Advertisement

Convenient Financial Motive

  • Petter GottschalkEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Convenience theory suggests that white-collar crime by CEOs occurs because of a financial motive , an organizational opportunity , and an acceptable deviant behavior. The Russian-American psychologist Abraham Maslow developed a hierarchy of human needs. Needs start at the bottom with physiological need, need for security, social need, and need for respect and self-realization . When basic needs such as food and shelter are satisfied, then the person moves up the pyramid to satisfy needs for safety and control over own life situation.

Keywords

Convenience theory Organizational opportunity Profit-driven crime Neutralization techniques 

References

  1. Baumann, F., & Friehe, T. (2016). Competitive pressure and corporate crime. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 16(2), 647–687.Google Scholar
  2. Berry, L. L., Seiders, K., & Grewal, D. (2002). Understanding service convenience. Journal of Marketing, 66, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertrand, O., & Lumineau, F. (2016). Partners in crime: The effects of diversity on the longevity of cartels. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 983–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Collier, J. E., & Kimes, S. E. (2012). Only if it is convenient: Understanding how convenience influences self-service technology evaluation. Journal of Service Research, 16(1), 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dearden, T. E. (2016). Trust: The unwritten cost of white-collar crime. Journal of Financial Crime, 23(1), 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Farquhar, J. D., & Rowley, J. (2009). Convenience: A services perspective. Marketing Theory, 9(4), 425–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gottschalk, P. (2016). Explaining white-collar crime: The concept of convenience in financial crime investigations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Holtfreter, K. (2015). General theory, gender-specific theory, and white-collar crime. Journal of Financial Crime, 22(4), 422–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jonnergård, K., Stafsudd, A., & Elg, U. (2010). Performance evaluations as gender barriers in professional organizations: A study of auditing firms. Gender, Work and Organization, 17(6), 721–747.Google Scholar
  10. Mai, H. T. X., & Olsen, S. O. (2016). Consumer participation in self-production: The role of control mechanisms, convenience orientation, and moral obligation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 24(2), 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Piquero, N. L. (2012). The only thing we have to fear is fear itself: Investigating the relationship between fear of falling and white collar crime. Crime and Delinquency, 58(3), 362–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2005). Assessing macro-level predictors and theories of crime: A meta-analysis. Crime and Justice, 32, 373–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sundström, M., & Radon, A. (2015). Utilizing the concept of convenience as a business opportunity in emerging markets. Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 6(2), 7–21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Leadership and Organizational BehaviourBI Norwegian Business SchoolOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations