Amid a large set of tools available to perform a successful percutaneous coronary intervention, guidewires have received far less attention than guide catheters, stents, etc., although their key role during the procedure is at least as important. Guidewires may all look similar, but their internal structure varies widely and, as a consequence, their technical characteristics do show major differences. These various characteristics result from the different materials and internal structures of the different parts of the guidewire—i.e., the core, tip, body, cover, and coating—and so they affect guidewire performance. The selection of a particular guidewire is based on one or more specifications—such as flexibility, steerability, support, trackability, torquability, and tip load—needed to tackle the target lesion and the entire target vessel. In-depth knowledge of this information will help in choosing the most appropriate tool for any given lesion and so contribute to a successful procedure.
- 4.Lim ST, Koh TH. Guide catheters and wires. Percutaneous interventional cardiovascular medicine: the EAPCI textbook. Vol. II, 1. 2012. p. 3–34.Google Scholar
- 7.Galassi AR, Ganyukov V, Tomasello SD, Haes B, Leonid B. Successful antegrade revascularization by the innovation of composite core dual coil in a three-vessel total occlusive disease for cardiac arrest patient using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Bryson B. A short history of nearly everything. New York: Penguin Random House; 2003.Google Scholar
- 11.Barbato E, Colombo A, Heyndrickx GR. Interventional technology: rotational atherectomy. Percutaneous interventional cardiovascular medicine: the EAPCI textbook. Vol. II, 3–6. 2012. p. 195–211.Google Scholar
- 12.Tonino PAL, Sels J-W EM, Pils NHJ. Invasive physiological assessment of coronary disease. Percutaneous interventional cardiovascular medicine: the EAPCI textbook. Vol. I, 2–8. 2012. p. 505–28.Google Scholar