Abstract
Numerous studies aiming at testing the relationship between back pain occurrence during pregnancy and demographics, such as parity, age and total body mass, have found conflicting evidence for parity and age, and weak evidence for the total body mass. The aim of this study was to test the possible relationship between anthropometric biomechanical parameters and disability during pregnancy. Anthropometric data were gathered using a stereophotogrammetric method described by Jensen. Data of interest were trunk mass and moments of inertia. The influences of total body mass, age and weight gain on level of disability were also investigated. The latter was quantified using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and painful regions were recorded on a pain drawing. Data were collected at mid- and late-pregnancy, 20 and 34 weeks respectively. Correlations between ODI and other parameters were assessed using the Spearman correlation for ranked data. This test was first performed on the whole mid-pregnancy and late pregnancy samples regardless of pain site. Correlation coefficients were then computed again for sub-samples stemming from the pain drawing data. A positive relationship was found between anthropometric parameters and ODI in the small mid-pregnancy sample, and a negative one has been found in the late pregnancy sample. More specific results appeared for the sub-samples with respect to pain regions. A strong relationship was observed between biomechanical parameters and ODI in the mid-pregnancy low back pain sub-sample. The upper back pain mid-pregnancy sub-sample showed no correlations and the sacroiliac pain group presented rather weak or no relationship with disability. Our findings suggest different etiologies for different kinds of back pain and underline the influence of anthropometric parameters in low back pain observed in pregnancy. Pregnant women suffering from low back pain should be advised to be aware of and control their weight gain as it may have a relationship to lower back pain symptoms. Samples studied here were rather small and further investigation is required to confirm these findings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berg, G., Hammar, M., Möller-Nielsen, J., Lindén, U., Thorblad, J.: Low back pain during pregnancy. Obstet. Gynaecol. 71, 71–75 (1988)
Fast, A., Weiss, L., Ducommun, E.J., Medina, E., Butler, J.G.: Low back pain in pregnancy abdominal muscles, sit-up performance, and back pain. Spine 15, 28–30 (1990)
Mantle, M.J., Greenwood, R.M., Currey, H.L.F.: Backache in pregnancy. Rheumatol. Rehabil. 16, 95–101 (1977)
Östgaard, H.C., Zetherström, G., Roos-Hansson, E., Svanberg, B.: Reduction of back and posterior pelvic pain in pregnancy. Spine 19, 894–900 (1994)
Wu, W.H., Meijer, O.G., Uegaki, K., Mens, J.M.A., van Dieën, J.H., Wuisman, P.I.J.M., Östgaard, H.C.: Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence. Eur. Spine J. 13, 575–589 (2004)
Bastiaanssen, J.M., de Bie, R.A., Bastiaenen, C.H.G., Essed, G.G.M., van den Brandt, P.A.: A historical perspective on pregnancy-related low back and/or pelvic girdle pain. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Reprod. Biol. 120, 3–14 (2005)
Timsit, M.-A.: Pregnancy, low-back pain and pelvic girdle pain. Gynécol. Obstet. Fertil. 32, 420–426 (2004). (abstract in English)
Brynhildsen, J., Hansson, Å., Persson, A., Hammar, M.: Follow-up of patients with low back pain during pregnancy. Obstet. Gynaecol. 91, 182–186 (1998)
Östgaard, H.C., Andersson, G.B.J., Schultz, A.B., Miller, J.A.A.: Influence of some biomechanical factors on low-back pain in pregnancy. Spine 18, 61–65 (1993)
Marnach, M.L., Ramin, K.D., Ramsey, P.S., Song, S.-W., Stensland, J.J., An, K.-N.: Characterization of the relationship between joint laxity and maternal hormones in pregnancy. Obstet. Gynaecol. 101, 331–335 (2003)
Fast, A., Shapiro, D., Ducommun, E.J., Friedmann, L.W., Bouklas, T., Floman, Y.: Low-back pain in pregnancy. Spine 12, 368–371 (1987)
Kristiansson, P., Svärdsudd, K., von Schoultz, B.: Reproductive hormones and aminoterminal propeptide of type III procollagen in serum as early markers of pelvic pain during late pregnancy. Am. J. Obstr. Gynecol. 180, 128–134 (1999)
Östgaard, H.C., Andersson, G.B.J., Karlsson, K.: Prevalence of back pain in pregnancy. Spine 16, 549–552 (1991)
Wang, S.-M., Dezinno, P., Maranets, I., Berman, M.R., Caldwell-Andrews, A.A., Kain, Z.N.: Low back pain during pregnancy: prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes. Obstet. Gynecol. 104, 65–70 (2004)
Damen, L.H., Buyruk, M., Güler-Uysal, F., Lotgering, F.K., Snijders, C.J., Stam, H.J.: Pelvic pain during pregnancy is associated with asymmetric laxity of the sacroiliac joints. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 80, 1019–1024 (2001)
Kristiansson, P., Svärdsudd, K., von Schoultz, B.: Back pain during pregnancy. Spine 21, 702–709 (1996)
Orvieto, R., Achiron, A., Ben-Rafael, Z., Gelernter, I., Achiron, R.: Low-back pain of pregnancy. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 73, 209–214 (1994)
Björklund, K., Naessén, T., Nordström, M.L., Bergström, S.: Pregnancy-related back and pelvic pain and changes in bone density. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 78, 681–685 (1999)
Culver, C.C., Viano, D.C.: Anthropometry of seated women during pregnancy: defining a fetal region for crash protection research. Hum. Factors 32, 625–636 (1990)
Jensen, R.K., Doucet, S., Treitz, T.: Changes in segment mass and mass distribution during pregnancy. J. Biomech. 29, 251–256 (1996)
Jensen, R.K., Treitz, T., Doucet, S.: Prediction of human segment inertias during pregnancy. J. Appl. Biomech. 12, 15–30 (1996)
Cheng, P.L., Dumas, G.A., Smith, J.T., Leger, A., Plamondon, A., McGrath, M.J., Tranmer, J.E.: Analysis of self reported problematic tasks for pregnant women, submitted to Ergonomics (2003)
Jensen, R.K.: Estimation of the biomechanical properties of three body types using a photogrammetric method. J. Biomech. 11, 349–358 (1978)
Jensen, R.K., Fletcher, P.: Body segment moments of inertia of the elderly. J. Appl. Biomech. 9, 287–305 (1993)
Dempster, W.T.: Space requirements of the seated operator. WADC Technical report, 55–159, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH (1955)
Clauser, C.E., McConville, J.T., Young, J.W.: Weight, volume and center of mass of segments of the human body. AMRL Technical report 69–70. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH (1969)
Sturesson, B., Udén, G., Udén, A.: Pain pattern in pregnancy and “catching” of the leg in pregnant women with posterior pelvic pain. Spine 22, 1880–1884 (1997)
To, W.W.K., Wong, M.W.N.: Factors associated with back pain symptoms in pregnancy and the persistence of pain 2 years after pregnancy. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 82, 1086–1091 (2003)
Fairbank, J.C.T., Couper, J., Davies, J.B., O’Brien, J.P.: The Oswestry low back pain dissability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66, 271–273 (1980)
Garshasbi, A., Faghih Zadeh, S.: The effect of exercise on the intensity of low back pain in pregnant women. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 88, 271–275 (2005)
Dumas, G.A., Reid, J.G., Wolfe, L.A., Griffin, M.P., McGrath, M.J.: Exercise, posture, and back pain during pregnancy (part 2. Exercise and back pain). Clin. Biomech. 10, 98–103 (1995)
Padua, L., Padua, R., Bondì, R., Ceccarelli, E., Caliandro, P., D’Amico, P., Mazza, O., Tonali, P.: Patient-oriented assessment of back pain in pregnancy. Eur. Spine J. 11(3), 272–275 (2002)
Sihvonen, T., Huttunen, M., Makkonen, M., Airaksinen, O.: Functional changes in back muscle activity correlate with pain intensity and prediction of low back pain during pregnancy. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 79, 1210–1212 (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Leboucher, J.A., Pinti, A., Dumas, G.A. (2017). Back Pain During Pregnancy and Its Relationship to Anthropometric Biomechanical Parameters. In: Rojas, I., Ortuño, F. (eds) Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering. IWBBIO 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10208. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56148-6_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56148-6_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56147-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56148-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)