Abstract
Robotic prosthetic hands with five digits have become commercially available however their use is limited to a few grip patterns due to the unnatural and unreliable human-machine interface (HMI). The research community has addressed this problem extensively by investigating Pattern Recognition (PR) based surface-electromyography (sEMG) control. This control strategy has been recently commercialized however has yet to show clinical adoption. One of the reasons identified in the literature is due to the sEMG signals that are affected by sweating, electrode shift, ambient noise, fatigue, cross-talk between adjacent muscles, signal drifting, and force level variation. Hence recently the scientific community has started proposing multi-modal sensing techniques as a solution.
This study aims to investigate the use of multi-modal sensor approach to control a robotic prosthetic hand by investigating the sparsely studied sensing mechanism called Force Myography (FMG) as a synergist to the conventional technique of sEMG. FMG uses pressure sensors on the surface of a limb to detect the volumetric changes in the underlying musculotendinous complex. This paper presents a custom prosthetic prototype instrumented with sEMG and FMG sensors and tested by a participant with a transradial amputation. Results demonstrate that this multi-sensor approach has the potential to be a valid HMI for prosthesis control.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Al-Timemy, A., Khushaba, R., Bugmann, G., Escudero, J.: Improving the performance against force variation of EMG controlled multifunctional upper-limb prostheses for transradial amputees. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 24, 650–661 (2015). doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2445634
Amft, O., Junker, H., Lukowicz, P., Tröster, G., Schuster, C.: Sensing muscle activities with body-worn sensors. In: Proceedings - BSN 2006: International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, vol. 2006, pp. 138–141. IEEE, Cambridge (2006). http://doi.org/10.1109/BSN.2006.48
Amsuss, S., Goebel, P.M., Jiang, N., Graimann, B., Paredes, L., Farina, D.: Self-correcting pattern recognition system of surface EMG signals for upper limb prosthesis control. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 61(4), 1167–1176 (2014). doi:10.1109/TBME.2013.2296274
Atzori, M., Gijsberts, A., Castellini, C., Caputo, B., Hager, A.-G.M., Elsig, S., Müller, H.: Electromyography data for non-invasive naturally-controlled robotic hand prostheses. Sci. Data 1, 140053 (2014). doi:10.1038/sdata.2014.53
Atzori, M., Müller, H.: Control capabilities of myoelectric robotic prostheses by hand amputees: a scientific research and market overview. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 9, 162 (2015). http://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00162
Biddiss, E.A., Chau, T.T.: Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 31(3), 236–257 (2007). doi:10.1080/03093640600994581
Castellini, C., Artemiadis, P., Wininger, M., Ajoudani, A., Alimusaj, M., Bicchi, A., Scheme, E.: Proceedings of the first workshop on peripheral machine interfaces: going beyond traditional surface electromyography. Front. Neurorobot. 8(AUG), Article no. 22(2014). http://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2014.00022
Cho, E., Chen, R., Merhi, L., Xiao, Z., Pousett, B., Menon, C.: Force myography to control robotic upper extremity prostheses: a feasibility study. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 4(March), 1–12 (2016). doi:10.3389/fbioe.2016.00018
Fang, Y., Hettiarachchi, N., Zhou, D., Liu, H.: Multi-modal sensing techniques for interfacing hand prostheses: a review. IEEE Sens. J. 15(11), 6065–6076 (2015). doi:10.1109/JSEN.2015.2450211
Li, N., Yang, D., Jiang, L., Liu, H., Cai, H.: Combined use of FSR sensor array and SVM classifier for finger motion recognition based on pressure distribution map. J. Bionic Eng. 9(1), 39–47 (2012). doi:10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60095-4
Merletti, R., Aventaggiato, M., Botter, A., Holobar, A., Marateb, H., Vieira, T.M.M.: Advances in surface EMG: recent progress in detection and processing techniques. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 38(4), 305–345 (2010). doi:10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v38.i4.10
Peerdeman, B., Boere, D., Witteveen, H., Huis in’t Veld, R., Hermens, H., Stramigioli, S., Misra, S.: Myoelectric forearm prostheses: state of the art from a user-centered perspective. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 48(6), 719 (2011). doi:10.1682/JRRD.2010.08.0161
Phillips, S.L., Craelius, W.: Residual kinetic imaging: a versatile interface for prosthetic control. Robotica 23(3), 277–282 (2005). doi:10.1017/S0263574704001298
Radmand, A., Scheme, E., Englehard, K.: High resolution muscle pressure mapping for upper limb prosthetic control. In: Proceeding of MEC - Myoelectric Control Symposium, 19–22 August, pp. 189–193 (2014a)
Rasouli, M., Ghosh, R., Lee, W.W., Thakor, N.V, Kukreja, S.: Stable force-myographic control of a prosthetic hand using incremental learning. In: 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 4828–4831. IEEE (2015). http://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319474
Ravindra, V., Castellini, C.: A comparative analysis of three non-invasive human-machine interfaces for the disabled. Front. Neurorobot. 8(October), 1–10 (2014). doi:10.3389/fnbot.2014.00024
Scheme, E., Englehart, K.: Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 48(6), 643 (2011). doi:10.1682/JRRD.2010.09.0177
Scheme, E.J., Hudgins, B.S., Englehart, K.B.: Confidence-based rejection for improved pattern recognition myoelectric control. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 60(6), 1563–1570 (2013). doi:10.1109/TBME.2013.2238939
Wininger, M., Kim, N.-H., Craelius, W.: Pressure signature of forearm as predictor of grip force. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 45(6), 883–892 (2008). doi:10.1682/JRRD.2007.11.0187
Wirta, R.W., Taylor, D.R., Wirta, R.W., Wirta, R.W., Finley, F.R.: Pattern-recognition arm prothesis: a historical perspective—a final report. Nonr 4292, 1–28 (1963)
Xiong, Y., Quek, F.: Hand motion gesture frequency properties and multimodal discourse analysis. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 69(3), 353–371 (2006)
Yang, D., Jiang, L., Huang, Q., Liu, R., Liu, H.: Experimental study of an EMG-controlled 5-DOF anthropomorphic prosthetic hand for motion restoration. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 76(3–4), 427–441 (2014). doi:10.1007/s10846-014-0037-6
Zhang, H., Zhao, Y., Yao, F., Xu, L., Shang, P., Li, G.: An adaptation strategy of using LDA classifier for EMG pattern recognition. In: Conference Proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference, vol. 2013, pp. 4267–4270. IEEE (2013). http://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610488
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ghataurah, J., Ferigo, D., Merhi, LK., Pousett, B., Menon, C. (2017). A Multi-sensor Approach for Biomimetic Control of a Robotic Prosthetic Hand. In: Rojas, I., Ortuño, F. (eds) Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering. IWBBIO 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10208. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56148-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56148-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56147-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56148-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)