Abstract
Military doctrine assumes information and information technology to be a key factor in decisions at all levels of war. It suggests that one should expect military operations to go hand in hand with second mover advantages. The analyses presented in this thesis suggest, though, that the general assumption that every strategy anticipating the enemy’s intentions would necessarily result in an advantage is not justified. What is more, we even find examples in actual conflicts, where there is an incentive to do the opposite, namely reveal one’s strategies to the enemy. Scenarios from Operation Enduring Freedom, e.g., show that, contrary to intuition, COIN forces’ operations would have been able to do better by revealing their CAS capabilities in advance of every operation to take place, and not going ahead with that particular operation in the first place, unless they possess sufficient capabilities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Randolph, S. P. (2015). Strategic decision making and competitive advantage: America vs. north Vietnam in linebackers I and II. Paper presented at the Violent Skies Symposium, October 15–16, 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ordóñez, L.M. (2017). Lessons Learned. In: Military Operational Planning and Strategic Moves. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56108-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56108-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56107-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56108-0
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)