Skip to main content

The Iatrogenic Complications of Pelvic Cancer Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Coloproctology

Abstract

Iatrogenic complications from pelvic cancer surgery are numerous and can have significant implications of the patient’s recovery. Surgery is technically challenging because of the constraints of the bony pelvis and the overwhelming requirement to achieve a clear resection margin. Awareness of the potential complications is essential in planning and conducting surgery, as is the recognition and opportune management of them when they arise. Surgery for recurrent disease has its own unique problems which increase the risks considerably. Involvement of the multidisciplinary team and comprehensive counselling of the patient and involvement of immediate relatives is an essential component of the overall process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Georgiou PA, Tekkis PP, Constantinides VA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in planning exenterative pelvic surgery for advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(1):72–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Oktar GL. Iatrogenic major venous injuries incurred during cancer surgery. Surg Today. 2007;37(5):366–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lou Z, Zhang W, Meng RG, Fu CG. Massive presacral bleeding during rectal surgery: from anatomy to clinical practice. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(25):4039–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Millward BL, Fazio VW. Operative blood loss and use of blood products after laparoscopic and conventional open colorectal operations. Arch Surg. 2004;139(1):39–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hanna MH, Vinci A, Pigazzi A. Diverting ileostomy in colorectal surgery: when is it necessary? Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2015;400:145–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blumetti J, Abcarian H. Management of low colorectal anastomotic leak: preserving the anastomosis. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;7(12):378–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Krarup PM, Nordholm-Carstensen A, Jorgensen LN, Harling H. Anastomotic leak increases distant recurrence and long-term mortality after curative resection for colonic cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Ann Surg. 2014;259(5):930–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P. Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2011;253(5):890–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ. Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92(9):1150–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cuccurullo D, Pirozzi F, Sciuto A, Bracale U, La Barbera C, Galante F, Corcione F. Relaparoscopy for management of postoperative complications following colorectal surgery: ten years experience in a single center. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(7):1795–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Blumetti J, Chaudhry V, Cintron JR, Park JJ, Marecik S, Harrison JL, Prasad LM, Abcarian H. Management of anastomotic leak: lessons learned from a large colon and rectal surgery training program. World J Surg. 2014;38(4):985–91. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2340-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sirois-Giguère E, Boulanger-Gobeil C, Bouchard A, Gagné JP, Grégoire RC, Thibault C, Bouchard P. Transanal drainage to treat anastomotic leaks after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a valuable option. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(5):586–92. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827687a4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Caulfield H, Hyman NH. Anastomotic leak after low anterior resection: a spectrum of clinical entities. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(2):177–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Riss S, Stift A, Meier M, Haiden E, GrĂ¼nberger T, Bergmann M. Endo-sponge assisted treatment of anastomotic leakage following colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(7 Online):e104–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fleshman JW, McLeod RS, Cohen Z, Stern H. Improved results following use of an advancement technique in the treatment of ileoanal anastomotic complications. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1988;3:161–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Swain BT, Ellis CN. Fibrin glue treatment of low rectal and pouch-anal anastomotic sinuses. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:253–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dobson MW, Geisler D, Fazio V, Remzi F, Hull T, Vogel J. Minimally invasive surgical wound infections: laparoscopic surgery decreases morbidity of surgical site infections and decreases the cost of wound care. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(7):811–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson TR, Welbourn H, Stanley P, Hartley JE. The success of rectus and gracilis muscle flaps in the treatment of chronic pelvic sepsis and persistent perineal sinus: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16(10):751–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Davidge KM, Raghuram K, Hofer SO, et al. Impact of flap reconstruction on perineal wound complications following ablative surgery for advanced and recurrent rectal cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:2068–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hollabaugh RS, Steiner MS, Sellers KD, Samm BJ, Dmochowski RR. Neuroanatomy of the pelvis: implications for colonic and rectal resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(10):1390–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Delacroix Jr SE, Winters JC. Voiding dysfunction after pelvic colorectal surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2010;23(2):119–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Heriot AG, Tekkis PP, Fazio VW, Neary P, Lavery IC. Adjuvant radiotherapy is associated with increased sexual dysfunction in male patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: a predictive model. Ann Surg. 2005;242(4):502–10. discussion 510–1

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Keating JP. Sexual function after rectal excision. ANZ J Surg. 2004;74(4):248–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Havenga K, Enker WE, McDermott K, Cohen AM, Minsky BD, Guillem J. Male and female sexual and urinary function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;182(6):495–502.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hendren SK, O'Connor BI, Liu M, Asano T, Cohen Z, Swallow CJ, Macrae HM, Gryfe R, McLeod RS. Prevalence of male and female sexual dysfunction is high following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2005;242(2):212–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Delacroix Jr SE, Winters JC. Urinary tract injuries: recognition and management. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2010;23(3):104–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Burks FN, Santucci RA. Management of iatrogenic ureteral injury. Ther Adv Urol. 2014;6(3):115–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Beck DE. Perineal hernia. In: Fazio V, Church JM, Delaney CP, editors. Current therapy in colon and rectal surgery. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Foster JD, Pathak S, Smart NJ, Branagan G, Longman RJ, Thomas MG, Francis N. Reconstruction of the perineum following extralevator abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the lower rectum: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(9):1052–9. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03169.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Howell AM, Jarral OA, Faiz O, Ziprin P, Darzi A, Zacharakis E. How should perineal wounds be closed following abdominoperineal resection in patients post radiotherapy—primary closure or flap repair? Best evidence topic (BET). Int J Surg. 2013;11(7):514–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Martijnse IS, Holman F, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Rutten HJ, Nienhuijs SW. Perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal rectal excision. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(1):90–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Christensen HK, Nerstrøm P, Tei T, Laurberg S. Perineal repair after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(6):711–7. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3182163c89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sheckter CC, Shakir A, Vo H, Tsai J, Nazerali R, Lee GK. Reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection (APR): indications and complications from a single institution experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Jul 2. pii: S1748-6815(16)30140-1.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Moran B. Adhesion related small bowel obstruction. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(Suppl 2):39–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D, McGuire A, Lower AM, Hawthorn RJ, O'Brien F, Buchan S, Crowe AM. Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 1999;353(9163):1476–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sarr MG, Buckley GB, Zuidema GD. Preoperative recognition of intestinal strangulation obstruction: prospective evaluation of diagnostic capability. Am J Surg. 1983;145:176–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Branco BC, Barmparas G, Schnuriger B, Inaba K, Chan LS, Demetriades D. Systemic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic and therapeutic role of water-soluble contrast agent in adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg. 2010;97:470–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Beyond TME Collaborative. Consensus statement on the multidisciplinary management of patients with recurrent and primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes. Br J Surg. 2013;100(8):1009–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Heriot AG, Byrne CM, Lee P, Dobbs B, Tilney H, Solomon MJ, Mackay J, Frizelle F. Extended radical resection: the choice for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(3):284–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander G. Heriot MB, BChir, MD, FRCSEd, FRACS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heriot, A.G., Simpson, J.A.D. (2017). The Iatrogenic Complications of Pelvic Cancer Surgery. In: Beynon, J., Harris, D., Davies, M., Evans, M. (eds) Coloproctology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55957-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55957-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55955-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55957-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics