Skip to main content

The Democratization Process in Mexico and Presidential Elections. Toward a Typology of Presidential Elections

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Presidential Elections in Mexico

Abstract

This chapter argues that democratization in Mexico occurred principally on account of internal political forces. This is to say, democratization in Mexico needs to be understood as a process of contention and mobilization in which the opposition, political parties, and other struggles have played a key role. While “contention” stresses the importance of political parties that pushed the governing elites into a democratic electoral process , “mobilization” emphasizes the struggles of workers, peasants , and student movements that confronted the authoritarian state, leading up to the formation of opposition political parties. I suggest that the democratization of Mexico is usefully approached as a political process enabled by opportunities that materialize in the competition that marks elections. Here, electoral results maintain or change political cleavages . Based on the work of V. O. Key and Gerald Pomper, the chapter develops a typology to classify presidential elections in Mexico.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bermeo, Nancy. 1990. Rethinking Regime Change. Comparative Politics 22 (3): 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bermeo, Nancy. 1997. Myths of Moderation: Confrontation and Conflict During Democratic Transitions. Comparative Politics 29 (3): 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bermeo, Nancy. 2003. Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times: The Citizenry and the Breakdown of Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, Michael, and Nicolas van de Walle. 1997. Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, Ruth Berins. 1999. Paths Toward Democracy: The Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert. 1971. Poliarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Tocqueville, Alexis. 1945. Democracy in America. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Tocqueville, Alexis. 1955. The Old Regime and the French Revolution. New York: Anchor Books-Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry. 1999. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, Barbara. 1999. What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years? Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Tagle, Silvia. 1997. La transición inconclusa, Treinta años de elecciones en México. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapalombara, Joseph, and Jeffrey Anderson. 1992. Political Parties. In Encyclopedia of Government and Politics, vol. I, ed. Mary Hawkesworth and Morice Kogan. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan J., and Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markoff, John. 1996. Waves of Democracy: Social Movements and Political Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, Robert T. 1963. British Political Parties, the Distribution of Power Within the Conservative and Labour Parties. London: Heinmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore Jr., Barrington. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’ Donnell, Guillermo, and Philippe C. Schmitter. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberschall, Anthony. 1973. Social Conflict and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, Adam. 1996. Studying Democratization: Twenty Years Later. New York: New York University, MIMEO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Evelyn Huber Stephens, and John D. Stephens. 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rustow, Dankwart. 1970. Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model. Comparative Politics 2 (3): 337–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni. 1990. The sociology of Parties: A Critical Review. In The West European Party System, ed. Peter Mair. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E.E. 1960. The Semisovereign People. Hinsdale, IL: Dyden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servín, Elisa. 2001. Ruptura y oposición. El movimiento henriquista, 1945–1954. México: Cal y Arena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shefter, Martin. 1994. Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skirius, John. 1978. José Vasconcelos y la cruzada de 1929. México: Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda. 1973. A Critical Review of Barrington Moore’s Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Politics and Society 4 (I): 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda (ed.). 1998. Democracy, Revolution and History. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, Georg. 1998. Democracy and Democratization: Processes and Prospect in a Changing World. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1993. European Revolutions, 1492–1992. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1995. The Emergence of Citizenship in France and Elsewhere. In Citizenship, Identity, and Social History, ed. Charles Tilly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1998. Durable Inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 2004. Contention & Democracy in Europe, 1650–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reynaldo Yunuen Ortega Ortiz .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ortega Ortiz, R.Y. (2017). The Democratization Process in Mexico and Presidential Elections. Toward a Typology of Presidential Elections. In: Presidential Elections in Mexico. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56032-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics