Skip to main content

Interventional Cerebral and Spinal Angiography

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 456 Accesses

Abstract

Interventional cerebral and spinal angiography play a key role in diagnosing and treating a wide variety of cerebral and spinal vascular diseases, including management of acute stroke, cerebral aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations and fistulas, vascular trauma, tumors, and many other cerebral and spinal vascular disorders. Deep understanding of cerebral and spinal vascular anatomy and pathology, mastering the surgical technique, careful preoperative preparation, meticulous postoperative care, and managing potential complications are all crucial to achieve good outcomes. This chapter focuses on the basic steps involved in performing a safe, efficient, and successful cerebral and spinal angiography examination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahn SH, Prince EA, Dubel GJ. Basic neuroangiography: review of technique and perioperative patient care. Semin Interv Radiol. 2013;30(3):225–33. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1353474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee DH, Ahn JH, Jeong SS, Eo KS, Park MS. Routine transradial access for conventional cerebral angiography: a single operator’s experience of its feasibility and safety. Br J Radiol. 2004;77(922):831–8. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/89933527.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Levy EI, Boulos AS, Fessler RD, Bendok BR, Ringer AJ, Kim SH, Qureshi AI, Guterman LR, Hopkins LN. Transradial cerebral angiography: an alternative route. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(2):335–40; discussion 340–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nohara AM, Kallmes DF. Transradial cerebral angiography: technique and outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24(6):1247–50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Layton KF, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ, Lindell EP, Cox VS. Bovine aortic arch variant in humans: clarification of a common misnomer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27(7):1541–2.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hong JM, Chung CS, Bang OY, Yong SW, Joo IS, Huh K. Vertebral artery dominance contributes to basilar artery curvature and peri-vertebrobasilar junctional infarcts. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80(10):1087–92. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2008.169805.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi IS, Berenstein A. Surgical neuroangiography of the spine and spinal cord. Radiol Clin N Am. 1988;26(5):1131–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gillilan LA. The arterial blood supply of the human spinal cord. J Comp Neurol. 1958;110(1):75–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nelson PK, Setton A, Berenstein A. Vertebrospinal angiography in the evaluation of vertebral and spinal cord disease. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 1996;6(3):589–605.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shimizu S, Tanaka R, Kan S, Suzuki S, Kurata A, Fujii K. Origins of the segmental arteries in the aorta: an anatomic study for selective catheterization with spinal arteriography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26(4):922–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Amin FR, Yousufuddin M, Stables R, Shamim W, Al-Nasser F, Coats AJ, Clague J, Sigwart U. Femoral haemostasis after transcatheter therapeutic intervention: a prospective randomised study of the Angio-Seal device vs. the Femostop device. Int J Cardiol. 2000;76(2–3):235–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Biancari F, D’Andrea V, Di Marco C, Savino G, Tiozzo V, Catania A. Meta-analysis of randomized trials on the efficacy of vascular closure devices after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. Am Heart J. 2010;159(4):518–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2009.12.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cremonesi A, Castriota F, Tarantino F, Troiani E, Ricci E, El Jamal B, Grattoni C, Noera G. Femoral arterial hemostasis using the Angio-Seal feminine system after coronary and vascular percutaneous angioplasty and stenting. J Invasive Cardiol. 1998;10(8):464–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Das R, Ahmed K, Athanasiou T, Morgan RA, Belli AM. Arterial closure devices versus manual compression for femoral haemostasis in interventional radiological procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011;34(4):723–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-9981-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kapadia SR, Raymond R, Knopf W, Jenkins S, Chapekis A, Ansel G, Rothbaum D, Kussmaul W, Teirstein P, Reisman M, Casale P, Oster L, Simpfendorfer C. The 6Fr Angio-Seal arterial closure device: results from a multimember prospective registry. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87(6):789–91, A788.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kussmaul WG 3rd, Buchbinder M, Whitlow PL, Aker UT, Heuser RR, King SB, Kent KM, Leon MB, Kolansky DM, Sandza JG Jr. Rapid arterial hemostasis and decreased access site complications after cardiac catheterization and angioplasty: results of a randomized trial of a novel hemostatic device. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25(7):1685–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nikolsky E, Mehran R, Halkin A, Aymong ED, Mintz GS, Lasic Z, Negoita M, Fahy M, Krieger S, Moussa I, Moses JW, Stone GW, Leon MB, Pocock SJ, Dangas G. Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(6):1200–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schickel SI, Adkisson P, Miracle V, Cronin SN. Achieving femoral artery hemostasis after cardiac catheterization: a comparison of methods. Am J Crit Care Off Publ Am Assoc Crit Care Nurs. 1999;8(6):406–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu PJ, Dai YT, Kao HL, Chang CH, Lou MF. Access site complications following transfemoral coronary procedures: comparison between traditional compression and Angioseal vascular closure devices for haemostasis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015;15:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-015-0022-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Dawkins AA, Evans AL, Wattam J, Romanowski CA, Connolly DJ, Hodgson TJ, Coley SC. Complications of cerebral angiography: a prospective analysis of 2,924 consecutive procedures. Neuroradiology. 2007;49(9):753–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-007-0252-y.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaufmann TJ, Huston J 3rd, Mandrekar JN, Schleck CD, Thielen KR, Kallmes DF. Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients. Radiology. 2007;243(3):812–9. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2433060536.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pryor JC, Setton A, Nelson PK, Berenstein A. Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography and tips on avoidance. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 1996;6(3):751–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Forbes G, Nichols DA, Jack CR Jr, Ilstrup DM, Kispert DB, Piepgras DG, Wiebers DO, Earnest F, Axley PL. Complications of spinal cord arteriography: prospective assessment of risk for diagnostic procedures. Radiology. 1988;169(2):479–84. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.169.2.3174997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hankey GJ, Warlow CP, Sellar RJ. Cerebral angiographic risk in mild cerebrovascular disease. Stroke. 1990;21(2):209–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA, Flom RA, Bird CR, Drayer BP, Fram EK. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15(8):1401–7; discussion 1408–1411.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Leffers AM, Wagner A. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. A retrospective study of complication rate and patient risk factors. Acta Radiol. 2000;41(3):204–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Maddox TG. Adverse reactions to contrast material: recognition, prevention, and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2002;66(7):1229–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Morcos SK. Prevention of contrast media-induced nephrotoxicity after angiographic procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol JVIR. 2005;16(1):13–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.0000145224.02920.C2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schweiger MJ, Chambers CE, Davidson CJ, Blankenship J, Bhalla NP, Block PC, Dervan JP, Gasperetti C, Gerber L, Kleiman NS, Krone RJ, Phillips WJ, Siegel RM, Uretsky BF, Laskey WK. Prevention of contrast induced nephropathy: recommendations for the high risk patient undergoing cardiovascular procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Off J Soc Card Angiography Interv. 2007;69(1):135–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.20964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Delaney A, Carter A, Fisher M. The prevention of anaphylactoid reactions to iodinated radiological contrast media: a systematic review. BMC Med Imaging. 2006;6:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-6-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Greenberger P, Patterson R, Kelly J, Stevenson DD, Simon D, Lieberman P. Administration of radiographic contrast media in high-risk patients. Investig Radiol. 1980;15(6 Suppl):S40–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Greenberger PA, Halwig JM, Patterson R, Wallemark CB. Emergency administration of radiocontrast media in high-risk patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1986;77(4):630–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lasser EC, Berry CC, Talner LB, Santini LC, Lang EK, Gerber FH, Stolberg HO. Pretreatment with corticosteroids to alleviate reactions to intravenous contrast material. N Engl J Med. 1987;317(14):845–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198710013171401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Culver DA, Chua J, Rehm SJ, Whitlow P, Hertzer NR. Arterial infection and Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia after transfemoral cannulation for percutaneous carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(3):576–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pollard SD, Munks K, Wales C, Crossman DC, Cumberland DC, Oakley GD, Gunn J, Position, Mobilisation Post-Angiography S. Position and Mobilisation Post-angiography Study (PAMPAS): a comparison of 4.5 hours and 2.5 hours bed rest. Heart. 2003;89(4):447–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fawaz Al-Mufti MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thabet, A.M., Meyers, P.M., Al-Mufti, F. (2018). Interventional Cerebral and Spinal Angiography. In: Lanzer, P. (eds) Textbook of Catheter-Based Cardiovascular Interventions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55994-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55994-0_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55993-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55994-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics