Skip to main content

On Models and Modeling in Measurement and Validation Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding and Investigating Response Processes in Validation Research

Part of the book series: Social Indicators Research Series ((SINS,volume 69))

Abstract

This chapter focuses on a description of models and modeling practices in test validation and measurement in a broad sense. The varieties of models and modeling activities are described from a vantage point and lens of philosophy of science, logic, mathematics, and psychology. The chapter closes with a description and critical analysis of model choice and modeling practices with an emphasis on models and assumptions as empirical commitments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (AERA, APA, NCME). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H., & Wood, R. (1989). Five decades of item response modeling. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42, 139–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulliksen, H. (1950). Theory of mental tests. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. W. (1990a). On the sampling theory foundations of item response theory models. Psychometrika, 55, 577–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. W. (1990b). The Dutch Identity: A new tool for the study of item response models. Psychometrika, 55, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubley, A. M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2013). Psychometric characteristics of assessment procedures: An overview. In K. F. Geisinger (Ed.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 3–19). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, E. L. (1993). The Fisher, Neyman-Pearson theories of testing hypotheses: One theory or two? Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 1242–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick, M. R. (1966). The axioms and principal results of classical test theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 3, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozeboom, W. W. (1966). Foundations of the theory of prediction. Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1932). The reliability and validity of tests. Ann Arbor, MI: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. W., Williams, R. H., Zumbo, B. D., & Ross, D. (2005). Louis Guttman’s contributions to classical test theory. International Journal of Testing, 5, 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. W., & Zumbo, B. D. (2001). The geometry of probability, statistics, and test theory. International Journal of Testing, 1, 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Validity: Foundational issues and statistical methodology. In C. R. Rao & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics, Vol. 26: Psychometrics (pp. 45–79). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumbo, B. D. (2009). Validity as contextualized and pragmatic explanation, and its implications for validation practice. In R. W. Lissitz (Ed.), The concept of validity: Revisions, new directions and applications (pp. 65–82). Charlotte, NC: IAP – Information Age Publishing, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumbo, B. D., & Kroc, E. (2016). Some remarks on Rao and Lovric’s testing the point null hypothesis of a normal mean and the truth: 21st century perspective. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 15, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zumbo, B. D., & MacMillan, P. O. (1999). An overview and some observations on the psychometric models used in computer-adaptive language testing. In M. Chalhoub-Deville (Ed.), Issues in computer-adaptive testing of reading proficiency (pp. 216–228). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumbo, B. D., & Rupp, A. A. (2004). Responsible modeling of measurement data for appropriate inferences: important advances in reliability and validity theory. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 73–92). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno D. Zumbo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zumbo, B.D. (2017). On Models and Modeling in Measurement and Validation Studies. In: Zumbo, B., Hubley, A. (eds) Understanding and Investigating Response Processes in Validation Research. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 69. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56129-5_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56129-5_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56128-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56129-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics