Advertisement

The AdVance Transobturator Male Sling

  • Oscar A. Suárez
  • Amanda S. Chung
  • Kurt A. McCammon
Chapter

Abstract

The AdVance Transobturator Male Sling (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN, USA) is a minimally invasive bulbourethral sling, which has been shown to be safe and efficacious in the treatment of men with mild-to-moderate stress urinary incontinence, particularly in the post-prostatectomy cohort. This chapter discusses the mode of action, preoperative patient selection and evaluation, surgical technique, postoperative care, outcomes, complications, and salvage maneuvers, regarding utilization of the AdVance sling. Several theories exist regarding the mode of action of the sling in effecting continence. The sling has also been used for the treatment of other types of stress urinary incontinence, such as in neurogenic incontinent patients though with caution. Previous radiation and detrusor overactivity seem to be negative predictive factors of sling success. In general, complications are minimal. Sling failures can be managed by repeat sling insertion in some cases or insertion of an artificial urinary sphincter.

Keywords

Urinary incontinence Urinary incontinence, stress Male sling Post-prostatectomy incontinence 

References

  1. 1.
    Suarez OA, McCammon KA. The artificial urinary sphincter in the management of incontinence. Urology. 2016;92:14–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar A, Litt ER, Ballert KN, Nitti VW. Artificial urinary sphincter versus male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence—what do patients choose? J Urol. 2009;181:1231–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rehder P, Gozzi C. Transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence including post-radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;52:860–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ridder DD, Rehder P. The AdVance® male sling: anatomic features in relation to mode of action. Eur Urol. 2011;10:383–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Habashy D, Losco G, Tse V, Collins R, Chan L. Mid-term outcomes of a male retrourethral, transobturator synthetic sling for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence: impact of radiotherapy and storage dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016; doi: 10.1002/nau.23078.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davies OD, Bepple JL, McCammon KA. Urodynamic changes and initial results of the AdVance male sling. Urology. 2009;74:354–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Soljanik I, Becker AJ, Stief CG, Gozzi C, Bauer RM. Urodynamic parameters after retrourethral transobturator male sling and their influence on outcome. Urology. 2011;78:708–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Comiter CV. Surgery insight: surgical management of post-prostatectomy incontinence: the artificial urinary and male sling. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2007;4:615–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zuckerman JM, Edwards B, Henderson K, Beydoun HA, McCammon KA. Extended outcomes in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence with a transobturator sling. Urology. 2014;83:939–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bauer RM, Mayer ME, Gratzke C, Soljanik I, Buchner A, Bastian PJ, et al. Prospective evaluation of the functional sling suspension for male postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: results after 1 year. Eur Urol. 2009;56:928–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bauer RM, Gozzi C, Roosen A, Khoder W, Trottmann M, Waidelich R, et al. Impact of the ‘repositioning test’ on post-operative outcome of retroluminar transobturator male sling implantation. Urol Int. 2013;90:334–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rehder P, Freiin von Gleissenthall G, Pichler R, Glodny B. The treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence with the retroluminal transobturator repositioning sling (AdVance): lessons learnt from accumulative experience. Arch Esp Urol. 2009;62:860–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Comiter CV, Dobberfuhl AD. The artificial urinary sphincter and male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence: which patient should get which procedure? Investig Clin Urol. 2016;57:3–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Torrey R, Rajeshuni N, Ruel N, Muldrew S, Chan K. Radiation history affects continence outcomes after AdVance transobturator sling placement in patients with post-prostatectomy incontinence. Urology. 2013;82:713–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Groen LA, Spinoit AF, Hoebeke P, Van Laecke E, De Troyer B, Everaert K. The AdVance male sling as a minimally invasive treatment for intrinsic sphincter deficiency in patients with neurogenic bladder sphincter dysfunction: a pilot study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31:1284–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rehder P, Haab F, Cornu JN, Gozzi C, Bauer RM. Treatment of postprostatectomy male urinary incontinence with the transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling suspension: 3-year follow-up. Eur Urol. 2012;62:140–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kowalik CG, DeLong JM, Mourtzinos AP. The AdVance transobturator male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence: subjective and objective outcomes with 3 years follow up. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34:251–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bauer RM, Mayer ME, May F, Gratzke C, Buchner A, Soljanik I, et al. Complications of the AdVance transobturator male sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2010;75:1494–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harris SE, Guralnick ML, O’Connor RC. Urethral erosion of transobturator male sling. Urology. 2009;73:443 e19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim PH, Pinheiro LC, Atoria CL, Eastham JA, Sandhu JS, Elkin EB. Trends in the use of incontinence procedures after radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis. J Urol. 2013;189:602–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Belot PY, Fassi-Fehri H, Crouzet S, Coda R, Badet L, Gelet A, et al. Treatment of stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery: results of the artificial urinary sphincter after suburethral sling failure. Prog Urol. 2012;22:644–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lentz AC, Peterson AC, Webster GD. Outcomes following artificial sphincter implantation after prior unsuccessful male sling. J Urol. 2012;187:2149–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Al-Najar A, Kaufmann S, Boy S, Naumann CM, Junemann PK, Van Der Horst C. Management of recurrent post-prostatectomy incontinence after previous failed retrourethral male slings. Can Urol Assoc J. 2011;5:107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Martinez EJ, Zuckerman JM, Henderson K, Edwards B, McCammon KA. Evaluation of salvage male transobturator sling placement following recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed transobturator sling. Urology. 2015;85:478–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Soljanik I, Becker AJ, Stief CG, et al. Repeat retrourethral transobturator sling in the management of recurrent postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence after failed first male sling. Eur Urol. 2010;58:767–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bauer RM, Gozzi C, Klehr B, Kretschmer A, Grabbert M, Rehder P, et al. AdVanceXP male sling: 2-year results of a multicenter study. World J Urol. 2016;34:1025–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oscar A. Suárez
    • 1
  • Amanda S. Chung
    • 2
  • Kurt A. McCammon
    • 2
  1. 1.Hospital San José Tecnológico de MonterreyMonterrey, N.L.USA
  2. 2.Eastern Virginia Medical SchoolVirginia BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations