Attitudes Towards Paying for Environmental Protection in the Baltic Sea Region
This chapter compares public attitudes to environmental protection in Estonia with those in neighbouring Baltic states. Data from the Estonian Environmental Survey (The Chair of Environmental Economics. Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, 2010) and ISSP Environment III are compared and analysed using an ordered logit. Support for environmental protection is measured in the form of willingness of individuals to make financial sacrifices through higher prices and higher taxes or accepting a cut in their standard of living, in order to protect the environment. Results show that the demand for the protection of the environment tends to increase with income. There are some differences between public attitudes in terms of willingness to accept cuts in the standard of living and willingness to pay higher taxes and prices. Higher education is another determinant of support for environmental protection, particularly in Estonia.
KeywordsEnvironmental protection Public attitudes Estonia
- Ahtiainen, H., Artell, J., Czajkowski, M., Hasler, B., Hasselstrom, L., Huhtala, A., et al. (2014). Benefits of meeting nutrient reduction targets for the Baltic Sea a contingent valuation study in the nine coastal states. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3(3), 278–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Estonian Environmental Survey. (2010). The Chair of Environmental Economics. Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn. Data file 07.07.2010.Google Scholar
- Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Huhtala, A. (2009). The economics of the state of the Baltic Sea: Pre-study assessing the feasibility of a cost-benefit analysis of protecting the Baltic Sea ecosystem, Sektoritutkimuksen neuvottelukunta, Kestävä kehitys 2-2009.Google Scholar
- IMF. (2015). Table: Gross domestic product based on purchasing-power-parity (PPP) per capita GDP, from the World Economic Outlook Database October 2015.Google Scholar
- ISSP Research Group. (2012). International Social Survey Programme: Environment III—ISSP 2010. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5500 Data file Version 2.0.0. doi: 10.4232/1.11418.
- Inglehart, R. (1995). Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(1), 57–72.Google Scholar
- Naturvårdsverket. (2005). Kvalitetskriterier för ekonomiska miljövärderingsstudier. Stockholm: Naturvårdsverkets rapport.Google Scholar
- Pädam, S., & Ehrlich, Ü. (2011). Paying for environmental protection in Estonia in international comparison. In J. Sepp & D. Frear (Eds.), The economy and economics after crisis (pp. 197–209). Berlin: Berliner Wissenchafts-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Pouta, E. (2003). Attitude-behavior framework in contingent valuation of forest conservation. Ph.D. Dissertation. Helsinki: Department of Forest Economics Publication 12, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar