Skip to main content

Institutional Endowment and Innovation Strategies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Management Engineering

Abstract

Firms understand that cooperation is key to sustainable innovation. Knowledge accumulated inside the firm requires external catharsis if the firm is to reinvent itself. Institutional endowment influences those cooperative processes, acting as a barrier or leverage. When building balanced cooperation strategies, the extent to which firms make their contributions counts in the innovation race by using “the wind behind” them, and it will determine how sustainable their performance is. Understanding the impact of institutional endowment on innovation strategies might reduce causal ambiguity and therefore help firms to contextualize their innovation strategies. The aim of this paper is to contribute with a type of cooperative innovation strategy dependent on two institutional factors: culture networking and the legal system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 425–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, P. (1996). Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aragón-Correa, J. A. (1998). Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 556–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aragón-Correa, J. A., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., & García-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1), 88–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arruñada, B., & Andonova, V. (2008). Common law and civil law as Pro-market adaptations. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 26, 81–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco Callejo, M. B., & Forcadell Martínez, F. J. F. (2006). El Real Madrid Club de Fútbol: la aplicación de un modelo empresarial a una entidad deportiva en España. Universia Business Review, 3(11), 36–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., & Adamson, C. (2015). Innovation: Integration of random variation and creative synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 40(3), 461–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua R. Y. J., Roth, Y., & Lemoine, J. F. (2015). The impact of culture on creativity: How cultural tightness and cultural distance affect global innovation crowd sourcing work. Administrative Science Quarterly 602189227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coriat, B., & Orsi, F. (2002). Establishing a new intellectual property rights regime in the United States. Origins, content and problems. Research Policy, 31, 1491–1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A., & Henisz, W. (2003). Political hazards, experience and sequential entry strategies: The international expansion of Japanese firms, 1980–1998. Strategic Management Journal, 24(11), 1153–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delios, A., & Henisz, W. (2000). Japanese firm’s investment strategies in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 305–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez, A. (2009). Entrevista en el hotel Waldorf Astoria. Alumni Reunion IESE: Nueva York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erez, M., & Nouri, R. (2010). Creativity: The influence of cultural, social, and work contexts. Management and Organization Review, 6, 351–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felin, T., & Zenger, T. R. (2014). Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Research Policy, 43(5), 914–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, T.S. (2001). The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries’ innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 101–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godart, F. C., Maddux, W. W., Shipilov, A. V., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Fashion with a foreign flair: Professional experiences abroad facilitate the creative innovations of organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 195–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.H., & Ziedonis, R. H. (2001). The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RAND Journal of Economics spring (pp. 101–128).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heide, J. B., & Stump, R. L. (1995). Performance implications of buyer-supplier relationships in industrial markets: A transaction cost explanation. Journal of Business Research, 32(1), 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W., & Delios, A. (2001). Uncertainty, imitation and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990–96. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 443–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W., & Zelner, B. (2001). The institutional environment for telecommunications investment. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10(1), 123–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, Witold, & Zelner, B. (2005). Legitimacy, interest group pressures and change in emergent institutions: The case of foreign investors and host country governments. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 361–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, V. & Nieto, M. J. (2015). Inward–outward connections and their impact on firm growth. International Business Review in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herstad, S., Aslesen, H. W., & Ebersberger, B. (2014). On industrial knowledge bases, commercial opportunities and global innovation network linkages. Research Policy, 43, 495–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herstad, S. J., Sandven, T., & Ebersberger, B. (2015). Recruitment, knowledge integration and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 44, 138–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s recent consequences: Using dimension scores in theory and research. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 1(1), 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2009). American culture and the 2008 financial crisis. European Business Review, 21(4), 307–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2010). The globe debate: Back to relevance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8), 1339–1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., Garibaldi de Hilal, A. V., Malvezzi, S., Tanure, B., & Vinken, H. (2010). Comparing regional cultures within a country: Lessons from Brazil. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(3), 336–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2012). Hofstede’s fifth dimension: New evidence from the world values survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Informe Cotec (2014). Impacto de la regulación sobre la innovación Colección Innovación Práctica, Fundación Cotec para la Innovación Tecnológica 66 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horizon (2020). The EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/innovation-smes

  • Jaruzelski, B., Loehr, J., & Holman, R. (2012). The global innovation 1000. Making ideas work. Strategy+Business, Booz&Co winter, 69, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaruzelski, B., Staack, V., & Goehle, B. (2014). Proven paths to innovation success. Ten years of research reveal the best R&D strategies for the decade ahead. Strategy+Business, Booz&Co winter, 77, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Javorcik, B. S. (2004). The composition of foreign direct investment and protection of intellectual property rights: Evidence from transition economies. European Economic Review, 48(1), 39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, G., & Weitz, B. A. (1988). Forward integration into distribution: An empirical test of transaction cost analysis. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 4(2), 337–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. R., & Hill, C. W. (1988). Transaction cost analysis of strategy-structure choice. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2), 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingley, A., Vanden Bergh, R., & Bonardi, J. P. (2012). Political market and regulatory uncertainty: Insights and implications for integrated strategy. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(3), 52–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B., Crawford, R. G., & Alchian, A. A. (1978). Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. Journal of Law and Economics, 21(2), 297–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S., Frazier, G. L., & Roth, V. J. (1990). A transaction cost analysis model of channel integration in international markets. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 196–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koekoek, P. (2012). Innovative companies: Making Europe the best place to grow highly innovative ICT SMEs. Report of a High-Level Panel Discussion. DG Connect Brussels 17 September 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, 52(3), 1131–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. National Bureau of Economic Research w6594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, J. H., Roper, S., & Vahter, P. (2014). Dynamic complementarities in innovation strategies. Research Policy, 43, 1774–1784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. I. (1999). Creativity across cultures. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed) Handbook of creativity (pp. 339–350). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A., Aragon-Correa, J. A., & Pinkse, J. (2011). Firms, regulatory uncertainty, and the natural environment. California Management Review, 54(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín García, P., & de Pablos, Heredero C. (2014). Liderazgo acomodaticio y resultados empresariales: Una aproximación desde el análisis de Steve Jobs. Interciencia, 39(9), 673–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Noya A, García-Canal, E., & Guillén, M. F. (2010). Why do firms locate R&D outsourcing agreements offshore? The role of ownership, location, and externalization advantages. Fundación de las Cajas de Ahorros. Documento de trabajo nº 526/2010:1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Noya, A., & García-Canal, E. (2011). Technological capabilities and the decision to outsource/outsource offshore R&D services. International Business Review, 20(3), 264–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, A., & Morris, M. W. (2010). Asian-Americans’ creative styles in Asian and American situations: Assimilative and contrastive responses as a function of bicultural identity integration. Management and Organization Review, 6, 371–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooij, M., & Hofstede, G. (2010). Applications to global branding and advertising strategy and research. International Journal of Advertising: The Review of Marketing Communications, 29(1), 85–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (1993). Firm size effects on transaction costs. Small Business Economics, 5(4), 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, K. H., & Williamson, J. G. (2002). When did globalisation begin? European Review of Economic History, 6(1), 23–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pothukuchi, V., Damanpour, F., Choi, J., Chen, C. C., & Park, S. H. (2002). National and organizational culture differences and international joint venture performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33, 243–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saeki, N., Fan, X., & Dusen, L. (2001). A comparative study of creative thinking of American and Japanese college students. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(1), 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (1995). Uncertainty avoidance and the preference for innovation championing roles. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D. G., & Lane, P. J. (2004). A model of cultural differences and international alliance performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(4), 306–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vega-Jurado, J., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., Fernández-de-Lucio, I., & Manjarrés-Henríquez, L. (2008). The effect of external and internal factors on firms’ product innovation. Research Policy, 37(4), 616–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Rodan, S., Fruin, M., & Xu, X. (2014). Knowledge networks, collaboration networks, and exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 484–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (2000). The institutional structuring of innovation strategies: business systems, firm types and patterns of technical change in different market economies. Organization Studies, 21(5), 855–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 2, 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1989). Transactions cost economics. In R. Willig (Eds) Handbook of industrial organization vol. 1 North-Holland (pp. 135–182).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 269–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, X., Tam, K. P., Morris, M. W., Lee, S., Lau, I. Y. M., & Chiu, C. (2009). Culture as common sense: Perceived consensus versus personal beliefs as mechanisms of cultural influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 579–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalia Martin-Cruz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gamez-Alcalde, C., De Pablos-Heredero, C., Martin-Cruz, N. (2017). Institutional Endowment and Innovation Strategies. In: Hernández, C. (eds) Advances in Management Engineering. Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55889-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55889-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55888-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55889-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics