CEO Blame Games

  • Petter GottschalkEmail author


The blame game is a potential aspect of investigation reports in practice, where examiners complete the report by placing the blame for misconduct or crime on individual(s), which the client who ordered the investigation might prefer to see blamed for it. The mandate for a private investigation can be part of the blame game , where the client wants to blame somebody while at the same time diverge attention from somebody else.


Investigation Fraud examination Blame game Private investigators 


  1. Ånestad, M. (2016‚ November 7). Formålet var å ramme gammel ledelse [The purpose was to harm the previous management], daily Norwegian newspaper Dagens Næringsliv, p. 10.Google Scholar
  2. Brooks, G., & Button, M. (2011). The police and fraud investigation and the case for a nationalized solution in the United Kingdom. The Police Journal, 84‚ 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Button, M., Frimpong, K., Smith, G., & Johnston, L. (2007). Professionalizing counter fraud specialists in the UK: Assessing progress and recommendations for reform. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 9‚ 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carson, D. (2013). Investigations: What could, and should, be taught? The Police Journal, 86(3), 249–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Datner, B. (2011). The blame game: How the hidden rules of credit and blame determine our success or failure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Deloitte. (2016). Review—Ownership VimpelCom Telenor ASA, signed Anne Helsingeng (partner, attorney-at-law) and Ingebret G. Hisdal (partner, special advisor), Deloitte, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
  7. DoJ. (2016). Statements of facts. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Fraud Section, Washington, DC (30 pp).
  8. Dupont, B. (2014). Private security regimes: Conceptualizing the forces that shape the private delivery of security. Theoretical Criminology, 18(3), 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eberly, M. B., Holley, E. C., Johnson, M. D., & Mitchell, T. R. (2011). Beyond internal and external: A dyadic theory of relational attributions. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 731–753.Google Scholar
  10. Ekeberg, E. (2016a, May 27). Kritisk til granskinger [Critical to investigations], daily Norwegian newspaper Klassekampen.
  11. Ekeberg, E. (2016b, July 22). Visste om lyssky kontoer [Knew about shady accounts], daily Norwegian newspaper Klassekampen, pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
  12. Ekeberg, E. (2016c, July 26). Nordea fant lovbrudd [Nordea found law violations], daily Norwegian newspaper Klassekampen, pp. 12–13.Google Scholar
  13. Ekeberg, E. (2016d, July 27). Tar paradisene i forsvar [Takes havens in defense], daily Norwegian newspaper Klassekampen, pp. 10–11.Google Scholar
  14. Ekeberg, E. (2016e, July 28). Skuffet over Telenor-toppen [Disappointed of Telenor top], daily Norwegian newspaper Klassekampen, pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
  15. Farber, N. E. (2010). The blame game—The complete guide to blaming—How to play and how to quit. Minneapolis, MN: Bascom Hill Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  16. Gottschalk, P. (2016). Explaining white-collar crime: The concept of convenience in financial crime investigations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Green, B. A., & Podgor, E. (2013). Unregulated internal investigations: Achieving fairness for corporate constituents. Boston College Law Review, 54(1), 73–126.Google Scholar
  18. Greenwald, G. (2012). With liberty and justice for some: How the law is used to destroy equality and protect the powerful. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  19. Hammond, J. S., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1998). The hidden traps in decision making. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 47–58.Google Scholar
  20. Hein, M. (2014). The blame game.…/theblamegamev2.doc.
  21. Hjort. (2016). Rapport til styret I DNB ASA [Report to the board of directors at DNB ASA], law firm Hjort, Oslo, 18 pp. Retrieved from
  22. Hood, C. (2011). The blame game—Spin, bureaucracy, and self-preservation in government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hovland, K. M., & Gauthier-Villars, D. (2015, November 5). VimpelCom bribery investigations spark Telenor review. The Wall Street Journal.
  24. Hustadnes, H. (2015‚ December 11). –Brekke må gå før sommeren [-Brekke must leave before the summer], daily Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet, p. 10.Google Scholar
  25. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Keaveney, S. M. (2008). The blame game: An attribution theory approach to marketer-engineer conflict in high-technology companies. Industrial Marketing Management, 37‚ 653–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee, F., & Robinson, R. J. (2000). An attributional analysis of social accounts: Implications of playing the blame game. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(9), 1853–1879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mannheimer Swartling. (2016). Governance Review, Report to Nordea Bank AB, law firm (advokatbyrå) Mannheimer Swartling. Stockholm, Sweden (20 pp).
  29. Meerts, C. (2014). Empirical case studies of corporate security in international perspective. In K. Walby & R. K. Lippert (Eds.), Corporate security in the 21st century—Theory and practice in international perspective (pp. 97–115). Hampshire and Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Mingus, W., & Burchfield, K. B. (2012). From prison to integration: Applying modified labeling theory to sex offenders. Criminal Justice Studies, 25(1), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nordea. (2016). Report on Investigation of Nordea Private Banking in Relation to Offshore Structures. Nordea Group Compliance and Group Operational Risk, Stockholm, Sweden (12 pp).
  32. Osterburg, J. W., & Ward, R. H. (2014). Criminal investigations: A method for reconstructing the past (7th ed.). Waltham, MA: Anderson Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Pontell, H. N., Black, W. K., & Geis, G. (2014). Too big to fail, too powerful to jail? On the absence of criminal prosecutions after the 2008 financial meltdown. Crime, Law and Social Change, 61(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schneider, S. (2006). Privatizing economic crime enforcement: Exploring the role of private sector investigative agencies in combating money laundering. Policing & Society, 16(3), 285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shepherd, D. A., Patzelt, H., & Wolfe, M. (2011). Moving forward from project failure: Negative emotions, affective commitment, and learning from the experience. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1229–1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Slyke, S. V., & Bales, W. D. (2012). A contemporary study of the decision to incarcerate white-collar and street property offenders. Punishment & Society, 14(2), 217–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sonnier, B. M., Lassar, W. M., & Lassar, S. S. (2015). The influence of source credibility and attribution of blame on juror evaluation of liability of industry specialist auditors. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting, 7(1), 1–37.Google Scholar
  38. Trumpy, J. (2016‚ July 14). Avgått Telenor-direktør i ny havn [Resigned Telenor executive in new harbor], daily Norwegian business newspaper Dagens Næringsliv, p. 16.Google Scholar
  39. Valukas, A. R. (2014‚ May 29). Report to board of directors of General Motors Company regarding ignition switch recalls, law firm Jenner & Block (325 pp).
  40. Williams, J. W. (2005). Governability matters: The private policing of economic crime and the challenge of democratic governance. Policing & Society, 15(2), 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Williams, J. W. (2014). The private eyes of corporate culture: The forensic accounting and corporate investigation industry and the production of corporate financial security. In K. Walby & R. K. Lippert (Eds.), Corporate security in the 21st century—Theory and practice in international perspective, (pp. 56–77). Hampshire and Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Leadership and Organizational BehaviourBI Norwegian Business SchoolOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations