Skip to main content

A Density Theorem for Hierarchies of Limit Spaces over Separable Metric Spaces

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Theory and Applications of Models of Computation (TAMC 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10185))

  • 771 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we show, almost constructively, a density theorem for hierarchies of limit spaces over separable metric spaces. Our proof is not fully constructive, since it relies on the constructively not acceptable fact that the limit relation induced by a metric space satisfies Urysohn’s axiom for limit spaces. By adding the condition of strict positivity to Normann’s notion of probabilistic projection we establish a relation between strictly positive general probabilistic selections on a sequential space and general approximation functions on a limit space. Showing that Normann’s result, that a (general and strictly positive) probabilistic selection is definable on a separable metric space, admits a constructive proof, and based on the constructively shown in [18] cartesian closure property of the category of limit spaces with general approximations, our quite effective density theorem follows. This work, which is a continuation of [18], is within computability theory at higher types and Normann’s Program of Internal Computability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is a result of Hannes Diener (personal communication).

  2. 2.

    If \((x_{n})_{n \in {{\mathbb {N}}}} \subseteq X\), for simplicity we write \(\lim _{X}(x, x_{n})\) instead of \(\lim _{X}(x, (x_{n})_{n \in {{\mathbb {N}}}})\), and \(\lim _{X}(x, x)\) instead of \(\lim _{X}(x, (x))\).

  3. 3.

    Namely, the continuity condition used by Normann is different from the condition \((P_{3})\) used here, but one can show that they are equivalent. Since no continuity condition affects the main density theorem, we do not include here the proof of their equivalence.

  4. 4.

    This principle is generally accepted within \(\mathrm {BISH}\) (see [3], p. 12).

  5. 5.

    If \(c, d \in {{\mathbb {R}}}\), we use the notations \(c \vee d := \max \{c, d\}\), and \(c \wedge d := \min \{c, d\}\).

  6. 6.

    The argument for the case of two positive numbers is the one used in the inductive step of the induction on n. If \(c_{1}, c_{2} > 0\), there are rationals \(q_{1}, q_{2}\) such that \(0< q_{1} < c_{1}\) and \(0< q_{2} < c_{2}\) (see [2], p. 25). Since \(q_{1} \wedge q_{2}\) is either \(q_{1}\) or \(q_{2}\), we get that \(q_{1} \wedge q_{2} < c_{1}\) and \(q_{1} \wedge q_{2} < c_{2}\), hence \(0 < q_{1} \wedge q_{2} \le c_{1} \wedge c_{2}\).

  7. 7.

    Classically, this is trivial, since there is some \(j \in \{1, \ldots , n\}\) such that \(d(x, A_{n}) = d(x, a_{j})\), hence .

  8. 8.

    The proof is based on the fact that if \(c \le a\) and \(c \le b\), then \(c \le a \wedge b\), since if \(c > a \wedge b\), then \(c > a\) or \(c > b\) (this is the dual of a property of the maximum of real numbers included in [4], p. 57, Ex. 3).

  9. 9.

    If \(c \vee 0 > 0\), then \(c> 0 \vee 0 > 0\) (see [4], p. 57). Hence, \(c > 0\) is the case, and then we get immediately that \(c \vee 0 = c\).

  10. 10.

    Where the notion of approximation, as it is expressed in condition \((A_{3})\) of Definition 2, will depend on the structure of X.

References

  1. Bishop, E.: Foundations of Constructive Analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York (1967)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bishop, E., Bridges, D.: Constructive Analysis. Springer, Heidelberg (1985)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bridges, D., Richman, F.: Varieties of Constructive Mathematics. University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bridges, D.S., Vîţă, L.S.: Techniques of Constructive Analysis. Universitext. Springer, New York (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. DeJaeger, F.: Calculabilité sur les réels. Thesis, Paris VII (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dugundji, J.: Topology. Universal Book Stall, New Delhi (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hyland, M.: Recursion theory on the countable functionals. Dissertation, Oxford (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kuratowski, K.: Topology, vol. I. Academic Press, New York (1966)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuratowski, K.: Topology, vol. II. Academic Press, New York (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Longley, J., Normann, D.: Higher-Order Computability. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Normann, D.: External and internal algorithms on the continuous functionals. In: Metakides, G. (ed.) Patras Logic Symposion, pp. 137–144. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam (1982)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Normann, D.: Internal density theorems for hierarchies of continuous functionals. In: Beckmann, A., Dimitracopoulos, C., Löwe, B. (eds.) CiE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5028, pp. 467–475. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69407-6_50

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Normann, D.: A rich hierarchy of functionals of finite types. Logical Methods Comput. Sci. 5(3:11), 1–21 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Normann, D.: Experiments on an internal approach to typed algorithms in analysis. In: Cooper, S.B., Sorbi, A. (eds.) Computability in context: computation and logic in the real world, pp. 297–327. Imperial College Press, London (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Normann, D.: Banach spaces as data types. Logical Methods Comput. Sci. 7(2:11), 1–20 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Normann, D.: The continuous functionals as limit spaces. In: Berger, U., Diener, H., Schuster, P., Seisenberger, M. (eds.) Logic, Construction, Computation Mathematical Logic, vol. 3, pp. 353–379. Ontos, Heusenstamm (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Petrakis, I.: Limit spaces in computability at higher types, manuscript (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Petrakis, I.: Limit spaces with approximations. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 167(9), 737–752 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Scarpellini, B.: A model for barrecursion of higher types. Compositio Mathematica 23(1), 123–153 (1971)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Ulrich Berger for his insightful comments on an early draft of this paper and Hannes Diener for informing us on his result that relates Urysohn’s axiom to LPO. We also thank the reviewers for their useful comments and suggestions and the Excellence Initiative of the LMU Munich for supporting our research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iosif Petrakis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Petrakis, I. (2017). A Density Theorem for Hierarchies of Limit Spaces over Separable Metric Spaces. In: Gopal, T., Jäger , G., Steila, S. (eds) Theory and Applications of Models of Computation. TAMC 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10185. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55911-7_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55911-7_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55910-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55911-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics