Skip to main content

The Search for Optimal Macronutrient Recommendations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Nutrition in a Changing World

Abstract

RDAs are essential for evaluating the quality of food intake as well as for planning food supply. Commenced in the 1950s, the ‘Seven Countries Study’ conducted by Ancel Keys gave rise to the general RDA to reduce the proportion of saturated fat in the daily diet. As a consequence, for at least two decades, all RDA committees reduced their fat recommendations from about 40 En% to levels as low as 25 En%, emphasizing in particular the reduction of saturated fat. With some time lag, the food industry followed the advice of nutritional scientists and created in nearly all product sectors low-fat alternatives with similar taste patterns to the products they replaced. However, these changes failed to influence the increasing rise of obesity worldwide. The so-called ‘American Paradox’ was born: A decrease in fat intake and a simultaneous increase in sugar intake were observed, but the increase in the prevalence of obesity was not arrested. This chapter examines the roles of the macronutrients fat, carbohydrate and protein in the diet and their respective and combined influences on weight change. It concludes that only RCTs under ad libitum conditions are valid for making judgements about the importance of the macronutrient composition of the diet in relation to energy intake and weight change, and that the world must rise to the challenge of increasing the nutrient quality of existing diets while simultaneously reducing their energy density at reasonable cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Keys A, Brozek J, Henschel A, Mickelsen O, Longstreet Taylor H, The biology of human starvation, Volume 1 and 2, The University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vardavas CI, Linarkis M, Hatzis C, Saris WHM, Kafatos A, Cardiovascular disease risk factors and dietary habits of farmers from Crete 45 years after the first description of the Mediterranean diet. Eur. J. Card. Prev. and Rehab. 2010: 17; 440–446.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bray GA, Popkin BM. Dietary fat intake does affect obesity! Amer. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998: 68; 1157–1173.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Astrup A, Grunwald GK, Melanson EL, Saris WHM, Hill JO. The role of low-fat diets in body weight control: a meta-analysis of ad libitum dietary intervention studies. Int. J. Obes. 2000: 24; 1545–1552.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mensink RP, Zock PL, Kester ADM, Katan MB. Effects of dietary lipids and carbohydrates on the ratio of serum total to HDL cholesterol and on serum lipids and apolipoproteins: a meta-analysis of 60 controlled trials Amer. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003: 77; 1146–1155.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dhurandhar NV, Schoeller D, Brown AW, Heymsfield SB, Thomas D, Sorensen TIA, Speakman JR, Allison DB and the energy balance measurement working group. Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing. Int. J. Obes. 2014:38; 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carden TJ and Carr TP. Food availability of glucose and fat, but not fructose, increased in the US between 1970 and 2009 Analysis of the USDA food availability data system. Nutr. J. 2013: 12; 130–138.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mattes RD. Fluid energy—where’s the problem? J. Amer. Diet. Ass. 2006: 106; 1965–1961.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hu FB. Resolved: there is sufficient scientific evidence that decreasing sugar sweetened beverage consumption will reduce the prevalence and risk of obesity. Obesity reviews 2013: 14; 606–619.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Malik VS, Pan A, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar—sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis Amer. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013: 98; 1084–1102.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fung TT, Malik V, Rexrode KM, Manson JE, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sweetened beverage consumption and risk of coronary heart disease in women. Amer. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009: 89; 1037–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Greenwood DC, Threapleton DE, Evans CE, Cleghorn CL, Nykjear C, Woodhead C. Association between sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened soft drinks and type 2 diabetes; systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies Brit. J. Nutr. 2014: 112; 725–796.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stanhope KL, Schwarz JM, Keim NL, Griffen SC, Bremer AA, et al. Consuming fructose –sweetened, not glucose sweetened, beverages increase visceral adiposity and lipids and decreases insulin sensitivity in overweight/obese humans J. Clin. Invest. 2009: 119; 1322–1334.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bray GA, Popkins BM. Calorie-sweetened beverages and fructose: what have we learned 10 years later Pediatr. Obes. 2013: 8; 242–248.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kahn R, Sievenpiper JL. Dietary sugar and body weight: have we reached a crisis in the epidemic of obesity and diabetes. We have, but the pox on sugar is overwrought and overworked—Diabetes Care 2014: 37; 957–962.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Te Morenga L, Mallard S, Mann J. Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. BMJ. 2013: 346; e 7492.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sievenpieper JL, de Souza RJ, Mirrahimi A, Carleton AJ, Beyene J, et al. Effect of fructose on body weight in controlled feeding trial: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ann. Intern. Med. 2012: 156; 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kaiser KA, Shikany JM, Keating KD, Allison DB. Will reducing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption reduce obesity? Evidence supporting conjecture id strong but evidence when testing is weak Obes. Rev. 2013: 14; 620–633.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Petersen M, Taylor MA, Saris WHM, Verdich C, Toubro S, et al. Randomized, multi-center trial of two hypo-energetic diets in obese subjects: high- versus low-fat content. Int. J Obes. 2006: 30; 552–560.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saris WH, A Astrup, AM Prentice, HJF Zunft, X Formiguera, et al. Randomized controlled trial of changes in dietary carbohydrate/fat ratio and simple vs. complex carbohydrates on body weight and blood lipids: the CARMEN study. Int. J. Obes. 2000: 24; 1310–1318.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schwingshacki L, Hoffmann G. Long-term effects of low glycemic index/load vs. high glycemic index/load diets on parameters of obesity and obesity-associated risks: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2013: 23; 699–706.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maersk M, Belza A, Holst JJ, Fenger-Gron M, Pedersen SB et al. Satiety scores and satiety hormones response after sucrose-sweetened soft drink compared with iso-caloric semi-skimmed milk and with non-caloric soft drink: a controlled trial. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012: 66; 523–529.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Larsen TM, Dalskov SM, van Baak MA, Jebb SA, Papadaki A, et al. for the Diet, Obesity, and Genes (Diogenes) Project. Diets with High or Low Protein Content and Glycemic Index for Weight-Loss Maintenance. New Eng. J. Med. 2010: 363; 2102–2013.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Aller EE, Larsen TM, Claus H, Lindroos AK, Kafatos A, et al. Weight loss maintenance in overweight subjects on ad libitum diets with high or low protein content and glycemic index: the Diogenes trial. Int. J. Obes. 2014: 38; 1511–1517.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Papadaki A, Linardakis M, Larsen TM, van baak MA, Lindroos AK, et al and on behalf of the DiOGenes Study Group. The Effect of Protein and Glycemic Index on Children’s Body Composition: The DiOGenes Randomized Study Pediatrics 2010: 126; e1143–52.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Clifton PM, Condo D, Keogh JB. Long-term weight maintenance after advice to consume low carbohydrate, higher protein diets—a systematic review and meta-analysis Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2014: 24; 224–235.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Johnston BC, Kanters S, Bandayrel K, Wu P, Faysal F, et al. Comparison of weight loss among named diet programs in overweight and obese adults; a meta-analysis. J.A.M.A. 2014: 312; 923–933.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Van Horn L. A diet by any other name is still about energy J.A.M.A. 2014; 312: 900–901.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Eaton SB, Shostak M, Konner M. The Paleolithic prescription. A program of diet & exercise and a design for living. Harper & Row Publ. New York 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Drewnowski A. The real contribution of added sugar and fats to obesity. Epidemiological Reviews 29: 29; 160–171.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Aggarwal A, Monsivais P, Drewnowski A. Nutrient intakes linked to better health outcomes are associated with higher diet costs in the US. Plos One 2012: 7; e 37533.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wim H. M. Saris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saris, W.H.M. (2017). The Search for Optimal Macronutrient Recommendations. In: Biesalski, H., Drewnowski, A., Dwyer, J., Strain, J., Weber, P., Eggersdorfer, M. (eds) Sustainable Nutrition in a Changing World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55942-1_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics