Skip to main content

Guidelines for the Delineation of Lymphatic Target Volumes in Prostate Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Principles and Practice of Urooncology

Abstract

The incidence of regional lymph node (LN) involvement in patients with prostate cancer depends on several factors like the tumor size and the Gleason score (GS). The risk of LN involvement is <10% in low-risk disease. A number of models were developed in order to predict the risk of LN involvement which helps the physicians to decide whether to perform a staging lymphadenectomy or LN irradiation. In this chapter, we will review the current guidelines for the delineation of lymphatic target volumes in prostate cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fowler JE Jr, Whitmore WF Jr. The incidence and extent of pelvic lymph node metastases in apparently localized prostatic cancer. Cancer. 1981;47(12):2941–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pisansky TM, Zincke H, Suman VJ, Bostwick DG, Earle JD, Oesterling JE. Correlation of pretherapy prostate cancer characteristics with histologic findings from pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;34(1):33–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Partin AW, Yoo J, Carter HB, Pearson JD, Chan DW, Epstein JI, et al. The use of prostate specific antigen, clinical stage and Gleason score to predict pathological stage in men with localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 1993;150(1):110–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bishoff JT, Reyes A, Thompson IM, Harris MJ, St Clair SR, Gomella L, et al. Pelvic lymphadenectomy can be omitted in selected patients with carcinoma of the prostate: development of a system of patient selection. Urology. 1995;45(2):270–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Link RE, Morton RA. Indications for pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer. Urol Clin North Am. 2001;28(3):491–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stock RG, Stone NN, Ianuzzi C, Unger P. Seminal vesicle biopsy and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection: implications for patient selection in the radiotherapeutic management of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;33(4):815–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rees MA, Campbell S, Kleian EA, et al. Validation of a model for predicting metastatic disease in the pelvic lymph nodes of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 1996;155:487. (abst).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roach M. Equations for predicting the pathologic state of men with localized prostate cancer using the preoperative prostate specific antigen. J Urol. 1993;150:1923–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gervasi LA, Mata J, Easley JD, Wilbanks JH, Seale-Hawkins C, Carlton CE Jr, et al. Prognostic significance of lymph nodal metastases in prostate cancer. J Urol. 1989;142(2 Pt 1):332–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng L, Zincke H, Blute ML, Bergstralh EJ, Scherer B, Bostwick DG. Risk of prostate carcinoma death in patients with lymph node metastasis. Cancer. 2001;91(1):66–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Prout GR Jr, Heaney JA, Griffin PP, Daly JJ, Shipley WU. Nodal involvement as a prognostic indicator in patients with prostatic carcinoma. J Urol. 1980;124(2):226–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Golimbu M, Provet J, Al-Askari S, Morales P. Radical prostatectomy for stage D1 prostate cancer. Prognostic variables and results of treatment. Urology. 1987;30(5):427–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. UICC. TNM supplement. 3rd ed. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dirix P, Haustermans K, Junius S, Withers R, Oyen R, Van Poppel H. The role of whole pelvic radiotherapy in locally advanced prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2006;79(1):1–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Asbell SO, Martz KL, Shin KH, Sause WT, Doggett RL, Perez CA, et al. Impact of surgical staging in evaluating the radiotherapeutic outcome in RTOG #77-06, a phase III study for T1BN0M0 (A2) and T2N0M0 (B) prostate carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;40(4):769–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roach M 3rd, DeSilvio M, Lawton C, Uhl V, Machtay M, Seider MJ, et al. Phase III trial comparing whole-pelvic versus prostate-only radiotherapy and neoadjuvant versus adjuvant combined androgen suppression: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(10):1904–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roach M, Yan Y, Lawton CA, Hsu IJ, Lustig RA, Jones CU, et al. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9413: randomized trial comparing whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) to prostate only (PORT) and neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) to adjuvant hormone therapy (AHT). J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(suppl 5):96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pommier P, Chabaud S, Lagrange JL, Richaud P, Lesaunier F, Le Prise E, et al. Is there a role for pelvic irradiation in localized prostate adenocarcinoma? Preliminary results of GETUG-01. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(34):5366–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pommier P, Chabaud S, Lagrange JL, Richaud P, Le Prise E, Wagner JP, et al. Is there a role for pelvic irradiation in localized prostate adenocarcinoma? Update of the long-term survival results of the GETUG-01 randomized study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96(4):759–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Murthy V, Lewis S, Sawant M, Paul SN, Mahantshetty U, Shrivastava SK. Incidental dose to pelvic nodal regions in prostate-only radiotherapy. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2017;16(2):211–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Saksena MA, Kim JY, Harisinghani MG. Nodal staging in genitourinary cancers. Abdom Imaging. 2006;31(6):644–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Koh DM, Hughes M, Husband JE. Cross-sectional imaging of nodal metastases in the abdomen and pelvis. Abdom Imaging. 2006;31(6):632–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chapet O, Enachescu C, Lorchel F. Pelvic irradiation in prostate cancer: what place for what volumes? Cancer Radiother. 2013;17(5–6):562–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Padhani AR. Lymph Nodes. In: Nicholson T, editor. Recommendations for cross-sectional imaging in cancer management. London: The Royal College of Radiologists; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lawton CA, Michalski J, El-Naqa I, Buyyounouski MK, Lee WR, Menard C, et al. RTOG GU radiation oncology specialists reach consensus on pelvic lymph node volumes for high-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;74(2):383–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Meijer HJ, Fortuin AS, van Lin EN, Debats OA, Alfred Witjes J, Kaanders JH, et al. Geographical distribution of lymph node metastases on MR lymphography in prostate cancer patients. Radiother Oncol. 2013;106(1):59–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Spratt DE, Vargas HA, Zumsteg ZS, Golia Pernicka JS, Osborne JR, Pei X, et al. Patterns of lymph node failure after dose-escalated radiotherapy: implications for extended pelvic lymph node coverage. Eur Urol. 2017;71(1):37–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shih HA, Harisinghani M, Zietman AL, Wolfgang JA, Saksena M, Weissleder R. Mapping of nodal disease in locally advanced prostate cancer: rethinking the clinical target volume for pelvic nodal irradiation based on vascular rather than bony anatomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63(4):1262–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pervin Hurmuz M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ozyigit, G., Yazici, G., Sari, S.Y., Gultekin, M., Hurmuz, P., Akyol, F. (2017). Guidelines for the Delineation of Lymphatic Target Volumes in Prostate Cancer. In: Ozyigit, G., Selek, U. (eds) Principles and Practice of Urooncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56114-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56114-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56113-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56114-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics