Skip to main content

Minimally Invasive Component Separation for the Repair of Large Abdominal Wall Defects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgery of Complex Abdominal Wall Defects

Abstract

Minimally invasive anterior component separation technique is a feasible and reproducible procedure that restores the abdominal midline and therefore can play a role in the repair of large abdominal defects, helping to promote a physiological abdominal reconstruction. It is advantageous when dealing with a contaminated setting as it may permit an abdominal midline closure without applying prosthetic material. If complete midline restoration is not possible, anterior component separation helps in reducing the abdominal wall defect, decreasing the amount of necessary mesh for a bridge repair, respecting as much as possible the physiology and kinetics of the abdominal wall. Minimally invasive anterior component separation has many advantages over classic open techniques avoiding large skin flaps and consequent wound healing related problems. More studies are needed to compare different minimally invasive techniques regarding myofascial advancement flaps and respective costs.

In this chapter we describe and illustrate in detail the video-assisted anterior component separation technique and discuss special settings where it can be useful as in the primary closure of the difficult open abdomen. Finally, it is fundamental to keep in mind that minimally invasive component separation technique is just a helpful part of the puzzle involving large and complex abdominal wall defects. Proper planning and attention to details are important for a successful achievement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Thorne C, et al. Grabb and Smith’s plastic surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Wiliams & Wilkins; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Criss CN, Petro CC, Krpata DM, et al. Functional abdominal wall reconstruction improves core physiology and quality-of-life. Surgery. 2014;156(1):176–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL. "components separation" method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86(3):519–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Albanese AR. Gigantic median xipho-umbilical eventration; method for treatment. Rev Asoc Med Argentina. 1951;65:709–10. 376–378

    Google Scholar 

  5. de Vries Reilingh TS, van Goor H, Rosman C, et al. “Components separation technique” for the repair of large abdominal wall hernias. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196(1):32–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lowe 3rd JB, Lowe JB, Baty JD, Garza JR. Risks associated with "components separation" for closure of complex abdominal wall defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(3):1276–83. quiz 1284-1275; discussion 1286-1278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. de Vries Reilingh TS, van Geldere D, Langenhorst B, et al. Repair of large midline incisional hernias with polypropylene mesh: comparison of three operative techniques. Hernia. 2004;8(1):56–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosen MJ, Jin J, McGee MF, Williams C, Marks J, Ponsky JL. Laparoscopic component separation in the single-stage treatment of infected abdominal wall prosthetic removal. Hernia. 2007;11(5):435–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hadad I, Small W, Dumanian GA. Repair of massive ventral hernias with the separation of parts technique: reversal of the 'lost domain'. Am Surg. 2009;75(4):301–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Novitsky YW, Elliott HL, Orenstein SB, Rosen MJ. Transversus abdominis muscle release: a novel approach to posterior component separation during complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg. 2012;204(5):709–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Novitsky YW, Fayezizadeh M, Majumder A, Neupane R, Elliott HL, Orenstein SB. Outcomes of posterior component separation with transversus abdominis muscle release and synthetic mesh sublay reinforcement. Ann Surg. 2016;264:226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hadeed JG, Walsh MD, Pappas TN, et al. Complex abdominal wall hernias: a new classification system and approach to management based on review of 133 consecutive patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;66(5):497–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Slater NJ, Montgomery A, Berrevoet F, et al. Criteria for definition of a complex abdominal wall hernia. Hernia. 2014;18(1):7–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Petro CC, O'Rourke CP, Posielski NM, et al. Designing a ventral hernia staging system. Hernia. 2016;20(1):111–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ko JH, Wang EC, Salvay DM, Paul BC, Dumanian GA. Abdominal wall reconstruction: lessons learned from 200 "components separation" procedures. Arch Surg. 2009;144(11):1047–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moreno IG. Chronic eventrations and large hernias; preoperative treatment by progressive pneumoperitomeum; original procedure. Surgery. 1947;22(6):945–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanaka EY, Yoo JH, Rodrigues Jr AJ, Utiyama EM, Birolini D, Rasslan S. A computerized tomography scan method for calculating the hernia sac and abdominal cavity volume in complex large incisional hernia with loss of domain. Hernia. 2010;14(1):63–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sabbagh C, Dumont F, Robert B, Badaoui R, Verhaeghe P, Regimbeau JM. Peritoneal volume is predictive of tension-free fascia closure of large incisional hernias with loss of domain: a prospective study. Hernia. 2011;15(5):559–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wind J, van Koperen PJ, Slors JF, Bemelman WA. Single-stage closure of enterocutaneous fistula and stomas in the presence of large abdominal wall defects using the components separation technique. Am J Surg. 2009;197(1):24–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Krpata DM, Stein SL, Eston M, et al. Outcomes of simultaneous large complex abdominal wall reconstruction and enterocutaneous fistula takedown. Am J Surg. 2013;205(3):354–8. discussion 358–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Turner PL, Park AE. Laparoscopic repair of ventral incisional hernias: pros and cons. Surg Clin North Am. 2008;88(1):85–100. viii

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. De Silva GS, Krpata DM, Hicks CW, et al. Comparative radiographic analysis of changes in the abdominal wall musculature morphology after open posterior component separation or bridging laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(3):353–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moazzez A, Mason RJ, Katkhouda N. A new technique for minimally invasive abdominal wall reconstruction of complex incisional hernias: totally laparoscopic component separation and incisional hernia repair. Surg Technol Int. 2010;20:185–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Orenstein SB, Dumeer JL, Monteagudo J, Poi MJ, Novitsky YW. Outcomes of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with routine defect closure using "shoelacing" technique. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(5):1452–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Malik K, Bowers SP, Smith CD, Asbun H, Preissler S. A case series of laparoscopic components separation and rectus medialization with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. J Laparoendos Adv Surg Tech Part A. 2009;19(5):607–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jones CM, Winder JS, Potochny JD, Pauli EM. Posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release: technique, utility, and outcomes in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(2):636–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Saulis AS, Dumanian GA. Periumbilical rectus abdominis perforator preservation significantly reduces superficial wound complications in “separation of parts” hernia repairs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(7):2275–80. discussion 2281–2272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Clarke JM. Incisional hernia repair by fascial component separation: results in 128 cases and evolution of technique. Am J Surg. 2010;200(1):2–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Butler CE, Campbell KT. Minimally invasive component separation with inlay bioprosthetic mesh (MICSIB) for complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(3):698–709.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stedman TL. Stedman’s medical dictionary. 28th ed. Philadelpia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Feretis M, Orchard P. Minimally invasive component separation techniques in complex ventral abdominal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015;25(2):100–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Thomsen CO, Brondum TL, Jorgensen LN. Quality of life after ventral hernia repair with endoscopic component separation technique. SJS. 2016;105(1):11–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Switzer NJ, Dykstra MA, Gill RS, et al. Endoscopic versus open component separation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(4):787–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ng N, Wampler M, Palladino H, Agullo F, Davis BR. Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open fascial component separation for complex ventral hernia repair. Am Surg. 2015;81(7):714–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jensen KK, Henriksen NA, Jorgensen LN. Endoscopic component separation for ventral hernia causes fewer wound complications compared to open components separation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(11):3046–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rosen MJ, Williams C, Jin J, et al. Laparoscopic versus open-component separation: a comparative analysis in a porcine model. Am J Surg. 2007;194(3):385–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Harth KC, Rose J, Delaney CP, Blatnik JA, Halaweish I, Rosen MJ. Open versus endoscopic component separation: a cost comparison. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(9):2865–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vaizey CJ, Maeda Y, Barbosa E, et al. European Society of Coloproctology consensus on the surgical management of intestinal failure in adults. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18(6):535–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Blair LJ, Ross SW, Huntington CR, et al. Computed tomographic measurements predict component separation in ventral hernia repair. J Surg Res. 2015;199(2):420–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. DiCocco JM, Magnotti LJ, Emmett KP, et al. Long-term follow-up of abdominal wall reconstruction after planned ventral hernia: a 15-year experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(5):686–95. 695–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Alaedeen DI, Lipman J, Medalie D, Rosen MJ. The single-staged approach to the surgical management of abdominal wall hernias in contaminated fields. Hernia. 2007;11(1):41–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Blatnik JA, Harth KC, Aeder MI, Rosen MJ. Thirty-day readmission after ventral hernia repair: predictable or preventable? Surg Endosc. 2011;25(5):1446–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Latifi R. Practical approaches to definitive reconstruction of complex abdominal wall defects. World J Surg. 2016;40(4):836–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Birolini C, de Miranda JS, Utiyama EM, Rasslan S, Birolini D. Active Staphylococcus aureus infection: is it a contra-indication to the repair of complex hernias with synthetic mesh? A prospective observational study on the outcomes of synthetic mesh replacement, in patients with chronic mesh infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Surg. 2016;28:56–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rahbari NN, Zimmermann JB, Schmidt T, Koch M, Weigand MA, Weitz J. Meta-analysis of standard, restrictive and supplemental fluid administration in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2009;96(4):331–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Fischer JP, Nelson JA, Wes AM, et al. The use of epidurals in abdominal wall reconstruction: an analysis of outcomes and cost. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(3):687–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Rosen MJ. Atlas of abdominal wall reconstruction. 2nd ed. New York: Elsevier; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gassman A, Mehta A, Bucholdz E, et al. Positive outcomes with negative pressure therapy over primarily closed large abdominal wall reconstruction reduces surgical site infection rates. Hernia. 2015;19(2):273–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Rodriguez-Unda N, Soares KC, Azoury SC, et al. Negative-pressure wound therapy in the management of high-grade ventral hernia repairs. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(11):2054–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Agnew SP, Small Jr W, Wang E, Smith LJ, Hadad I, Dumanian GA. Prospective measurements of intra-abdominal volume and pulmonary function after repair of massive ventral hernias with the components separation technique. Ann Surg. 2010;251(5):981–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Acosta S, Bjarnason T, Petersson U, et al. Multicentre prospective study of fascial closure rate after open abdomen with vacuum and mesh-mediated fascial traction. Br J Surg. 2011;98(5):735–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ferreira F, Barbosa E, Guerreiro E, Fraga GP, Nascimento Jr B, Rizoli S. Sequential closure of the abdominal wall with continuous fascia traction (using mesh or suture) and negative pressure therapy. Rev Coleg Brasil Cirurg. 2013;40(1):85–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Fortelny RH, Hofmann A, Gruber-Blum S, Petter-Puchner AH, Glaser KS. Delayed closure of open abdomen in septic patients is facilitated by combined negative pressure wound therapy and dynamic fascial suture. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(3):735–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Bjorck M, Bruhin A, Cheatham M, et al. Classification–important step to improve management of patients with an open abdomen. World J Surg. 2009;33(6):1154–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Jacobsen WM, Petty PM, Bite U, Johnson CH. Massive abdominal-wall hernia reconstruction with expanded external/internal oblique and transversalis musculofascia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100(2):326–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Admire AA, Dolich MO, Sisley AC, Samimi KJ. Massive ventral hernias: role of tissue expansion in abdominal wall restoration following abdominal compartment syndrome. Am Surg. 2002;68(5):491–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Rosen MJ, Reynolds HL, Champagne B, Delaney CP. A novel approach for the simultaneous repair of large midline incisional and parastomal hernias with biological mesh and retrorectus reconstruction. Am J Surg. 2010;199(3):416–20. discussion 420–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Pauli EM, Wang J, Petro CC, Juza RM, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ. Posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release successfully addresses recurrent ventral hernias following anterior component separation. Hernia. 2015;19(2):285–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Barbosa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barbosa, E., Ferreira, F. (2017). Minimally Invasive Component Separation for the Repair of Large Abdominal Wall Defects. In: Latifi, R. (eds) Surgery of Complex Abdominal Wall Defects. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55868-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55868-4_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55867-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55868-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics