Advertisement

Conflicts as Zero-Sum Games

  • Lucía Martínez Ordóñez
Chapter
  • 641 Downloads
Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)

Abstract

Over the past decade, the term “asymmetric” has begun to convey two meanings within the military field. First, it has been used to refer to a special, i.e. “asymmetric”, kind of threat that countries are facing, and second, it describes the military conflicts resulting from these threats. It thereby refers to the nature of the conflict, and even though the sources of asymmetry in a conflict are varied, usually it is the asymmetry of force that is responsible for all others. On the other hand, though, it must not be used in a too narrow sense: as in real life any two opposing forces most likely command unequal defense budgets and/or are composed of different kinds of units, military conflicts could of course be described as being “asymmetric”, except that then examples for “symmetric” conflicts would at best be extremely rare indeed.

Keywords

Nash Equilibrium Mixed Strategy Pure Strategy Weak Actor Weak Force 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arreguín-Toft, I. (2001). How the weak win wars. A theory of asymmetric conflict. International Security, 26(1), 93–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blank, S. J. (2003). Rethinking asymmetric threats. Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute of the U.S. Army War College.Google Scholar
  3. Bradley, O. N. (1951). A Soldier’s story. New York: Henry Holt and Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Haywood, Jr. O. G. (1954). Military decision and game theory. Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 2(4), 365–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Herodotus (1926). The persian wars (Vol. IV. Books 8–9). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Transl. A. D. Godley.Google Scholar
  6. Mack, A. J. R. (1975). Why big nations lose small wars: The politics of asymmetric conflict. World Politics, 27(2), 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nutter, J. (1994). Unpacking threat: A conconcept and formal analysis. In N. A. Graham (Ed.), Seeking security and development: the impact of military spending and arms transfers (pp. 29–49). Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner Pub.Google Scholar
  8. Paul, T. (1994). Asymmetric conflicts: War initiation by weaker powers. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wagner, D. H., Mylander, W., & Sanders, T. J. (Eds.). (1999). Naval operations analysis. Annapolis: U.S. Naval Institute Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucía Martínez Ordóñez
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsRuhr University BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations