Advertisement

Irregular Warfare

  • Lucía Martínez Ordóñez
Chapter
  • 645 Downloads
Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)

Abstract

War understood as two armies fighting against each other has become an obsolete concept. During the last few decades we have been observing conflicts of a different nature, not only because the actors involved are no longer legitimized by states, but also because of the unconventional strategies utilized in particular on the side of the non-state actor. Since 1975, the Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP) has been recording data from global armed conflicts confirming the increasing trend of non-state conflicts.

Keywords

Military Operation Military Expenditure Marine Corps Irregular Warfare Military Budget 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alexander, J. H. (2012). Close air support: The pioneering years. http://www.usni.org/magazines/navalhistory/2012-11/close-air-support-pioneering-years. Last accessed 10 Oct 2015.
  2. Archick, K., Belkin, P., Blanchard, C. M., Humud, C. E., & Mix, D. E. (2015). European fighters in Syria and Iraq: Assessments, responses, and issues for the United States. Retrieved from Congressional Research Service: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R44003.pdf. Last accessed 18 Oct 2015.
  3. Arreguín-Toft, I. (2001). How the weak win wars. A theory of asymmetric conflict. International Security, 26(1), 93–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BBC news (2012). Syria conflict: Damascus suburb sees heavy fighting. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-19645269. Last accessed 18 Oct 2015.
  5. Belasco, A. (2015). Defense spending and the budget control act limits. Retrieved from Congressional Research Service: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R44039.pdf. Last accessed 18 Oct 2015.
  6. Betts, R. K. (2002). The soft underbelly of american primacy: Tactical advantages of terror. Political Science Quarterly, 117, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, C., & Gates, S. (2010). The technology of terror: Accounting for the strategic use of terrorism. Economics of Security, Working Paper 30, pp. 10–24.Google Scholar
  8. von Clausewitz, C. (1976). On war. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Transls. M. Howard, P. Paret.Google Scholar
  9. Department of Defense (2007). Irregular warfare (iw) joint operating concept (joc), version 1.0. http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/concepts/joint_concepts/joc_iw_v1.pdf. Last accessed 16 Oct 2015.
  10. Department of Peace and Conflict Research (2015). Website: Definitions. http://www.pcr.uu.se/research/ucdp/definitions/. Last accessed 18 Oct 2015.
  11. European Defence Agency (2013). Defence data of eda in 2013. https://www.eda.europa.eu/info-hub/defence-data-portal/EDA/year/2013. Last accessed 18 Oct 2015.
  12. European Defence Agency (2015). Defence data 2013. https://www.eda.europa.eu/info-hub/press-centre/latest-news/2015/03/31/latest-defence-data-published. Last accessed 18 Oct 2015.
  13. Harmon, C. C. (2010). How terrorist groups end. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 4(3), 43–84.Google Scholar
  14. Hoffman, F. G. (2007). Conflict in the 21st century: The rise of hybrid wars. Arlington: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  15. Hurley, W., Bucher, C. R., Numrich, S., Ouellette, S. M., & Resnick, J. B. (2009). Non-kinetic capabilities for irregular warfare: Four case studies, P-4436. Institute for Defense Analysis. IDA Paper P-4436.Google Scholar
  16. Hurley, W. J., Resnick, J. B., & Wahlman, A. (2007). Improving capabilities for irregular warfare. Framework and applications (Vol. I). Joint Advanced Warfighting Program. IDA Paper P-4267. Institute for Defense Analysis.Google Scholar
  17. Institute for Security Studies (2014). Euiss yearbook of European security 2014. http://www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/media/YES2014.pdf. Last accessed 18 Oct 2014.
  18. Joint Chiefs of Staff (2013). Joint publication 3-24. Counterinsurgency. http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/new_pubs/jp3_24.pdf. Last accessed 18 Oct 2015.
  19. Joint Chiefs of Staff (2015). Joint publication 1-02. Department of defense. Dictionary of military and associated term. http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/new_pubs/jp1_02.pdf. Last accessed 18 Oct 2015.
  20. Kaldor, M. (2007). New and old wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Katzenbach, E. L., J. (1962). Time, space and will: The politico-military views of Mao-tse-tung. In T. Greene (Ed.), The guerrilla and how to fight him (Selections from the marine corps gazette) (pp. 11–21). New York: Frederick A. Praeger.Google Scholar
  22. Kiras, J. D. (2007). Irregular warfare: Terrorism and insurgency. In J. Baylis, J. Wirtz, C. S. Gray, & E. Cohen (Eds.), Strategy in the contemporary world (pp. 163–191). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Krulak, C. (2000). Nes cras: Not like yesterday. In R. H. Shultz, & R. L. Pfaltzgraff (Eds.), The role of naval forces in the 21st century operations (pp. xi–xvii). Washington, D.C.: Brassesy’s.Google Scholar
  24. Larson, E. V., Eaton, D., Nichiporuk, B., T. S. Szayna, & R. Corporation (2008). Assessing irregular warfare. a framework for intelligence analysis. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2008/RAND_MG668.pdf. Last accessed 18 Oct 2015.
  25. MacGregor, D. (2009). Warrior’s rage: The great tank battle of 73 easting. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mack, A. J. R. (1975). Why big nations lose small wars: The politics of asymmetric conflict. World Politics, 27(2), 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Munkler, H. (2005). The new wars. Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Østby, G. (2008). Polarization, horizontal inequalities and violent civil conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 25(2), 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosen, S. (1972). War power and the willigness to suffer. In B. M. Russet (Ed.), Peace, war, and numbers (pp. 167–183). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Rosendorff, B. P., & T. Sandler (2005). Too much of a good thing? The proactive response dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48(5), 657–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shulimson, J., Blasiol, L. A., Smith, C. R., & Dawson, D. A. (1997). U.S. marines in Vietnam: The defining year, 1968. Washington, D.C.: History and Museums Division, Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps.Google Scholar
  32. Smith, R. (2007). The utility of force: The art of war in the modern age. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
  33. Stewart, F. (2000). Crisis prevention: Trackling horizontal inequalities. Oxford Development Studies, 23(3), 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. The New York Times (2002). A nation challenged: The economics; attacks may cost U.S. 1.8 million jobs. http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/13/us/a-nation-challenged-the-economics-attacks-may-cost-us-1.8-million-jobs.html. Last accessed 18 Oct 2015.
  35. Tse-Tung, M. (1937). On guerrilla warfare. New York: Praeger Publishers Inc. Transl. Samuel B. Griffith.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucía Martínez Ordóñez
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsRuhr University BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations