrane-cytoskeletal protein 4.1N is involved in the process of cell adhesion, migration and invasion of breast cancer cells. Exp. Ther. Med. 4(4), 736–740 (2012)
Seabra, A., Araújo, T., Mello, F., Alcântara, D., De Barros, D., Assumpção, D.E., Montenegro, R., Guimares, A., Demachki, S., Burbano, R.: High-density array comparative genomic hybridization detects novel copy number alterations in gastric adenocarcinoma. Anticancer Res. 34(11), 6405–6415 (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hamzeh, O., Alkhateeb, A., Rezaeian, I., Karkar, A., Rueda, L. (2017). Finding Transcripts Associated with Prostate Cancer Gleason Stages Using Next Generation Sequencing and Machine Learning Techniques. In: Rojas, I., Ortuño, F. (eds) Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering. IWBBIO 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10209. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56154-7_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56154-7_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56153-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56154-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)