Advertisement

Adjustable Male Slings: REMEEX

  • Aljendro Sousa Escandon
  • Juan León
  • Javier Flores
  • Daniel Sousa-González
Chapter

Abstract

Urinary incontinence remains a serious problem for a significant minority of patients following prostate cancer treatment, due to the adverse effect on the quality of life. A better understanding of the anatomical structures that maintain urinary continence after radical prostatectomy has significantly reduced the rate and severity of post-radical prostatectomy incontinency.

References

  1. 1.
    Welk B. Combination options with the male urethral sling to treating post-prostatectomy incontinence. Can Urol Assoc J. 2011;5(2):112.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sandhu J. Treatment options for male stress incontinence. Nat Rev Urol. 2010;7:222–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moore K, Lucas M. Management of male urinary incontinence. Ind J Urol. 2010;26(2):236–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barrington J, Archer R, Kulkarni M, Forrest A. The TRT female Remeex system ® for recurrent female stress urinary incontinence: a 5-year follow-up study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;33(4):391–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giberti C, Gallo F, Cortese P, Schenone M. The suburethral tension adjustable sling (REMEEX system) in the treatment of female urinary incontinence due to 'true' intrinsic sphincter deficiency: results after 5 years of mean follow-up. BJU Int. 2011;108(7):1140–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moreno J, Marqués A, Araño P, Fuente P, Cerezuela JF, Sousa A, et al. Spanish registry of the TRT Reemex system in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Arch Esp Urol. 2006;59(2):169–74.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sousa A, Rodríguez JI, Uribarri C, Marques A. Externally readjustable sling for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: points of technique and preliminary results. J Endourol. 2004;18(1):113–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sousa A. Suburethral readjustable sling (REMEEX) in male urinary incontinence: surgical technique. J Urol. 2005;173(4 Suppl):366–7.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sousa-Escandón A, Cabrera J, Mantovani F, Moretti M, Ioanidis E, Kondelidis N, et al. Adjustable suburethral sling (male remeex system) in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a multicentric European study. Eur Urol. 2007;52(5):1473–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Di Marco M, Granata D, Casilio M, Franco G. Male Remeex System (MRS): a new device for male urinary stress incontinence AUA Annual Meeting 2008, 178 Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jiménez J, Cebrián J, Hualde A, et al. REMEEX® system for the treatment of male urinary stress incontinence: our experience. Actas Urol Esp. 2010;34(9):802–5.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sousa A. Male Remeex System™ (MRS) for the surgical treatment of male incontinence: 12 years from the first case. 32 SIU Congress Fukuoka—Japan 2012.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Woon S, Hwan J, Walsh R, Berger Y. Outcomes of readjustable male sling (Remeex System) for prostatectomy urinary incontinence: experience from two centres AUA Annual Meeting 2014 Florida, OR, USA.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Navalón V, Ordoño F, Pallás Y, et al. Long-term follow-up for the treatment of male urinary incontinence with the Remeex system. Actas Urol Esp. 2016;40(6):406–11.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Srivastava A, Peyser A, Gruschow S, Harneja N, Jiskrova K, Tewari AK. Estrategias quirúrgicas para fomentar una temprana recuperación de la continencia después de la prostatectomía radical robótica. Arch Esp Urol. 2012;65(5):529–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Comiter C, Dobberfuhl A. The artificial urinary sphincter and male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence: which patient should get which procedure? Invest Clin Urol. 2016;57(1):3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Comiter C. Surgery for postprostatectomy incontinence: which procedure for which patient? Nat Rev Urol. 2015;12:91–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rehder P, Haab F, Cornu JN, Gozzi C, Bauer RM. Treatment of postprostatectomy male urinary incontinence with the transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling suspension: 3-year follow-up. Eur Urol. 2012;62(1):140–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leach GE, Trockman B, Wong A, Hamilton J, Haab F, Zimmern PE. Post-prostatectomy incontinence urodynamic findings and treatment outcomes. J Urol. 1996;155:1256–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yoshimura N, Chancellor M. Differential diagnosis and treatment of impaired bladder emptying. Rev Urol. 2004;6(Suppl 1):S24–31.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aboseif SR, O’Connell HE, Usui A, Mc Guire EJ. Collagen injection for intrinsic sphincteric deficiency in men. J Urol. 1998;155:10–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Klutke JJ, Suir C, Andriole G, Klutke CG. Long-term results after antegrade collagen injection for stress urinary incontinence following radical retropublic prostatectomy. Urology. 1999;53:974–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kaboré FA, Gaillet S, Blanc J, Boissier R, Aurier KL, Delaporte V, et al. Initial results of adjustable periurethral balloons (ACT™ and pro ACT™) in the treatment of adult stress urinary incontinence with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Prog Urol. 2014;24(17):1132–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Van der Aa F, Drake MJ, Kasyan GR, Petrolekas A, Cornu JN. Young academic urologists functional urology group. The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence. Eur Urol. 2013;63:681–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alwaal A, Harris CR, Awad MA, Allen IE, Breyer BN. Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database. Int Urol Nephrol 2016;48(10):1571–6.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gousse AE, Madjar S, Lambert MM, Fishman IJ. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results. J Urol. 2001;166:1755–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kumar A, Litt ER, Ballert KN, Nitti VW. Artificial urinary sphincter versus male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence—what do patients choose? J Urol. 2009;181:1231–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Clemens JQ, Bushman W, Schaeffer AJ. Urodynamicanalysis of the bulbourethral sling procedure. J Urol. 1999;162:1972–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Seweryn J, Bauer W, Ponholzer A, Schramek P. Initial experience and results with a new adjustable transobturator male system for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2012;187:956–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hoda MR, Primus G, Schumann A, Fischereder K, von Heyden B, Schmid N, et al. Behandlung der Belastungsinkontinenz nach radikaler Prostatektomie. Urologe. 2012;51:1576–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bauer W. Adjustable transobturator male system—ATOMS—for the treatment of post–prostatectomy urinary incontinence: the surgical technique. Pelviperineology. 2011;30:10–6.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Trost L, Elliott DS. Male stress urinary incontinence: a review of surgical treatment options and outcomes. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:287489.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hubner WA, Gallistl H, Rutkowski M, Huber ER. Adjustable bulbourethral male sling: experience after 101 cases of moderate-to-severe male stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2011;107:777–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dalpiaz O, Knopf HJ, Orth S, Griese K, Aboulsorour S, Truss M. Mid-term complications after placement of the male adjustable suburethral sling: a single center experience. J Urol. 2011 Aug;186(2):604–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lim B, Kim A, Song M, Chun JY, Park J, Choo MS. Comparing Argus sling and artificial urinary sphincter in patients with moderate post-prostatectomy incontinence. J Exerc Rehabil. 2014;10(5):337–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Panayotov IV, Orti V, Cuisinier F, Yachouh J. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016;27(7):118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aljendro Sousa Escandon
    • 1
  • Juan León
    • 1
  • Javier Flores
    • 1
  • Daniel Sousa-González
    • 1
  1. 1.Urologist Hospital Comarcal de MonforteLugoSpain

Personalised recommendations