Skip to main content

Linguistic Qualification, Modification, and Synonymy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
On the Logos: A Naïve View on Ordinary Reasoning and Fuzzy Logic

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 354))

  • 447 Accesses

Abstract

Affirmative relational statements are often uttered in plain language, such as “The dark tower is spacious,” that, within a universe of towers, and with the words P = dark, and τ = spacious, can be represented by “The tower is P, and it is τ,” or, shortened by “The tower is P is τ.” In such statements, the information P facilitates the elements in the universe X, and is constrained by qualifying by τ. Representing such statements by “x is (P is τ)”, it is said that τ linguistically qualifies, or constrains, P in X, and it can be considered that (P is τ) is a new qualified or constrained predicative pair acting on the universe X, and perhaps renamed in it in some shortened but expressive form such as “This tower is dark and spacious.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. E. Trillas, On a model for the meaning of predicates, in Views on Fuzzy Sets and Systems from Different Perspectives, ed. by R. Seising (Springer, Berlin, 2009), pp. 175–205

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. E. Trillas, C. Moraga, A. Sobrino, On family resemblances with fuzzy sets, in Proceedings of IFSA-EUSFLAT (2009), pp. 306–311

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Lakoff, Hedges: A study on meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. J. Philos. Logic 2(4), 458–508 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. L.A. Zadeh, A fuzzy set theoretic interpretation of linguistic hedges. J. Cybernetics 2(3), 4–34 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. M. De Cock, E.E. Kerre, A context-based approach to linguistic hedges. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comp. Sci. 12(3), 371–382 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Pinker, Words and Rules (Basic Books, New York, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. E.E. Kerre, M. De Cock, Linguistic modifiers. An overview, in Fuzzy Logic and Soft Computing, ed. by E.E. Kerre et al. (Springer, New York, 1999), pp. 89–95

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. De Cock, E.E. Kerre, Fuzzy modifiers based on fuzzy relations. Inf. Sci. 160(1), 173–182 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enric Trillas .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trillas, E. (2017). Linguistic Qualification, Modification, and Synonymy. In: On the Logos: A Naïve View on Ordinary Reasoning and Fuzzy Logic. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 354. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56053-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56053-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56052-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56053-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics