Skip to main content

Two-Phase Strategy Managing Insensitivity in Global Optimization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Applications of Evolutionary Computation (EvoApplications 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10199))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Solving ill-posed continuous, global optimization problems remains challenging. For example, there are no well-established methods for handling objective insensitivity in the neighborhood of solutions, which appears in many important applications, e.g., in non-invasive tumor tissue diagnosis or geophysical exploration. The paper presents a complex metaheuristic that identifies regions of objective function’s insensitivity (plateaus). The strategy is composed of a multi-deme hierarchic memetic strategy coupled with random sample clustering, cluster integration, and special kind of multiwinner selection that allows to breed the demes and cover each plateau separately. We test the method on benchmarks with multiple non-convex plateaus and evaluate how well the plateaus are covered.

The work presented in this paper has been partially supported by National Science Centre, Poland grant no. 2015/17/B/ST6/01867 and by the AGH statutory research grant no. 11.11.230.124.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the theory of elections it is often assumed that a rule can output several tied committees, and these ties have to somehow be broken. In our application it is far simpler to assume that tie-breaking already happened within the rule and we get a unique outcome.

References

  1. Tikhonov, A., Goncharsky, A., Stepanov, V., Yagola, A.: Numerical Methods for the Solution of Ill-Posed Problems. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1995)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta, D., Ghafir, S.: An overview of methods maintaining diversity in genetic algorithms. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. 2(5), 56–60 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Telega, H.: Two-phase stochastic global optimization strategies. In: Schaefer, R. (ed.) Foundation of Genetic Global Optimization. SCI, vol. 74, pp. 153–197. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73192-4_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Faliszewski, P., Sawicki, J., Schaefer, R., Smołka, M.: Multiwinner voting in genetic algorithms for solving ill-posed global optimization problems. In: Squillero, G., Burelli, P. (eds.) EvoApplications 2016. LNCS, vol. 9597, pp. 409–424. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31204-0_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Isshiki, M., Sinclair, D., Kaneko, S.: Lens design: global optimization of both performance and tolerance sensitivity. In: International Optical Design, Optical Society of America (2006). TuA5

    Google Scholar 

  6. Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., Gupta, V.: Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resour. Res. 28(4), 1015–1031 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smołka, M., Gajda-Zagórska, E., Schaefer, R., Paszyński, M., Pardo, D.: A hybrid method for inversion of 3D AC logging measurements. Appl. Soft Comput. 36, 422–456 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Paruch, M., Majchrzak, E.: Identification of tumor region parameters using evolutionary algorithm and multiple reciprocity boundary element method. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 20(5), 647–655 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zeidler, E.: Nonlinear Functional Analysis and its Application. II/A: Linear Monotone Operators. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sawicki, J.: Identification of low sensitivity regions for inverse problems solutions. Master’s thesis, AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Informatics, Electronics and Telecommunication, Kraków, Poland (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Faliszewski, P., Sawicki, J., Schaefer, R., Smołka, M.: Multiwinner voting in genetic algorithms. Accepted to IEEE Intelligent Systems (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smołka, M., Schaefer, R., Paszyński, M., Pardo, D., Álvarez-Aramberri, J.: An agent-oriented hierarchic strategy for solving inverse problems. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 25(3), 483–498 (2015)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Schaefer, R., Adamska, K., Telega, H.: Clustered genetic search in continuous landscape exploration. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 17, 407–416 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Łoś, M., Schaefer, R., Sawicki, J., Smołka, M.: Local misfit approximation in memetic solving of ill-posed inverse problems. In: Squillero, G., Sim, K. (eds.) EvoApplications 2017. LNCS, vol. 10199, pp. 297–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wolny, A., Schaefer, R.: Improving population-based algorithms with fitness deterioration. J. Telecommun. Inf. Technol. 4(4), 31–44 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schaefer, R., Kołodziej, J.: Genetic search reinforced by the population hierarchy. In: Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, vol. 7, pp. 383–399. Morgan Kaufman (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ankerst, M., Breunig, M.M., Kriegel, H.P., Sander, J.: Optics: ordering points to identify the clustering structure. SIGMOD Rec. 28(2), 49–60 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schubert, E., Koos, A., Emrich, T., Züfle, A., Schmid, K.A., Zimek, A.: A framework for clustering uncertain data. PVLDB 8(12), 1976–1979 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ursem, R.K.: Multinational evolutionary algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 1999, vol. 3. IEEE (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Aziz, H., Brill, M., Conitzer, V., Elkind, E., Freeman, R., Walsh, T.: Justified representation in approval-based committee voting. In: Proceedings of the 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligecne, pp. 784–790 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Elkind, E., Faliszewski, P., Skowron, P., Slinko, A.: Properties of multiwinner voting rules. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 53–60, May 2014

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lu, T., Boutilier, C.: Budgeted social choice: from consensus to personalized decision making. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 280–286 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vose, M.: The Simple Genetic Algorithm. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jakub Sawicki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sawicki, J., Smołka, M., Łoś, M., Schaefer, R., Faliszewski, P. (2017). Two-Phase Strategy Managing Insensitivity in Global Optimization. In: Squillero, G., Sim, K. (eds) Applications of Evolutionary Computation. EvoApplications 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10199. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55849-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55849-3_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55848-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55849-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics